Carmen S. Padilla, Sonia C. Irigoyen, Manikandan Ramasamy, Mona B. Damaj, Michelle M. Dominguez, Denise Rossi, Renesh H. Bedre, William O. Dawson, Choaa El-Mohtar, Michael S. Irey, Kranthi K. Mandadi
{"title":"天然存在的菠菜防御素赋予对柑橘绿化和马铃薯斑马片病的耐受性","authors":"Carmen S. Padilla, Sonia C. Irigoyen, Manikandan Ramasamy, Mona B. Damaj, Michelle M. Dominguez, Denise Rossi, Renesh H. Bedre, William O. Dawson, Choaa El-Mohtar, Michael S. Irey, Kranthi K. Mandadi","doi":"10.1111/pbi.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Citrus greening or Huanglongbing (HLB) and potato zebra chip (ZC) are devastating crop diseases worldwide (Mora <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>; Stelinski <i>et al</i>., <span>2024</span>). The diseases are associated with two related, fastidious (unculturable), phloem-limited bacteria, ‘<i>Candidatus</i> Liberibacter asiaticus’ (<i>C</i>Las) and ‘<i>Ca</i>. Liberibacter solanacearum’ (<i>C</i>Lso) that occurs in the United States. They are transmitted by the insect vector <i>Diaphorina citri</i> Kuwayama and <i>Bactericera cockerelli</i> (Sulc.), respectively (Mora <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>).</p><p>Defensins are short (~40 to 50 amino acids) basic, cysteine-rich peptides integral to the innate immune system in plants, animals, and insects and possess broad-spectrum inhibitory activity against bacterial and fungal pathogens (Cornet <i>et al</i>., <span>1995</span>; Velivelli <i>et al</i>., <span>2018</span>). Here, we evaluated whether overexpressing defensins from spinach in citrus and potato can confer tolerance to ‘<i>Ca</i>. Liberibacter spp.’ diseases.</p><p>First, we characterized defensin-encoding genes from spinach (<i>Spinacia oleracea</i>) (Mirkov and Mandadi, <span>2020</span>; Segura <i>et al</i>., <span>1998</span>). The spinach defensins (<i>So</i>AMPs) are evolutionarily closer to Group II defensins of <i>Arabidopsis</i>, rice and <i>Medicago</i> (Figure S1a). They possess the conserved Gamma-thionin/knottin-fold and multiple cysteine residues in the amino acid sequence (Figure S1b), and three characteristic antiparallel <i>β</i>-sheets and an <i>α</i>-helix, stabilized by disulfide bridges in the predicted ternary structure (Figure S1c) (Cornet <i>et al</i>., <span>1995</span>).</p><p>Next, we evaluated the efficacy of spinach defensins spp. using <i>Rhizobium rhizogenes</i>-mediated hairy root transformation (Irigoyen <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>). Transgene expression was driven under the <i>Cauliflower mosaic virus</i> (CaMV) 35S promoter in the ‘<i>Ca</i>. Liberibacter spp.’ infected hairy roots (Figure 1a) (Irigoyen <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>). Both <i>So</i>AMP1 and <i>So</i>AMP2 expressing hairy roots showed 71–99% reduction (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05 or <i>P</i> ≤ 0.01) of ‘<i>Ca</i>. Liberibacter spp.’ compared to negative controls (empty vector) (Figure 1b) (Table S1). Next, stable potato transgenic lines expressing <i>SoA</i>MP1 and <i>So</i>AMP2 were generated using the <i>Agrobacterium tumefaciens</i>-mediated plant transformation. Two independent transgenic lines and non-transformed (NT) plants (negative controls) were challenged with <i>C</i>Lso-carrying potato psyllids in controlled no-choice assays. The non-transformed plants developed characteristic zebra chip-associated shoot chlorosis and yellowing symptoms at 28 days post-infection (Figure 1c). Strikingly, the <i>So</i>AMP-expressing transgenic plants showed attenuated disease symptoms (Figure 1c), reduced <i>C</i>Lso titre (2.1–5.2% for <i>So</i>AMP1 and 10.3–37.9% for <i>So</i>AMP2) (Figure 1d), 53–130% greater tuber number (Figure 1e) and lower ZC-associated fried chip discoloration (Figure 1e), when compared to the non-transformed plants.</p><p>For citrus (var. Hamlin on Carrizo rootstock) evaluation, we utilized a <i>Citrus tristeza virus</i> (CTV) expression vector that is asymptomatic and a well-established transient citrus gene therapy system (El-Mohtar and Dawson, <span>2014</span>; Folimonov <i>et al</i>., <span>2007</span>). The <i>SoAMP1</i> (183 bp) and <i>SoAMP2</i> (252 bp) genes (Mirkov and Mandadi, <span>2020</span>) were cloned into a CTV (T36 strain) expression vector between p23/3’ UTR and p13/p20, respectively, followed by Agro-inoculation and grafting to citrus trees as described previously (Figure 1f) (El-Mohtar and Dawson, <span>2014</span>; Folimonov <i>et al</i>., <span>2007</span>). The trials were performed in a random-block design (<i>n</i> = 59–60 trees) in Florida fields under a naturally high HLB disease pressure. CTV and <i>So</i>AMP expression and stability were determined using ELISA and RT-PCR assays (El-Mohtar and Dawson, <span>2014</span>; Folimonov <i>et al</i>., <span>2007</span>). Approximately 22% of untreated trees (negative controls) tested positive for CTV, which was expected due to the natural exposure to endemic CTV (Table S2). However, none had any detectable <i>So</i>AMP expression, indicating no unintended gene transfer between the engineered and endemic CTV strains. Among the <i>So</i>AMP1 and <i>So</i>AMP2-treated trees, 55% and 80% tested positive for CTV, respectively. Of them, 71% and 88% showed stable <i>SoAMP1</i> and <i>SoAMP2</i> expression, respectively (Table S2). The <i>C</i>Las incidence was 63% and 57% in the <i>So</i>AMP1 and <i>So</i>AMP2-treated trees compared to 73% in the untreated trees (Table S2). At harvest, the yield of <i>So</i>AMP1 and <i>So</i>AMP2 trees was 40% and 50% greater than that of the untreated trees, respectively (Figure 1g). <i>So</i>AMP1 trees showed a 32% yield gain in the following year compared to the untreated trees, indicating a potential for multi-year benefits from a single CTV-AMP treatment (Figure 1g).</p><p>The mechanism of action of plant defensins against bacteria has not been widely investigated. Previously, a defensin from <i>M. truncatula</i> was shown to induce cell death of <i>Xanthomonas campestris</i> by permeabilization of the plasma membrane (Velivelli <i>et al</i>., <span>2018</span>). Because ‘<i>Ca</i>. Liberibacter spp.’ are unculturable, a closely related culturable surrogate, <i>Liberibacter crescens</i>, was used to assess the effects of spinach defensins on bacterial membranes. A cytotoxicity/viability assay was used to evaluate membrane permeabilization (Supplementary Methods S1). Briefly, <i>L. crescens</i> cells were incubated for 3 h with different concentrations of <i>So</i>AMP1 and <i>So</i>AMP2 (12.5 and 25 μg/mL), followed by a two-colour fluorescent dye staining (DMAO/EthD-III Dye) and fluorescent microscopy to visualize cell permeability and mortality rate. Both <i>So</i>AMP1 and <i>So</i>AMP2 induced ~2.5-fold greater cell permeability and mortality compared to untreated cells (negative control) (Figure 1h). In conclusion, based on <i>L. crescens</i> cytotoxicity data, the naturally occurring spinach defensins can inhibit ‘<i>Ca</i>. Liberibacter spp,’ by inducing cell permeability and mortality.</p><p>Humans, including sub-populations of infants and children, have a long history of natural exposure to spinach defensins through diet, and there are no reported toxicity or allergenicity concerns. Notably, the US EPA recently ruled that spinach defensins are safe for human consumption when used as a plant-incorporated protectant in citrus and granted a temporary tolerance exemption (EPA, <span>2021</span>), thus paving the way for their regulatory approval as sustainable products for plant disease management.</p><p>K.M. is a co-inventor on patents related to spinach defensins [US10,640,784], and W.O.D. is a co-inventor on patents related to the <i>Citrus tristeza virus vector</i> [US86,293,34]. Southern Gardens Citrus, a subsidiary of US Sugar (Clewiston, FL), has exclusive licensing rights, and Silvec Biologics (Gaithersburg, MD) has sub-licensing rights in these technologies for commercialization. Co-author M.S.I. (Southern Gardens Citrus) contributed significantly to the study design and the field trials in Florida. All other authors declare no competing interests.</p><p>K.M., W.O.D., C.M. and M.S.I. designed and supervised the experiments. C.S.P., S.I., M.B.D., M.R., D.R., M.M.D., R.B. and C.E.M. performed the experiments. All authors contributed to the data analysis and manuscript preparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":221,"journal":{"name":"Plant Biotechnology Journal","volume":"23 5","pages":"1876-1878"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/pbi.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Naturally occurring spinach defensins confer tolerance to citrus greening and potato zebra chip diseases\",\"authors\":\"Carmen S. Padilla, Sonia C. Irigoyen, Manikandan Ramasamy, Mona B. Damaj, Michelle M. Dominguez, Denise Rossi, Renesh H. Bedre, William O. Dawson, Choaa El-Mohtar, Michael S. Irey, Kranthi K. Mandadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pbi.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Citrus greening or Huanglongbing (HLB) and potato zebra chip (ZC) are devastating crop diseases worldwide (Mora <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>; Stelinski <i>et al</i>., <span>2024</span>). The diseases are associated with two related, fastidious (unculturable), phloem-limited bacteria, ‘<i>Candidatus</i> Liberibacter asiaticus’ (<i>C</i>Las) and ‘<i>Ca</i>. Liberibacter solanacearum’ (<i>C</i>Lso) that occurs in the United States. They are transmitted by the insect vector <i>Diaphorina citri</i> Kuwayama and <i>Bactericera cockerelli</i> (Sulc.), respectively (Mora <i>et al</i>., <span>2021</span>).</p><p>Defensins are short (~40 to 50 amino acids) basic, cysteine-rich peptides integral to the innate immune system in plants, animals, and insects and possess broad-spectrum inhibitory activity against bacterial and fungal pathogens (Cornet <i>et al</i>., <span>1995</span>; Velivelli <i>et al</i>., <span>2018</span>). Here, we evaluated whether overexpressing defensins from spinach in citrus and potato can confer tolerance to ‘<i>Ca</i>. Liberibacter spp.’ diseases.</p><p>First, we characterized defensin-encoding genes from spinach (<i>Spinacia oleracea</i>) (Mirkov and Mandadi, <span>2020</span>; Segura <i>et al</i>., <span>1998</span>). The spinach defensins (<i>So</i>AMPs) are evolutionarily closer to Group II defensins of <i>Arabidopsis</i>, rice and <i>Medicago</i> (Figure S1a). They possess the conserved Gamma-thionin/knottin-fold and multiple cysteine residues in the amino acid sequence (Figure S1b), and three characteristic antiparallel <i>β</i>-sheets and an <i>α</i>-helix, stabilized by disulfide bridges in the predicted ternary structure (Figure S1c) (Cornet <i>et al</i>., <span>1995</span>).</p><p>Next, we evaluated the efficacy of spinach defensins spp. using <i>Rhizobium rhizogenes</i>-mediated hairy root transformation (Irigoyen <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>). Transgene expression was driven under the <i>Cauliflower mosaic virus</i> (CaMV) 35S promoter in the ‘<i>Ca</i>. Liberibacter spp.’ infected hairy roots (Figure 1a) (Irigoyen <i>et al</i>., <span>2020</span>). Both <i>So</i>AMP1 and <i>So</i>AMP2 expressing hairy roots showed 71–99% reduction (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05 or <i>P</i> ≤ 0.01) of ‘<i>Ca</i>. Liberibacter spp.’ compared to negative controls (empty vector) (Figure 1b) (Table S1). Next, stable potato transgenic lines expressing <i>SoA</i>MP1 and <i>So</i>AMP2 were generated using the <i>Agrobacterium tumefaciens</i>-mediated plant transformation. Two independent transgenic lines and non-transformed (NT) plants (negative controls) were challenged with <i>C</i>Lso-carrying potato psyllids in controlled no-choice assays. The non-transformed plants developed characteristic zebra chip-associated shoot chlorosis and yellowing symptoms at 28 days post-infection (Figure 1c). Strikingly, the <i>So</i>AMP-expressing transgenic plants showed attenuated disease symptoms (Figure 1c), reduced <i>C</i>Lso titre (2.1–5.2% for <i>So</i>AMP1 and 10.3–37.9% for <i>So</i>AMP2) (Figure 1d), 53–130% greater tuber number (Figure 1e) and lower ZC-associated fried chip discoloration (Figure 1e), when compared to the non-transformed plants.</p><p>For citrus (var. Hamlin on Carrizo rootstock) evaluation, we utilized a <i>Citrus tristeza virus</i> (CTV) expression vector that is asymptomatic and a well-established transient citrus gene therapy system (El-Mohtar and Dawson, <span>2014</span>; Folimonov <i>et al</i>., <span>2007</span>). The <i>SoAMP1</i> (183 bp) and <i>SoAMP2</i> (252 bp) genes (Mirkov and Mandadi, <span>2020</span>) were cloned into a CTV (T36 strain) expression vector between p23/3’ UTR and p13/p20, respectively, followed by Agro-inoculation and grafting to citrus trees as described previously (Figure 1f) (El-Mohtar and Dawson, <span>2014</span>; Folimonov <i>et al</i>., <span>2007</span>). The trials were performed in a random-block design (<i>n</i> = 59–60 trees) in Florida fields under a naturally high HLB disease pressure. CTV and <i>So</i>AMP expression and stability were determined using ELISA and RT-PCR assays (El-Mohtar and Dawson, <span>2014</span>; Folimonov <i>et al</i>., <span>2007</span>). Approximately 22% of untreated trees (negative controls) tested positive for CTV, which was expected due to the natural exposure to endemic CTV (Table S2). However, none had any detectable <i>So</i>AMP expression, indicating no unintended gene transfer between the engineered and endemic CTV strains. Among the <i>So</i>AMP1 and <i>So</i>AMP2-treated trees, 55% and 80% tested positive for CTV, respectively. Of them, 71% and 88% showed stable <i>SoAMP1</i> and <i>SoAMP2</i> expression, respectively (Table S2). The <i>C</i>Las incidence was 63% and 57% in the <i>So</i>AMP1 and <i>So</i>AMP2-treated trees compared to 73% in the untreated trees (Table S2). At harvest, the yield of <i>So</i>AMP1 and <i>So</i>AMP2 trees was 40% and 50% greater than that of the untreated trees, respectively (Figure 1g). <i>So</i>AMP1 trees showed a 32% yield gain in the following year compared to the untreated trees, indicating a potential for multi-year benefits from a single CTV-AMP treatment (Figure 1g).</p><p>The mechanism of action of plant defensins against bacteria has not been widely investigated. Previously, a defensin from <i>M. truncatula</i> was shown to induce cell death of <i>Xanthomonas campestris</i> by permeabilization of the plasma membrane (Velivelli <i>et al</i>., <span>2018</span>). Because ‘<i>Ca</i>. Liberibacter spp.’ are unculturable, a closely related culturable surrogate, <i>Liberibacter crescens</i>, was used to assess the effects of spinach defensins on bacterial membranes. A cytotoxicity/viability assay was used to evaluate membrane permeabilization (Supplementary Methods S1). Briefly, <i>L. crescens</i> cells were incubated for 3 h with different concentrations of <i>So</i>AMP1 and <i>So</i>AMP2 (12.5 and 25 μg/mL), followed by a two-colour fluorescent dye staining (DMAO/EthD-III Dye) and fluorescent microscopy to visualize cell permeability and mortality rate. Both <i>So</i>AMP1 and <i>So</i>AMP2 induced ~2.5-fold greater cell permeability and mortality compared to untreated cells (negative control) (Figure 1h). In conclusion, based on <i>L. crescens</i> cytotoxicity data, the naturally occurring spinach defensins can inhibit ‘<i>Ca</i>. Liberibacter spp,’ by inducing cell permeability and mortality.</p><p>Humans, including sub-populations of infants and children, have a long history of natural exposure to spinach defensins through diet, and there are no reported toxicity or allergenicity concerns. Notably, the US EPA recently ruled that spinach defensins are safe for human consumption when used as a plant-incorporated protectant in citrus and granted a temporary tolerance exemption (EPA, <span>2021</span>), thus paving the way for their regulatory approval as sustainable products for plant disease management.</p><p>K.M. is a co-inventor on patents related to spinach defensins [US10,640,784], and W.O.D. is a co-inventor on patents related to the <i>Citrus tristeza virus vector</i> [US86,293,34]. Southern Gardens Citrus, a subsidiary of US Sugar (Clewiston, FL), has exclusive licensing rights, and Silvec Biologics (Gaithersburg, MD) has sub-licensing rights in these technologies for commercialization. Co-author M.S.I. (Southern Gardens Citrus) contributed significantly to the study design and the field trials in Florida. All other authors declare no competing interests.</p><p>K.M., W.O.D., C.M. and M.S.I. designed and supervised the experiments. C.S.P., S.I., M.B.D., M.R., D.R., M.M.D., R.B. and C.E.M. performed the experiments. All authors contributed to the data analysis and manuscript preparation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Biotechnology Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 5\",\"pages\":\"1876-1878\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/pbi.70013\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Biotechnology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pbi.70013\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Biotechnology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/pbi.70013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
柑橘黄龙病(HLB)和马铃薯斑马病(ZC)是世界范围内的破坏性作物病害(Mora等,2021;Stelinski et al., 2024)。这些疾病与两种相关的、挑剔的(不可培养的)韧皮部限制细菌有关,“亚洲自由候选菌”(CLas)和“Ca。solanacearum (CLso),发生在美国。它们分别由昆虫媒介citaphorina Kuwayama和Bactericera cockerelli (Sulc.)传播(Mora等人,2021)。防御素是一种短的(约40至50个氨基酸)碱性、富含半胱氨酸的多肽,是植物、动物和昆虫先天免疫系统的组成部分,对细菌和真菌病原体具有广谱抑制活性(Cornet等人,1995;Velivelli et al., 2018)。在这里,我们评估了柑橘和马铃薯中过度表达菠菜防御素是否能赋予对Ca的耐受性。自由杆菌类疾病。首先,我们鉴定了菠菜(Spinacia oleracea)的防御素编码基因(Mirkov and Mandadi, 2020;Segura et al., 1998)。菠菜防御素(soamp)在进化上更接近拟南芥、水稻和紫花苜蓿的II族防御素(图S1a)。它们在氨基酸序列中具有保守的γ -硫蛋白/结蛋白折叠和多个半胱氨酸残基(图S1b),以及三个特征的反平行β-片和α-螺旋,在预测的三元结构中由二硫桥稳定(图S1c) (Cornet et al., 1995)。接下来,我们利用根瘤菌介导的毛状根转化来评估菠菜防御素的功效(Irigoyen等,2020)。在花椰菜花叶病毒(CaMV) 35S启动子的驱动下,进行了基因表达。自由杆菌感染毛状根(图1a) (Irigoyen et al., 2020)。表达毛状根的SoAMP1和SoAMP2均能降低71 ~ 99%的Ca含量(P≤0.05或P≤0.01)。与阴性对照(空载体)相比(图1b)(表S1)。接下来,利用农杆菌介导的植物转化,获得了表达SoAMP1和SoAMP2的马铃薯稳定转基因品系。在对照无选择试验中,对两个独立的转基因品系和未转化(NT)植株(阴性对照)进行了携带clso的马铃薯木虱的侵染。未转化的植株在感染后28天出现斑马芯片相关的特征性茎部黄化和发黄症状(图1c)。引人注目的是,与未转化的植物相比,表达soamp的转基因植物表现出疾病症状减轻(图1c), CLso滴度降低(SoAMP1为2.1-5.2%,SoAMP2为10.3-37.9%)(图1d),块茎数量增加53-130%(图1e), zc相关的油炸片变色程度降低(图1e)。(a)分别在转化后30天和120天,用空载体(阴性对照)、SoAMP1或SoAMP2转化的健康、clso -马铃薯和clas -柑橘毛状根。利用绿色荧光蛋白报告基因对转基因毛状根进行筛选。比例尺= 1厘米。(b)毛状根中细菌的相对滴度。误差条表示±标准误差(n = 3-5个重复,student t检验)。(c)感染后28天(dpi), clso感染植物(箭头)的典型斑马片(ZC)相关症状。(d, e)转基因系和非转化对照CLso滴度、块茎数量和油炸ZC症状的定量分析。误差条表示±标准误差(n = 3-5, student t检验)。(f) CTV-AMP实地试验的工作流程。(g)连续两年ctv - soamp处理和未处理树木的果实产量。%表示较对照的产量增益(n = 59-60,学生t检验)。(h)皂酰胺对crescens自由杆菌活力的影响。表示膜受损细胞(红色)和死亡率%。比例尺= 10 μm。为了对Carrizo砧木上的柑橘(var. Hamlin)进行评估,我们使用了柑橘tristeza病毒(CTV)无症状表达载体和成熟的柑橘瞬态基因治疗系统(El-Mohtar和Dawson, 2014;Folimonov et al., 2007)。将SoAMP1 (183 bp)和SoAMP2 (252 bp)基因(Mirkov and Mandadi, 2020)分别克隆到p23/3 ' UTR和p13/p20之间的CTV (T36菌株)表达载体中,然后按照前面描述的方法进行农业接种和柑橘树嫁接(图1f) (El-Mohtar and Dawson, 2014;Folimonov et al., 2007)。试验采用随机区组设计(n = 59-60棵树),在自然高HLB病压条件下进行。采用ELISA和RT-PCR检测CTV和SoAMP的表达及稳定性(El-Mohtar和Dawson, 2014;Folimonov et al., 2007)。大约22%未经处理的树木(阴性对照)CTV检测呈阳性,这是由于自然暴露于地方性CTV而预期的(表S2)。 然而,没有任何可检测到的SoAMP表达,表明工程CTV菌株和地方性CTV菌株之间没有意外的基因转移。在SoAMP1和soamp2处理的树木中,分别有55%和80%的CTV检测呈阳性。其中SoAMP1和SoAMP2表达稳定的分别为71%和88%(表S2)。SoAMP1和soamp2处理的树木CLas发生率分别为63%和57%,而未经处理的树木为73%(表S2)。收获时,SoAMP1和SoAMP2树的产量分别比未处理树高40%和50%(图1g)。与未经处理的树木相比,SoAMP1树在第二年的产量增加了32%,这表明单次CTV-AMP处理可能会带来多年的收益(图1g)。植物防御素对细菌的作用机制尚未得到广泛的研究。此前,一种来自M. truncatula的防御素被证明可以通过渗透质膜诱导黄单胞菌的细胞死亡(Velivelli等人,2018)。因为“Ca。利比氏杆菌是不可培养的,一个密切相关的可培养替代物,利比氏杆菌,被用来评估菠菜防御素对细菌膜的影响。采用细胞毒性/活力测定法评价膜通透性(补充方法S1)。简单地说,用不同浓度的SoAMP1和SoAMP2(12.5和25 μg/mL)孵育L. crescens细胞3 h,然后用双色荧光染料(DMAO/EthD-III染料)染色和荧光显微镜观察细胞通透性和死亡率。与未处理的细胞(阴性对照)相比,SoAMP1和SoAMP2诱导的细胞通透性和死亡率都高出约2.5倍(图1h)。综上所述,基于L. crescenens细胞毒性数据,天然菠菜防御素具有抑制Ca的作用。通过诱导细胞通透性和死亡。人类,包括婴儿和儿童亚群,通过饮食自然接触菠菜防御素的历史很长,没有报道的毒性或过敏性问题。值得注意的是,美国环保署最近裁定,菠菜防御素在柑橘中作为植物结合的保护剂对人类食用是安全的,并授予临时耐受性豁免(EPA, 2021),从而为监管部门批准其作为植物疾病管理的可持续产品铺平了道路。
Naturally occurring spinach defensins confer tolerance to citrus greening and potato zebra chip diseases
Citrus greening or Huanglongbing (HLB) and potato zebra chip (ZC) are devastating crop diseases worldwide (Mora et al., 2021; Stelinski et al., 2024). The diseases are associated with two related, fastidious (unculturable), phloem-limited bacteria, ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ (CLas) and ‘Ca. Liberibacter solanacearum’ (CLso) that occurs in the United States. They are transmitted by the insect vector Diaphorina citri Kuwayama and Bactericera cockerelli (Sulc.), respectively (Mora et al., 2021).
Defensins are short (~40 to 50 amino acids) basic, cysteine-rich peptides integral to the innate immune system in plants, animals, and insects and possess broad-spectrum inhibitory activity against bacterial and fungal pathogens (Cornet et al., 1995; Velivelli et al., 2018). Here, we evaluated whether overexpressing defensins from spinach in citrus and potato can confer tolerance to ‘Ca. Liberibacter spp.’ diseases.
First, we characterized defensin-encoding genes from spinach (Spinacia oleracea) (Mirkov and Mandadi, 2020; Segura et al., 1998). The spinach defensins (SoAMPs) are evolutionarily closer to Group II defensins of Arabidopsis, rice and Medicago (Figure S1a). They possess the conserved Gamma-thionin/knottin-fold and multiple cysteine residues in the amino acid sequence (Figure S1b), and three characteristic antiparallel β-sheets and an α-helix, stabilized by disulfide bridges in the predicted ternary structure (Figure S1c) (Cornet et al., 1995).
Next, we evaluated the efficacy of spinach defensins spp. using Rhizobium rhizogenes-mediated hairy root transformation (Irigoyen et al., 2020). Transgene expression was driven under the Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter in the ‘Ca. Liberibacter spp.’ infected hairy roots (Figure 1a) (Irigoyen et al., 2020). Both SoAMP1 and SoAMP2 expressing hairy roots showed 71–99% reduction (P ≤ 0.05 or P ≤ 0.01) of ‘Ca. Liberibacter spp.’ compared to negative controls (empty vector) (Figure 1b) (Table S1). Next, stable potato transgenic lines expressing SoAMP1 and SoAMP2 were generated using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated plant transformation. Two independent transgenic lines and non-transformed (NT) plants (negative controls) were challenged with CLso-carrying potato psyllids in controlled no-choice assays. The non-transformed plants developed characteristic zebra chip-associated shoot chlorosis and yellowing symptoms at 28 days post-infection (Figure 1c). Strikingly, the SoAMP-expressing transgenic plants showed attenuated disease symptoms (Figure 1c), reduced CLso titre (2.1–5.2% for SoAMP1 and 10.3–37.9% for SoAMP2) (Figure 1d), 53–130% greater tuber number (Figure 1e) and lower ZC-associated fried chip discoloration (Figure 1e), when compared to the non-transformed plants.
For citrus (var. Hamlin on Carrizo rootstock) evaluation, we utilized a Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) expression vector that is asymptomatic and a well-established transient citrus gene therapy system (El-Mohtar and Dawson, 2014; Folimonov et al., 2007). The SoAMP1 (183 bp) and SoAMP2 (252 bp) genes (Mirkov and Mandadi, 2020) were cloned into a CTV (T36 strain) expression vector between p23/3’ UTR and p13/p20, respectively, followed by Agro-inoculation and grafting to citrus trees as described previously (Figure 1f) (El-Mohtar and Dawson, 2014; Folimonov et al., 2007). The trials were performed in a random-block design (n = 59–60 trees) in Florida fields under a naturally high HLB disease pressure. CTV and SoAMP expression and stability were determined using ELISA and RT-PCR assays (El-Mohtar and Dawson, 2014; Folimonov et al., 2007). Approximately 22% of untreated trees (negative controls) tested positive for CTV, which was expected due to the natural exposure to endemic CTV (Table S2). However, none had any detectable SoAMP expression, indicating no unintended gene transfer between the engineered and endemic CTV strains. Among the SoAMP1 and SoAMP2-treated trees, 55% and 80% tested positive for CTV, respectively. Of them, 71% and 88% showed stable SoAMP1 and SoAMP2 expression, respectively (Table S2). The CLas incidence was 63% and 57% in the SoAMP1 and SoAMP2-treated trees compared to 73% in the untreated trees (Table S2). At harvest, the yield of SoAMP1 and SoAMP2 trees was 40% and 50% greater than that of the untreated trees, respectively (Figure 1g). SoAMP1 trees showed a 32% yield gain in the following year compared to the untreated trees, indicating a potential for multi-year benefits from a single CTV-AMP treatment (Figure 1g).
The mechanism of action of plant defensins against bacteria has not been widely investigated. Previously, a defensin from M. truncatula was shown to induce cell death of Xanthomonas campestris by permeabilization of the plasma membrane (Velivelli et al., 2018). Because ‘Ca. Liberibacter spp.’ are unculturable, a closely related culturable surrogate, Liberibacter crescens, was used to assess the effects of spinach defensins on bacterial membranes. A cytotoxicity/viability assay was used to evaluate membrane permeabilization (Supplementary Methods S1). Briefly, L. crescens cells were incubated for 3 h with different concentrations of SoAMP1 and SoAMP2 (12.5 and 25 μg/mL), followed by a two-colour fluorescent dye staining (DMAO/EthD-III Dye) and fluorescent microscopy to visualize cell permeability and mortality rate. Both SoAMP1 and SoAMP2 induced ~2.5-fold greater cell permeability and mortality compared to untreated cells (negative control) (Figure 1h). In conclusion, based on L. crescens cytotoxicity data, the naturally occurring spinach defensins can inhibit ‘Ca. Liberibacter spp,’ by inducing cell permeability and mortality.
Humans, including sub-populations of infants and children, have a long history of natural exposure to spinach defensins through diet, and there are no reported toxicity or allergenicity concerns. Notably, the US EPA recently ruled that spinach defensins are safe for human consumption when used as a plant-incorporated protectant in citrus and granted a temporary tolerance exemption (EPA, 2021), thus paving the way for their regulatory approval as sustainable products for plant disease management.
K.M. is a co-inventor on patents related to spinach defensins [US10,640,784], and W.O.D. is a co-inventor on patents related to the Citrus tristeza virus vector [US86,293,34]. Southern Gardens Citrus, a subsidiary of US Sugar (Clewiston, FL), has exclusive licensing rights, and Silvec Biologics (Gaithersburg, MD) has sub-licensing rights in these technologies for commercialization. Co-author M.S.I. (Southern Gardens Citrus) contributed significantly to the study design and the field trials in Florida. All other authors declare no competing interests.
K.M., W.O.D., C.M. and M.S.I. designed and supervised the experiments. C.S.P., S.I., M.B.D., M.R., D.R., M.M.D., R.B. and C.E.M. performed the experiments. All authors contributed to the data analysis and manuscript preparation.
期刊介绍:
Plant Biotechnology Journal aspires to publish original research and insightful reviews of high impact, authored by prominent researchers in applied plant science. The journal places a special emphasis on molecular plant sciences and their practical applications through plant biotechnology. Our goal is to establish a platform for showcasing significant advances in the field, encompassing curiosity-driven studies with potential applications, strategic research in plant biotechnology, scientific analysis of crucial issues for the beneficial utilization of plant sciences, and assessments of the performance of plant biotechnology products in practical applications.