Gayatri Anil, Joshua Glass, Abdolreza Mosaddegh, Casey L Cazer
{"title":"抗菌剂最小抑菌浓度可通过随机森林方法从表型数据中推算出来。","authors":"Gayatri Anil, Joshua Glass, Abdolreza Mosaddegh, Casey L Cazer","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.10.0314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a public health threat requiring monitoring across multiple sectors because AMR genes and pathogens can pass between humans, animals, and the environment. Idiosyncrasies in AMR data, including missing data and changes in testing protocols, make characterizing AMR trends over time and sectors challenging. Therefore, this study applied machine learning methods to impute missing minimum inhibitory concentrations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Models were built using cattle-associated Escherichia coli from the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System. Random forest models were designed to predict the minimum inhibitory concentration of a given E coli isolate for 10 antimicrobials. Predictors included isolate metadata and the minimum inhibitory concentrations of other antimicrobials. Model performance was evaluated on held-out test data and 2 external datasets (E coli isolated from chickens and humans).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the accuracy within 1 minimum inhibitory concentration category was over 80% for all 10 antimicrobials and over 90% for 5 antimicrobials on test data. Six of the models performed as well on both external datasets as on test data, whereas the remaining 4 had similar accuracy on the human dataset but lower on the chicken data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results indicate that the models can predict minimum inhibitory concentration values at a level of accuracy that would be helpful for imputation in resistance datasets.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The imputation of missing minimum inhibitory concentrations would allow for better evaluation of AMR trends over time, helping inform stewardship policies. These models may also help streamline surveillance and clinical susceptibility testing because they suggest which antimicrobials need to be laboratory-tested and which can be extrapolated by modeling.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations can be imputed from phenotypic data using a random forest approach.\",\"authors\":\"Gayatri Anil, Joshua Glass, Abdolreza Mosaddegh, Casey L Cazer\",\"doi\":\"10.2460/ajvr.24.10.0314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a public health threat requiring monitoring across multiple sectors because AMR genes and pathogens can pass between humans, animals, and the environment. Idiosyncrasies in AMR data, including missing data and changes in testing protocols, make characterizing AMR trends over time and sectors challenging. Therefore, this study applied machine learning methods to impute missing minimum inhibitory concentrations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Models were built using cattle-associated Escherichia coli from the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System. Random forest models were designed to predict the minimum inhibitory concentration of a given E coli isolate for 10 antimicrobials. Predictors included isolate metadata and the minimum inhibitory concentrations of other antimicrobials. Model performance was evaluated on held-out test data and 2 external datasets (E coli isolated from chickens and humans).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the accuracy within 1 minimum inhibitory concentration category was over 80% for all 10 antimicrobials and over 90% for 5 antimicrobials on test data. Six of the models performed as well on both external datasets as on test data, whereas the remaining 4 had similar accuracy on the human dataset but lower on the chicken data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results indicate that the models can predict minimum inhibitory concentration values at a level of accuracy that would be helpful for imputation in resistance datasets.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The imputation of missing minimum inhibitory concentrations would allow for better evaluation of AMR trends over time, helping inform stewardship policies. These models may also help streamline surveillance and clinical susceptibility testing because they suggest which antimicrobials need to be laboratory-tested and which can be extrapolated by modeling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of veterinary research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of veterinary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.10.0314\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.10.0314","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations can be imputed from phenotypic data using a random forest approach.
Objective: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a public health threat requiring monitoring across multiple sectors because AMR genes and pathogens can pass between humans, animals, and the environment. Idiosyncrasies in AMR data, including missing data and changes in testing protocols, make characterizing AMR trends over time and sectors challenging. Therefore, this study applied machine learning methods to impute missing minimum inhibitory concentrations.
Methods: Models were built using cattle-associated Escherichia coli from the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System. Random forest models were designed to predict the minimum inhibitory concentration of a given E coli isolate for 10 antimicrobials. Predictors included isolate metadata and the minimum inhibitory concentrations of other antimicrobials. Model performance was evaluated on held-out test data and 2 external datasets (E coli isolated from chickens and humans).
Results: Overall, the accuracy within 1 minimum inhibitory concentration category was over 80% for all 10 antimicrobials and over 90% for 5 antimicrobials on test data. Six of the models performed as well on both external datasets as on test data, whereas the remaining 4 had similar accuracy on the human dataset but lower on the chicken data.
Conclusions: These results indicate that the models can predict minimum inhibitory concentration values at a level of accuracy that would be helpful for imputation in resistance datasets.
Clinical relevance: The imputation of missing minimum inhibitory concentrations would allow for better evaluation of AMR trends over time, helping inform stewardship policies. These models may also help streamline surveillance and clinical susceptibility testing because they suggest which antimicrobials need to be laboratory-tested and which can be extrapolated by modeling.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.