使用偏头痛抑郁筛查工具的方法学挑战:系统综述。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jasmin Asheer, Fatima Ali, Rikke Hilker, Poul Videbech, Henrik Winther Schytz
{"title":"使用偏头痛抑郁筛查工具的方法学挑战:系统综述。","authors":"Jasmin Asheer, Fatima Ali, Rikke Hilker, Poul Videbech, Henrik Winther Schytz","doi":"10.1177/03331024251317635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression is frequently described to occur in migraine, and depression screening questionnaires are commonly used to evaluate depressive symptoms in patients with migraine. The present study aimed to investigate how the most common depression screening tools are used in migraine studies to determine whether they are applied and interpreted correctly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed was systematically searched, and we included any study using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). The study included adults diagnosed with migraine based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-2 or ICHD-3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search generated 78 studies. Thirty-five (45%) of the included studies used a depression screening tool as evidence of depression. This applied to 53, 46, 47 and 13% of studies using PHQ, BDI, HADS and HAM-D, respectively. Only one study out of 35 confirmed the diagnosis with a diagnostic interview. The data presentation and interpretation across the studies was highly heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Screening tools as evidence of depression in patients with migraine may lead to inaccurate estimates of depression among migraine patients. There is a need for guidelines on and validation of depression screening tools in patients with migraine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 2","pages":"3331024251317635"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological challenges in using screening tools for depression in migraine: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Jasmin Asheer, Fatima Ali, Rikke Hilker, Poul Videbech, Henrik Winther Schytz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03331024251317635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression is frequently described to occur in migraine, and depression screening questionnaires are commonly used to evaluate depressive symptoms in patients with migraine. The present study aimed to investigate how the most common depression screening tools are used in migraine studies to determine whether they are applied and interpreted correctly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed was systematically searched, and we included any study using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). The study included adults diagnosed with migraine based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-2 or ICHD-3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search generated 78 studies. Thirty-five (45%) of the included studies used a depression screening tool as evidence of depression. This applied to 53, 46, 47 and 13% of studies using PHQ, BDI, HADS and HAM-D, respectively. Only one study out of 35 confirmed the diagnosis with a diagnostic interview. The data presentation and interpretation across the studies was highly heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Screening tools as evidence of depression in patients with migraine may lead to inaccurate estimates of depression among migraine patients. There is a need for guidelines on and validation of depression screening tools in patients with migraine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cephalalgia\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"3331024251317635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cephalalgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251317635\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251317635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抑郁症经常被描述为偏头痛患者,抑郁症筛查问卷通常用于评估偏头痛患者的抑郁症状。本研究旨在调查在偏头痛研究中如何使用最常见的抑郁症筛查工具,以确定它们是否被正确应用和解释。方法:系统地检索PubMed,我们纳入了所有使用贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)或汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)的研究。该研究包括根据国际头痛疾病分类(ICHD-2或ICHD-3)诊断为偏头痛的成年人。结果:文献检索共获得78项研究。纳入的研究中有35项(45%)使用抑郁症筛查工具作为抑郁症的证据。这分别适用于53%、46%、47%和13%使用PHQ、BDI、HADS和HAM-D的研究。35项研究中只有一项通过诊断性访谈证实了诊断。这些研究的数据呈现和解释是高度异质的。结论:作为偏头痛患者抑郁证据的筛查工具可能导致对偏头痛患者抑郁的不准确估计。有必要对偏头痛患者抑郁症筛查工具的指南和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methodological challenges in using screening tools for depression in migraine: A systematic review.

Background: Depression is frequently described to occur in migraine, and depression screening questionnaires are commonly used to evaluate depressive symptoms in patients with migraine. The present study aimed to investigate how the most common depression screening tools are used in migraine studies to determine whether they are applied and interpreted correctly.

Methods: PubMed was systematically searched, and we included any study using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) or Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). The study included adults diagnosed with migraine based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-2 or ICHD-3).

Results: The literature search generated 78 studies. Thirty-five (45%) of the included studies used a depression screening tool as evidence of depression. This applied to 53, 46, 47 and 13% of studies using PHQ, BDI, HADS and HAM-D, respectively. Only one study out of 35 confirmed the diagnosis with a diagnostic interview. The data presentation and interpretation across the studies was highly heterogeneous.

Conclusions: Screening tools as evidence of depression in patients with migraine may lead to inaccurate estimates of depression among migraine patients. There is a need for guidelines on and validation of depression screening tools in patients with migraine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信