资助尼古丁依赖药物对烟草控制的影响:一项叙述性综述

Q4 Medicine
Carlos Rábade-Castedo , António Morais , Sofía Ravara , Jose Ignacio de Granda-Orive , Jose Pedro Boléo-Tomé , Juan Antonio Riesco-Miranda , Angela Ramos Pinedo , Eva de Higes Martinez , Manuel Ángel Martínez Muñiz , Ruth Pitti Pérez , Maribel Cristóbal Fernández , Carlos A. Jiménez-Ruiz
{"title":"资助尼古丁依赖药物对烟草控制的影响:一项叙述性综述","authors":"Carlos Rábade-Castedo ,&nbsp;António Morais ,&nbsp;Sofía Ravara ,&nbsp;Jose Ignacio de Granda-Orive ,&nbsp;Jose Pedro Boléo-Tomé ,&nbsp;Juan Antonio Riesco-Miranda ,&nbsp;Angela Ramos Pinedo ,&nbsp;Eva de Higes Martinez ,&nbsp;Manuel Ángel Martínez Muñiz ,&nbsp;Ruth Pitti Pérez ,&nbsp;Maribel Cristóbal Fernández ,&nbsp;Carlos A. Jiménez-Ruiz","doi":"10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Pharmacological treatments for smoking associated with psychological counseling triple the chances of quitting. However, the accessibility of these drugs is limited by their financial cost. With this review we aim to demonstrate the effect of partial or full funding in terms of efficacy, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and quality of life. We conducted a literature search for articles related to the issues mentioned above: analysis of the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for nicotine dependence and the effect of their funding. It is shown that the funding of pharmacological treatment can increase the efficacy and effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions. Such funding increases motivation to make a quit attempt. In addition, these strategies can increase self-efficacy, generate social influence and change attitudes toward quitting. Although the funding of pharmacological treatment benefits all smokers, there are certain populations of smokers who are more sensitive to funding strategies such as social groups with lower incomes and lower educational attainment. These funding strategies for smoking cessation interventions have been shown to improve the health and quality of life of the population, as well as the economy, while reducing tobacco use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34317,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Archives","volume":"7 1","pages":"Article 100410"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Funding Medications for Nicotine Dependence on Tobacco Control: A Narrative Review\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Rábade-Castedo ,&nbsp;António Morais ,&nbsp;Sofía Ravara ,&nbsp;Jose Ignacio de Granda-Orive ,&nbsp;Jose Pedro Boléo-Tomé ,&nbsp;Juan Antonio Riesco-Miranda ,&nbsp;Angela Ramos Pinedo ,&nbsp;Eva de Higes Martinez ,&nbsp;Manuel Ángel Martínez Muñiz ,&nbsp;Ruth Pitti Pérez ,&nbsp;Maribel Cristóbal Fernández ,&nbsp;Carlos A. Jiménez-Ruiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Pharmacological treatments for smoking associated with psychological counseling triple the chances of quitting. However, the accessibility of these drugs is limited by their financial cost. With this review we aim to demonstrate the effect of partial or full funding in terms of efficacy, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and quality of life. We conducted a literature search for articles related to the issues mentioned above: analysis of the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for nicotine dependence and the effect of their funding. It is shown that the funding of pharmacological treatment can increase the efficacy and effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions. Such funding increases motivation to make a quit attempt. In addition, these strategies can increase self-efficacy, generate social influence and change attitudes toward quitting. Although the funding of pharmacological treatment benefits all smokers, there are certain populations of smokers who are more sensitive to funding strategies such as social groups with lower incomes and lower educational attainment. These funding strategies for smoking cessation interventions have been shown to improve the health and quality of life of the population, as well as the economy, while reducing tobacco use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Respiratory Archives\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Respiratory Archives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663625000141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663625000141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物治疗与心理咨询相结合,戒烟的机会增加了三倍。然而,这些药物的可及性受到其财务成本的限制。通过这篇综述,我们旨在证明部分或全部资助在疗效、有效性、成本效益和生活质量方面的影响。我们对上述问题的相关文章进行了文献检索:分析尼古丁依赖药物治疗的疗效、有效性和成本效益及其资助的影响。研究表明,资助药物治疗可以提高戒烟干预措施的疗效和有效性。这样的资助增加了人们尝试戒烟的动力。此外,这些策略可以提高自我效能,产生社会影响,改变对戒烟的态度。虽然药物治疗的资助对所有吸烟者都有利,但也有某些吸烟者对资助策略更敏感,如收入较低和受教育程度较低的社会群体。这些为戒烟干预措施提供资金的战略已被证明可以改善人口的健康和生活质量以及经济,同时减少烟草的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Funding Medications for Nicotine Dependence on Tobacco Control: A Narrative Review
Pharmacological treatments for smoking associated with psychological counseling triple the chances of quitting. However, the accessibility of these drugs is limited by their financial cost. With this review we aim to demonstrate the effect of partial or full funding in terms of efficacy, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and quality of life. We conducted a literature search for articles related to the issues mentioned above: analysis of the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pharmacological treatments for nicotine dependence and the effect of their funding. It is shown that the funding of pharmacological treatment can increase the efficacy and effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions. Such funding increases motivation to make a quit attempt. In addition, these strategies can increase self-efficacy, generate social influence and change attitudes toward quitting. Although the funding of pharmacological treatment benefits all smokers, there are certain populations of smokers who are more sensitive to funding strategies such as social groups with lower incomes and lower educational attainment. These funding strategies for smoking cessation interventions have been shown to improve the health and quality of life of the population, as well as the economy, while reducing tobacco use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Archives
Open Respiratory Archives Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信