跨文化取向的人工智能整合:对创造性自我效能感和员工自主性的纵向研究

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Deeviya Francis Xavier, Christian Korunka
{"title":"跨文化取向的人工智能整合:对创造性自我效能感和员工自主性的纵向研究","authors":"Deeviya Francis Xavier,&nbsp;Christian Korunka","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In a world where Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly prevalent, a growing discussion persists on how AI integration could affect one's beliefs and degree of control in executing specific tasks. This is especially relevant at the workplace, where psychological and cultural implications of technology integration can significantly influence employee behavior and overall organizational dynamics. In response to this issue, our longitudinal experimental study aims to explore the impact of AI integration and cultural orientation on perceived employee autonomy and creative self-efficacy. We formulated and tested four hypotheses to analyze the relationship between AI integration and employee perceptions within different cultural contexts—specifically individualistic cultures, represented by the United Kingdom, and collectivistic cultures, represented by Mexico. A total of 427 participants from professional sectors participated in this study that alternated tasks with and without AI integration, resulting in an analysis of changes in employee perceptions over time. The empirical findings revealed a positive interactive impact of AI integration on creative self-efficacy, particularly pronounced among participants from collectivistic cultures. Furthermore, reports on employee autonomy revealed a significant negative impact of AI integration in the overall sample. An exploratory gender-specific analysis further revealed significant differences in the impact of AI integration on employee autonomy, with male participants experiencing a more pronounced decrease than female participants. Our findings provide quantitative evidence on how AI integration impacts diverse employee groups, making a significant contribution to the research on ethical and societal considerations in the deployment of AI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100623"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating Artificial Intelligence across cultural orientations: A longitudinal examination of creative self-efficacy and employee autonomy\",\"authors\":\"Deeviya Francis Xavier,&nbsp;Christian Korunka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In a world where Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly prevalent, a growing discussion persists on how AI integration could affect one's beliefs and degree of control in executing specific tasks. This is especially relevant at the workplace, where psychological and cultural implications of technology integration can significantly influence employee behavior and overall organizational dynamics. In response to this issue, our longitudinal experimental study aims to explore the impact of AI integration and cultural orientation on perceived employee autonomy and creative self-efficacy. We formulated and tested four hypotheses to analyze the relationship between AI integration and employee perceptions within different cultural contexts—specifically individualistic cultures, represented by the United Kingdom, and collectivistic cultures, represented by Mexico. A total of 427 participants from professional sectors participated in this study that alternated tasks with and without AI integration, resulting in an analysis of changes in employee perceptions over time. The empirical findings revealed a positive interactive impact of AI integration on creative self-efficacy, particularly pronounced among participants from collectivistic cultures. Furthermore, reports on employee autonomy revealed a significant negative impact of AI integration in the overall sample. An exploratory gender-specific analysis further revealed significant differences in the impact of AI integration on employee autonomy, with male participants experiencing a more pronounced decrease than female participants. Our findings provide quantitative evidence on how AI integration impacts diverse employee groups, making a significant contribution to the research on ethical and societal considerations in the deployment of AI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100623\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in human behavior reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825000387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825000387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating Artificial Intelligence across cultural orientations: A longitudinal examination of creative self-efficacy and employee autonomy
In a world where Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly prevalent, a growing discussion persists on how AI integration could affect one's beliefs and degree of control in executing specific tasks. This is especially relevant at the workplace, where psychological and cultural implications of technology integration can significantly influence employee behavior and overall organizational dynamics. In response to this issue, our longitudinal experimental study aims to explore the impact of AI integration and cultural orientation on perceived employee autonomy and creative self-efficacy. We formulated and tested four hypotheses to analyze the relationship between AI integration and employee perceptions within different cultural contexts—specifically individualistic cultures, represented by the United Kingdom, and collectivistic cultures, represented by Mexico. A total of 427 participants from professional sectors participated in this study that alternated tasks with and without AI integration, resulting in an analysis of changes in employee perceptions over time. The empirical findings revealed a positive interactive impact of AI integration on creative self-efficacy, particularly pronounced among participants from collectivistic cultures. Furthermore, reports on employee autonomy revealed a significant negative impact of AI integration in the overall sample. An exploratory gender-specific analysis further revealed significant differences in the impact of AI integration on employee autonomy, with male participants experiencing a more pronounced decrease than female participants. Our findings provide quantitative evidence on how AI integration impacts diverse employee groups, making a significant contribution to the research on ethical and societal considerations in the deployment of AI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信