慢性阻塞性肺病晚期患者管理德尔菲共识:慢性阻塞性肺病-阿凡兹工作组

Q4 Medicine
Juan Marco Figueira Gonçalves , Javier de Miguel Díez , Bernardino Alcázar Navarrete , Pere Almagro Mena , María Belén Alonso-Ortiz , Ana Balañá Corberó , Miriam Barrecheguren , Roberto Cabestre García , Enrique Cases Viedma , Pilar Cejudo Ramos , Alberto Fernández-Villar , Rafael Golpe , Milagros Iriberri Pascual , José Luis López-Campos , Jesús Molina París , David de la Rosa-Carrillo , Javier Sayas Catalán , Marc Miravitlles , COPD-Avanz Working Group
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病晚期患者管理德尔菲共识:慢性阻塞性肺病-阿凡兹工作组","authors":"Juan Marco Figueira Gonçalves ,&nbsp;Javier de Miguel Díez ,&nbsp;Bernardino Alcázar Navarrete ,&nbsp;Pere Almagro Mena ,&nbsp;María Belén Alonso-Ortiz ,&nbsp;Ana Balañá Corberó ,&nbsp;Miriam Barrecheguren ,&nbsp;Roberto Cabestre García ,&nbsp;Enrique Cases Viedma ,&nbsp;Pilar Cejudo Ramos ,&nbsp;Alberto Fernández-Villar ,&nbsp;Rafael Golpe ,&nbsp;Milagros Iriberri Pascual ,&nbsp;José Luis López-Campos ,&nbsp;Jesús Molina París ,&nbsp;David de la Rosa-Carrillo ,&nbsp;Javier Sayas Catalán ,&nbsp;Marc Miravitlles ,&nbsp;COPD-Avanz Working Group","doi":"10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>To reach a multidisciplinary consensus on the management of patients with advanced COPD using Delphi methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A multidisciplinary committee of experts (Pneumology, Physiotherapy, Internal Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Primary Care, and Nursing) developed a 105-item questionnaire to be agreed by a panel of experts grouped into the following topics: (1) Definition of advanced COPD patients; (2) Management of dyspnoea in patients with advanced COPD; (3) Prevention and recovery of exacerbation in patients with advanced COPD; and (4) Dealing with disease progression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After two rounds, consensus was reached on 77.1% of the items. The definition proposed for advanced COPD and agreed by 91.5% of the panellists stated: “COPD patient with FEV<sub>1</sub> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->50% and at least two of the following criteria: dyspnoea mMRC 3–4, chronic respiratory insufficiency, and limitation in basic activities of daily living”. Other relevant agreements were: the use of opioids, pulmonary rehabilitation and respiratory physiotherapy, or home high-flow therapy and long-term oxygen therapy for the improvement of dyspnoea; the role of comorbidities assessment; the inclusion of these patients in respiratory rehabilitation programmes; the use of inhaled antibiotic treatment in chronic bronchial infection by <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> in the prevention and recovery of exacerbations; and the criteria for lung transplantation or augmentation therapy in patients with advanced COPD and severe α1-antitrypsin deficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this document, a broad panel of experts reached a high degree of consensus on the definition of advanced COPD as well as on its approach. The information provided by this consensus is intended to assist the clinician in the identification of these patients as well as to provide guidance on their management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34317,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Archives","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delphi Consensus on the Management of Patients With Advanced COPD: COPD-Avanz Working Group\",\"authors\":\"Juan Marco Figueira Gonçalves ,&nbsp;Javier de Miguel Díez ,&nbsp;Bernardino Alcázar Navarrete ,&nbsp;Pere Almagro Mena ,&nbsp;María Belén Alonso-Ortiz ,&nbsp;Ana Balañá Corberó ,&nbsp;Miriam Barrecheguren ,&nbsp;Roberto Cabestre García ,&nbsp;Enrique Cases Viedma ,&nbsp;Pilar Cejudo Ramos ,&nbsp;Alberto Fernández-Villar ,&nbsp;Rafael Golpe ,&nbsp;Milagros Iriberri Pascual ,&nbsp;José Luis López-Campos ,&nbsp;Jesús Molina París ,&nbsp;David de la Rosa-Carrillo ,&nbsp;Javier Sayas Catalán ,&nbsp;Marc Miravitlles ,&nbsp;COPD-Avanz Working Group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>To reach a multidisciplinary consensus on the management of patients with advanced COPD using Delphi methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A multidisciplinary committee of experts (Pneumology, Physiotherapy, Internal Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Primary Care, and Nursing) developed a 105-item questionnaire to be agreed by a panel of experts grouped into the following topics: (1) Definition of advanced COPD patients; (2) Management of dyspnoea in patients with advanced COPD; (3) Prevention and recovery of exacerbation in patients with advanced COPD; and (4) Dealing with disease progression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After two rounds, consensus was reached on 77.1% of the items. The definition proposed for advanced COPD and agreed by 91.5% of the panellists stated: “COPD patient with FEV<sub>1</sub> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->50% and at least two of the following criteria: dyspnoea mMRC 3–4, chronic respiratory insufficiency, and limitation in basic activities of daily living”. Other relevant agreements were: the use of opioids, pulmonary rehabilitation and respiratory physiotherapy, or home high-flow therapy and long-term oxygen therapy for the improvement of dyspnoea; the role of comorbidities assessment; the inclusion of these patients in respiratory rehabilitation programmes; the use of inhaled antibiotic treatment in chronic bronchial infection by <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em> in the prevention and recovery of exacerbations; and the criteria for lung transplantation or augmentation therapy in patients with advanced COPD and severe α1-antitrypsin deficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this document, a broad panel of experts reached a high degree of consensus on the definition of advanced COPD as well as on its approach. The information provided by this consensus is intended to assist the clinician in the identification of these patients as well as to provide guidance on their management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Respiratory Archives\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Respiratory Archives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663625000153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663625000153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用德尔菲方法对晚期COPD患者的管理达成多学科共识。材料和方法一个多学科专家委员会(肺病学、物理治疗、内科、物理医学和康复、初级保健和护理)制定了一份105项的调查问卷,由专家小组按以下主题分组同意:(1)晚期COPD患者的定义;(2)晚期COPD患者呼吸困难的处理;(3)晚期COPD患者急性加重的预防与恢复;(4)处理疾病进展。结果经过两轮协商,77.1%的议题达成共识。91.5%的专家组成员同意的晚期COPD的定义如下:“FEV1 <的COPD患者;50%以上且至少符合以下两项标准:呼吸困难(mMRC - 3-4)、慢性呼吸功能不全、基本日常生活活动受限”。其他相关协议包括:使用阿片类药物、肺康复和呼吸物理治疗,或家庭高流量治疗和长期氧疗以改善呼吸困难;合并症评估的作用;将这些患者纳入呼吸康复规划;铜绿假单胞菌慢性支气管感染吸入抗生素治疗在预防和恢复病情加重中的应用;晚期COPD合并严重α - 1抗胰蛋白酶缺乏患者肺移植或强化治疗的标准。在这份文件中,一个广泛的专家小组就晚期COPD的定义及其治疗方法达成了高度共识。这一共识提供的信息旨在帮助临床医生识别这些患者,并为他们的管理提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Delphi Consensus on the Management of Patients With Advanced COPD: COPD-Avanz Working Group

Delphi Consensus on the Management of Patients With Advanced COPD: COPD-Avanz Working Group

Introduction

To reach a multidisciplinary consensus on the management of patients with advanced COPD using Delphi methodology.

Material and methods

A multidisciplinary committee of experts (Pneumology, Physiotherapy, Internal Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Primary Care, and Nursing) developed a 105-item questionnaire to be agreed by a panel of experts grouped into the following topics: (1) Definition of advanced COPD patients; (2) Management of dyspnoea in patients with advanced COPD; (3) Prevention and recovery of exacerbation in patients with advanced COPD; and (4) Dealing with disease progression.

Results

After two rounds, consensus was reached on 77.1% of the items. The definition proposed for advanced COPD and agreed by 91.5% of the panellists stated: “COPD patient with FEV1 < 50% and at least two of the following criteria: dyspnoea mMRC 3–4, chronic respiratory insufficiency, and limitation in basic activities of daily living”. Other relevant agreements were: the use of opioids, pulmonary rehabilitation and respiratory physiotherapy, or home high-flow therapy and long-term oxygen therapy for the improvement of dyspnoea; the role of comorbidities assessment; the inclusion of these patients in respiratory rehabilitation programmes; the use of inhaled antibiotic treatment in chronic bronchial infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the prevention and recovery of exacerbations; and the criteria for lung transplantation or augmentation therapy in patients with advanced COPD and severe α1-antitrypsin deficiency.

Conclusions

In this document, a broad panel of experts reached a high degree of consensus on the definition of advanced COPD as well as on its approach. The information provided by this consensus is intended to assist the clinician in the identification of these patients as well as to provide guidance on their management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Archives
Open Respiratory Archives Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信