一种复杂的干预措施的发展,以支持镇静药物的使用专科姑息治疗(iSedPall)。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2024-11-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2024.0042
Saskia Kauzner, Manuela Schneider, Maria Heckel, Carsten Klein, Claudia Bausewein, Eva Schildmann, Jeremias Bazata, Stefanie Kolmhuber, Sabine H Krauss, Beatrice Odierna, Constanze Rémi, Jan Schildmann, Alexander Kremling, Christian Jäger, Kerstin Ziegler, Christoph Ostgathe
{"title":"一种复杂的干预措施的发展,以支持镇静药物的使用专科姑息治疗(iSedPall)。","authors":"Saskia Kauzner, Manuela Schneider, Maria Heckel, Carsten Klein, Claudia Bausewein, Eva Schildmann, Jeremias Bazata, Stefanie Kolmhuber, Sabine H Krauss, Beatrice Odierna, Constanze Rémi, Jan Schildmann, Alexander Kremling, Christian Jäger, Kerstin Ziegler, Christoph Ostgathe","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2024.0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The option of intentional sedation to relieve intolerable suffering from treatment-refractory symptoms may elicit a feeling of safety for patients and informal caregivers as a last resort if the situation becomes unbearable. Many health care professionals feel uncomfortable and insecure in conducting intentional sedation due to specific challenges. We developed a complex intervention to support best practice use of sedative drugs in specialist palliative care in Germany based on previously published recommendations. This article aims at reporting the development of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The development of the intervention was based on theory and existing evidence with active stakeholder participation and patient and public involvement, following the updated Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework on complex interventions. A \"Theory of Change,\" drawing on expert-approved best practice recommendations and applying user-centered methods, fostered the development. The process encompassed study preparation, development of the elements of the intervention, and designing the multimodal intervention. For reporting, we adhere to the Guidance for Reporting Intervention Development framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention is aimed at health care professionals working in specialist palliative care (inpatient and homecare settings) and consists of several components: (1) a screening tool, (2) the individual elements of the intervention, and (3) educational material for health care professionals to support them using the intervention. Additional information material was developed for patients and informal caregivers. Despite the benefits of stakeholder involvement, we faced some barriers due to limited health care staff and time resources and reservations regarding research in general.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A pilot study is planned for testing the overall feasibility of the intervention and exploring possible benefits for health care professionals to inform a subsequent fully powered implementation study. To deal with the challenges, we stayed in contact with the health care teams, maintained transparency, and provided opportunities for active participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":"5 1","pages":"527-536"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Complex Intervention to Support the Use of Sedative Drugs in Specialist Palliative Care (iSedPall).\",\"authors\":\"Saskia Kauzner, Manuela Schneider, Maria Heckel, Carsten Klein, Claudia Bausewein, Eva Schildmann, Jeremias Bazata, Stefanie Kolmhuber, Sabine H Krauss, Beatrice Odierna, Constanze Rémi, Jan Schildmann, Alexander Kremling, Christian Jäger, Kerstin Ziegler, Christoph Ostgathe\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/pmr.2024.0042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The option of intentional sedation to relieve intolerable suffering from treatment-refractory symptoms may elicit a feeling of safety for patients and informal caregivers as a last resort if the situation becomes unbearable. Many health care professionals feel uncomfortable and insecure in conducting intentional sedation due to specific challenges. We developed a complex intervention to support best practice use of sedative drugs in specialist palliative care in Germany based on previously published recommendations. This article aims at reporting the development of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The development of the intervention was based on theory and existing evidence with active stakeholder participation and patient and public involvement, following the updated Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework on complex interventions. A \\\"Theory of Change,\\\" drawing on expert-approved best practice recommendations and applying user-centered methods, fostered the development. The process encompassed study preparation, development of the elements of the intervention, and designing the multimodal intervention. For reporting, we adhere to the Guidance for Reporting Intervention Development framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention is aimed at health care professionals working in specialist palliative care (inpatient and homecare settings) and consists of several components: (1) a screening tool, (2) the individual elements of the intervention, and (3) educational material for health care professionals to support them using the intervention. Additional information material was developed for patients and informal caregivers. Despite the benefits of stakeholder involvement, we faced some barriers due to limited health care staff and time resources and reservations regarding research in general.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A pilot study is planned for testing the overall feasibility of the intervention and exploring possible benefits for health care professionals to inform a subsequent fully powered implementation study. To deal with the challenges, we stayed in contact with the health care teams, maintained transparency, and provided opportunities for active participation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative medicine reports\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"527-536\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864855/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative medicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2024.0042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2024.0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:选择故意镇静来缓解治疗难治性症状带来的难以忍受的痛苦,可能会给患者和非正式护理人员带来一种安全感,如果情况变得无法忍受,这是最后的手段。由于特殊的挑战,许多卫生保健专业人员在进行故意镇静时感到不舒服和不安全。我们根据先前发表的建议,开发了一种复杂的干预措施,以支持在德国专科姑息治疗中使用镇静药物的最佳实践。本文旨在报道干预的发展。方法:根据最新的医学研究委员会(MRC)复杂干预框架,在利益相关者积极参与、患者和公众积极参与的基础上,以理论和现有证据为基础制定干预措施。“变革理论”借鉴了专家认可的最佳实践建议,并应用了以用户为中心的方法,促进了开发。该过程包括研究准备、干预要素的开发和多模式干预的设计。在报告方面,我们遵循《报告干预措施发展框架指南》。结果:该干预措施针对的是从事专科姑息治疗(住院和家庭护理)的卫生保健专业人员,包括几个组成部分:(1)筛查工具,(2)干预措施的个别要素,以及(3)卫生保健专业人员使用干预措施的教育材料。为病人和非正式护理人员编写了额外的信息材料。尽管利益相关者的参与有好处,但由于卫生保健人员和时间资源有限以及对一般研究的保留,我们面临一些障碍。讨论:计划进行一项试点研究,以测试干预措施的总体可行性,并探索卫生保健专业人员可能获得的益处,以便为随后的全面实施研究提供信息。为了应对这些挑战,我们与医疗团队保持联系,保持透明度,并提供积极参与的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Complex Intervention to Support the Use of Sedative Drugs in Specialist Palliative Care (iSedPall).

Background: The option of intentional sedation to relieve intolerable suffering from treatment-refractory symptoms may elicit a feeling of safety for patients and informal caregivers as a last resort if the situation becomes unbearable. Many health care professionals feel uncomfortable and insecure in conducting intentional sedation due to specific challenges. We developed a complex intervention to support best practice use of sedative drugs in specialist palliative care in Germany based on previously published recommendations. This article aims at reporting the development of the intervention.

Methods: The development of the intervention was based on theory and existing evidence with active stakeholder participation and patient and public involvement, following the updated Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework on complex interventions. A "Theory of Change," drawing on expert-approved best practice recommendations and applying user-centered methods, fostered the development. The process encompassed study preparation, development of the elements of the intervention, and designing the multimodal intervention. For reporting, we adhere to the Guidance for Reporting Intervention Development framework.

Results: The intervention is aimed at health care professionals working in specialist palliative care (inpatient and homecare settings) and consists of several components: (1) a screening tool, (2) the individual elements of the intervention, and (3) educational material for health care professionals to support them using the intervention. Additional information material was developed for patients and informal caregivers. Despite the benefits of stakeholder involvement, we faced some barriers due to limited health care staff and time resources and reservations regarding research in general.

Discussion: A pilot study is planned for testing the overall feasibility of the intervention and exploring possible benefits for health care professionals to inform a subsequent fully powered implementation study. To deal with the challenges, we stayed in contact with the health care teams, maintained transparency, and provided opportunities for active participation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信