BFRP与CFRP加固低强度连续RC梁抗剪性能对比分析:试验与数值研究

IF 5.3 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES
Mu'tasim Abdel-Jaber , Rawand Al-Nsour , Aseel Almahameed , Ahmed Ashteyat
{"title":"BFRP与CFRP加固低强度连续RC梁抗剪性能对比分析:试验与数值研究","authors":"Mu'tasim Abdel-Jaber ,&nbsp;Rawand Al-Nsour ,&nbsp;Aseel Almahameed ,&nbsp;Ahmed Ashteyat","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomc.2025.100575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The integration of Basalt Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) materials marks a significant advancement in sustainable construction. This study evaluates the impact of externally bonded BFRP and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) sheets and laminates on the shear strength of reinforced concrete (RC) beams with a compressive strength of 20 MPa. Seven full-scale, two-span RC beams, each four meters in length, were tested, with identical strengthening patterns applied to both BFRP and CFRP sheets to allow for a direct comparison. One beam served as a control sample to assess the effectiveness of the strengthening techniques. Results showed that CFRP improved the shear capacity of the beams by 38.3 % to 46.6 %, while BFRP provided an increase of 9.7 % to 32.5 %, demonstrating substantial gains in load-carrying capacity for both materials, though CFRP showed a higher performance boost while BFRP materials are an economical alternative for CFRP materials, and the most effective strengthening configuration for both fiber types is full side coverage, as it offers superior confinement of the concrete. These findings were well-aligned with Finite Element Modeling predictions and theoretical expectations, closely matching ACI 440.2R-08 guidelines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34525,"journal":{"name":"Composites Part C Open Access","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100575"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of shear behavior in continuous low-strength RC beams strengthened with BFRP and CFRP: An experimental and numerical investigation\",\"authors\":\"Mu'tasim Abdel-Jaber ,&nbsp;Rawand Al-Nsour ,&nbsp;Aseel Almahameed ,&nbsp;Ahmed Ashteyat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomc.2025.100575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The integration of Basalt Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) materials marks a significant advancement in sustainable construction. This study evaluates the impact of externally bonded BFRP and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) sheets and laminates on the shear strength of reinforced concrete (RC) beams with a compressive strength of 20 MPa. Seven full-scale, two-span RC beams, each four meters in length, were tested, with identical strengthening patterns applied to both BFRP and CFRP sheets to allow for a direct comparison. One beam served as a control sample to assess the effectiveness of the strengthening techniques. Results showed that CFRP improved the shear capacity of the beams by 38.3 % to 46.6 %, while BFRP provided an increase of 9.7 % to 32.5 %, demonstrating substantial gains in load-carrying capacity for both materials, though CFRP showed a higher performance boost while BFRP materials are an economical alternative for CFRP materials, and the most effective strengthening configuration for both fiber types is full side coverage, as it offers superior confinement of the concrete. These findings were well-aligned with Finite Element Modeling predictions and theoretical expectations, closely matching ACI 440.2R-08 guidelines.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Composites Part C Open Access\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100575\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Composites Part C Open Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682025000192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Composites Part C Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666682025000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COMPOSITES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

玄武岩纤维增强聚合物(BFRP)材料的集成标志着可持续建筑的重大进步。本研究对抗压强度为20 MPa的钢筋混凝土(RC)梁的抗剪强度进行了外粘接BFRP和碳纤维增强聚合物(CFRP)薄板和层压板的影响评估。七个全尺寸的两跨RC梁,每个长度为4米,采用相同的强化模式应用于BFRP和CFRP板,以便进行直接比较。其中一根梁作为对照样本,评估加固技术的有效性。结果表明,CFRP提高了梁的抗剪能力38.3%至46.6%,而BFRP增加了9.7%至32.5%,表明两种材料的承载能力都有实质性的提高,尽管CFRP表现出更高的性能提升,而BFRP材料是CFRP材料的经济替代品,两种纤维类型最有效的加固配置是全侧覆盖,因为它提供了优越的混凝土约束。这些发现与有限元建模预测和理论期望非常吻合,与ACI 440.2R-08指南非常吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of shear behavior in continuous low-strength RC beams strengthened with BFRP and CFRP: An experimental and numerical investigation
The integration of Basalt Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) materials marks a significant advancement in sustainable construction. This study evaluates the impact of externally bonded BFRP and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) sheets and laminates on the shear strength of reinforced concrete (RC) beams with a compressive strength of 20 MPa. Seven full-scale, two-span RC beams, each four meters in length, were tested, with identical strengthening patterns applied to both BFRP and CFRP sheets to allow for a direct comparison. One beam served as a control sample to assess the effectiveness of the strengthening techniques. Results showed that CFRP improved the shear capacity of the beams by 38.3 % to 46.6 %, while BFRP provided an increase of 9.7 % to 32.5 %, demonstrating substantial gains in load-carrying capacity for both materials, though CFRP showed a higher performance boost while BFRP materials are an economical alternative for CFRP materials, and the most effective strengthening configuration for both fiber types is full side coverage, as it offers superior confinement of the concrete. These findings were well-aligned with Finite Element Modeling predictions and theoretical expectations, closely matching ACI 440.2R-08 guidelines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Composites Part C Open Access
Composites Part C Open Access Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
96
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信