虚拟模拟和自我汇报应用程序对护生儿科疼痛知识的有效性:一项随机对照试验

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Ying-Mei Liu PhD , Jun-Yu Fan PhD , Tang-Her Jaing MD , Tzu-Jung Tseng PhD , Lan-Yan Yang PhD
{"title":"虚拟模拟和自我汇报应用程序对护生儿科疼痛知识的有效性:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Ying-Mei Liu PhD ,&nbsp;Jun-Yu Fan PhD ,&nbsp;Tang-Her Jaing MD ,&nbsp;Tzu-Jung Tseng PhD ,&nbsp;Lan-Yan Yang PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Knowledge retention and decision-making skills are important in clinical nursing practice. A virtual child-based simulation and self-debriefing learning application (app) was developed for pediatric pain assessment and management.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Third-year nursing students received either classroom instruction on pediatric pain (control group (CG), <em>n</em> = 84) or instruction and a virtual simulation learning app (intervention group (IG), <em>n</em> = 100). Differences in pediatric pain knowledge scores between groups before instruction (T0) versus postinstruction (T1) and versus one-month postinstruction/simulation (T2) examined the effect of the intervention on knowledge retention. Three simulation tasks were used to assess the thinking and actions taken (right thinking/right action) by the IG.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>General estimating equations indicated that knowledge scores increased significantly from T0 to T2 for the IG compared to the CG (<em>β</em> = 6.826, <em>p</em> = .016), indicating better knowledge retention. Right thinking/right action for all simulation tasks was achieved by only 22.0% of the IG.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings suggest that virtual scenario-based teaching should include self-briefing to ensure that the correct actions taken during simulations reflect correct thinking about the problem.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 101700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of a virtual simulation and self-debriefing app on nursing students' pediatric pain knowledge: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Ying-Mei Liu PhD ,&nbsp;Jun-Yu Fan PhD ,&nbsp;Tang-Her Jaing MD ,&nbsp;Tzu-Jung Tseng PhD ,&nbsp;Lan-Yan Yang PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Knowledge retention and decision-making skills are important in clinical nursing practice. A virtual child-based simulation and self-debriefing learning application (app) was developed for pediatric pain assessment and management.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Third-year nursing students received either classroom instruction on pediatric pain (control group (CG), <em>n</em> = 84) or instruction and a virtual simulation learning app (intervention group (IG), <em>n</em> = 100). Differences in pediatric pain knowledge scores between groups before instruction (T0) versus postinstruction (T1) and versus one-month postinstruction/simulation (T2) examined the effect of the intervention on knowledge retention. Three simulation tasks were used to assess the thinking and actions taken (right thinking/right action) by the IG.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>General estimating equations indicated that knowledge scores increased significantly from T0 to T2 for the IG compared to the CG (<em>β</em> = 6.826, <em>p</em> = .016), indicating better knowledge retention. Right thinking/right action for all simulation tasks was achieved by only 22.0% of the IG.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings suggest that virtual scenario-based teaching should include self-briefing to ensure that the correct actions taken during simulations reflect correct thinking about the problem.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Simulation in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925000179\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139925000179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

知识保留和决策能力在临床护理实践中非常重要。开发了一款基于儿童的虚拟模拟和自我汇报学习应用程序(app),用于儿童疼痛评估和管理。方法三年级护生分别接受儿童疼痛课堂教学(对照组84例)和虚拟模拟学习应用(干预组100例)。教学前(T0)与教学后(T1)、教学后/模拟1个月(T2)两组儿童疼痛知识得分的差异检验了干预对知识保留的影响。通过三个模拟任务来评估IG的思维和行动(正确的思维/正确的行动)。结果一般估计方程表明,从T0到T2, IG组的知识得分明显高于CG组(β = 6.826, p = 0.016),表明IG组的知识保留更好。对所有模拟任务的正确思考/正确行动只有22.0%的IG实现。结论我们的研究结果表明,基于虚拟场景的教学应该包括自我简报,以确保在模拟过程中采取的正确行动反映了对问题的正确思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of a virtual simulation and self-debriefing app on nursing students' pediatric pain knowledge: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Knowledge retention and decision-making skills are important in clinical nursing practice. A virtual child-based simulation and self-debriefing learning application (app) was developed for pediatric pain assessment and management.

Method

Third-year nursing students received either classroom instruction on pediatric pain (control group (CG), n = 84) or instruction and a virtual simulation learning app (intervention group (IG), n = 100). Differences in pediatric pain knowledge scores between groups before instruction (T0) versus postinstruction (T1) and versus one-month postinstruction/simulation (T2) examined the effect of the intervention on knowledge retention. Three simulation tasks were used to assess the thinking and actions taken (right thinking/right action) by the IG.

Results

General estimating equations indicated that knowledge scores increased significantly from T0 to T2 for the IG compared to the CG (β = 6.826, p = .016), indicating better knowledge retention. Right thinking/right action for all simulation tasks was achieved by only 22.0% of the IG.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that virtual scenario-based teaching should include self-briefing to ensure that the correct actions taken during simulations reflect correct thinking about the problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信