儿科患者血浆置换治疗中使用溶剂/洗涤剂处理血浆与未处理血浆的不良反应比较

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Samantha Phou, Cari Berryhill, Frank Nizzi, Bryce Pasko
{"title":"儿科患者血浆置换治疗中使用溶剂/洗涤剂处理血浆与未处理血浆的不良反应比较","authors":"Samantha Phou,&nbsp;Cari Berryhill,&nbsp;Frank Nizzi,&nbsp;Bryce Pasko","doi":"10.1002/jca.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Solvent/detergent treated plasma (SD plasma) use in therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in pediatric patients is not commonly reported. This study aimed to determine transfusion reaction rates using SD plasma and to compare transfusion reaction rates and adverse events when using SD plasma versus untreated plasma in pediatric TPE. A retrospective review was performed on TPE procedures performed at a single institution over a 3-year period. For each TPE procedure, replacement fluid was determined at the discretion of the transfusion medicine physician, consisting of either 5% albumin, untreated plasma, SD plasma, or a combination of untreated or SD plasma with 5% albumin. SD plasma was used in 51 TPE procedures performed on 17 patients. In comparison, untreated plasma was used in 254 procedures in 68 patients. Patient ages ranged from 6 days to 20 years old. With SD plasma use, 1 procedure (2% incidence) reported a non-severe allergic transfusion reaction, compared to 9 procedures (3.5% incidence) with untreated plasma use. These transfusion reaction rates were not statistically different (<i>p</i> = 0.7036, two-tailed Fisher's exact test). Circuit clotting issues were reported in one patient during two discrete TPE procedures utilizing untreated plasma. No other transfusion reactions or adverse events were reported. SD plasma used for TPE was well tolerated, with transfusion reaction rates similar to those observed in untreated plasma in our pediatric patients. SD plasma may be used for TPE in pediatric patients without apparent increased procedure-related risks or increased risks of transfusion reactions compared to untreated plasma.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"40 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Adverse Reactions With Solvent/Detergent Treated Plasma Versus Untreated Plasma Use in Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Patients\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Phou,&nbsp;Cari Berryhill,&nbsp;Frank Nizzi,&nbsp;Bryce Pasko\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jca.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Solvent/detergent treated plasma (SD plasma) use in therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in pediatric patients is not commonly reported. This study aimed to determine transfusion reaction rates using SD plasma and to compare transfusion reaction rates and adverse events when using SD plasma versus untreated plasma in pediatric TPE. A retrospective review was performed on TPE procedures performed at a single institution over a 3-year period. For each TPE procedure, replacement fluid was determined at the discretion of the transfusion medicine physician, consisting of either 5% albumin, untreated plasma, SD plasma, or a combination of untreated or SD plasma with 5% albumin. SD plasma was used in 51 TPE procedures performed on 17 patients. In comparison, untreated plasma was used in 254 procedures in 68 patients. Patient ages ranged from 6 days to 20 years old. With SD plasma use, 1 procedure (2% incidence) reported a non-severe allergic transfusion reaction, compared to 9 procedures (3.5% incidence) with untreated plasma use. These transfusion reaction rates were not statistically different (<i>p</i> = 0.7036, two-tailed Fisher's exact test). Circuit clotting issues were reported in one patient during two discrete TPE procedures utilizing untreated plasma. No other transfusion reactions or adverse events were reported. SD plasma used for TPE was well tolerated, with transfusion reaction rates similar to those observed in untreated plasma in our pediatric patients. SD plasma may be used for TPE in pediatric patients without apparent increased procedure-related risks or increased risks of transfusion reactions compared to untreated plasma.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Apheresis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在儿科患者治疗性血浆置换(TPE)中使用溶剂/洗涤剂处理血浆(SD 血浆)的报道并不多见。本研究旨在确定使用 SD 血浆的输血反应率,并比较在儿科 TPE 中使用 SD 血浆和未经处理的血浆时的输血反应率和不良事件。研究对一家医疗机构在三年内进行的 TPE 手术进行了回顾性审查。每例 TPE 手术的替代液由输血科医生决定,包括 5% 的白蛋白、未经处理的血浆、标清血浆或未经处理的血浆或标清血浆与 5% 白蛋白的组合。在为 17 名患者进行的 51 例 TPE 手术中使用了标清血浆。相比之下,未经处理的血浆用于 68 名患者的 254 例手术。患者年龄从 6 天到 20 岁不等。使用标本血浆时,有 1 例手术(发生率为 2%)报告了非严重过敏性输血反应,而使用未经处理的血浆时,有 9 例手术(发生率为 3.5%)报告了非严重过敏性输血反应。这些输血反应发生率没有统计学差异(P = 0.7036,双尾费雪精确检验)。在使用未经处理的血浆进行的两次不连续 TPE 过程中,一名患者出现了回路凝血问题。未报告其他输血反应或不良事件。用于 TPE 的标化血浆耐受性良好,在我们的儿科患者中观察到的输血反应发生率与未经处理的血浆相似。与未经处理的血浆相比,SD 血浆可用于儿科患者的 TPE,而不会明显增加手术相关风险或输血反应风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Adverse Reactions With Solvent/Detergent Treated Plasma Versus Untreated Plasma Use in Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Patients

Solvent/detergent treated plasma (SD plasma) use in therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in pediatric patients is not commonly reported. This study aimed to determine transfusion reaction rates using SD plasma and to compare transfusion reaction rates and adverse events when using SD plasma versus untreated plasma in pediatric TPE. A retrospective review was performed on TPE procedures performed at a single institution over a 3-year period. For each TPE procedure, replacement fluid was determined at the discretion of the transfusion medicine physician, consisting of either 5% albumin, untreated plasma, SD plasma, or a combination of untreated or SD plasma with 5% albumin. SD plasma was used in 51 TPE procedures performed on 17 patients. In comparison, untreated plasma was used in 254 procedures in 68 patients. Patient ages ranged from 6 days to 20 years old. With SD plasma use, 1 procedure (2% incidence) reported a non-severe allergic transfusion reaction, compared to 9 procedures (3.5% incidence) with untreated plasma use. These transfusion reaction rates were not statistically different (p = 0.7036, two-tailed Fisher's exact test). Circuit clotting issues were reported in one patient during two discrete TPE procedures utilizing untreated plasma. No other transfusion reactions or adverse events were reported. SD plasma used for TPE was well tolerated, with transfusion reaction rates similar to those observed in untreated plasma in our pediatric patients. SD plasma may be used for TPE in pediatric patients without apparent increased procedure-related risks or increased risks of transfusion reactions compared to untreated plasma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信