{"title":"不一致的绩效反馈与企业国际化:首席执行官能否消除阴霾?","authors":"Anita Kerai , Nycil George","doi":"10.1016/j.jwb.2025.101625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this paper, we investigate how CEO power moderates the relationship between inconsistent performance feedback and family firm internationalization. We argue that when faced with such ambiguity, internationalization is contingent on the CEOs’ ability derived from their sources of power. We test our hypotheses using a sample of Indian family firms from 2008 to 2015. We find that powerful CEOs choose self-enhancement over problemistic search and are less likely to pursue firm internationalization. Our results also show that when CEOs draw power from formal sources, they are more prone to cognitive biases and, thus, more likely to adopt self-enhancement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Business","volume":"60 3","pages":"Article 101625"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inconsistent performance feedback and firm internationalization: Can CEOs remove the haze?\",\"authors\":\"Anita Kerai , Nycil George\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jwb.2025.101625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this paper, we investigate how CEO power moderates the relationship between inconsistent performance feedback and family firm internationalization. We argue that when faced with such ambiguity, internationalization is contingent on the CEOs’ ability derived from their sources of power. We test our hypotheses using a sample of Indian family firms from 2008 to 2015. We find that powerful CEOs choose self-enhancement over problemistic search and are less likely to pursue firm internationalization. Our results also show that when CEOs draw power from formal sources, they are more prone to cognitive biases and, thus, more likely to adopt self-enhancement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Business\",\"volume\":\"60 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951625000148\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Business","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090951625000148","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inconsistent performance feedback and firm internationalization: Can CEOs remove the haze?
In this paper, we investigate how CEO power moderates the relationship between inconsistent performance feedback and family firm internationalization. We argue that when faced with such ambiguity, internationalization is contingent on the CEOs’ ability derived from their sources of power. We test our hypotheses using a sample of Indian family firms from 2008 to 2015. We find that powerful CEOs choose self-enhancement over problemistic search and are less likely to pursue firm internationalization. Our results also show that when CEOs draw power from formal sources, they are more prone to cognitive biases and, thus, more likely to adopt self-enhancement.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of World Business holds a distinguished position as a leading publication within the realm of International Business. Rooted in a legacy dating back to 1965, when it was established as the Columbia Journal of World Business, JWB is committed to disseminating cutting-edge research that reflects significant advancements in the field. The journal actively seeks submissions that propel new theoretical frameworks and innovative perspectives on International Business phenomena. Aligned with its domain statement, submissions are expected to possess a clear multinational, cross-border, or international comparative focus, while remaining pertinent to the study of management and organizations. JWB particularly encourages submissions that challenge established theories or assumptions, presenting pioneering or counterintuitive findings. With an inclusive approach, the journal welcomes contributions from diverse conceptual and theoretical traditions, encompassing allied social sciences and behavioral sciences. Submissions should either develop new theories or rigorously test existing ones, employing a variety of qualitative, quantitative, or other methodological approaches. While JWB primarily caters to scholars and researchers, it values contributions that explore implications for Multinational Enterprises and their management, as well as ramifications for public policy and the broader societal role of business.