在学术和非学术背景下支持研究人员在情感要求高的研究中保持心理健康的最佳做法。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Mary L Quinton, Karen L Shepherd, Jennifer Cumming, Grace Tidmarsh, Maria R Dauvermann, Sian L Griffiths, Sally Reynard, Amanda Skeate, Anita Fernandes, Tasneem Choucair, James Downs, Karen Harrison Dening, Meghan H McDonough, Lizzie Mitchell, Daniel J A Rhind, Charlie Tresadern
{"title":"在学术和非学术背景下支持研究人员在情感要求高的研究中保持心理健康的最佳做法。","authors":"Mary L Quinton, Karen L Shepherd, Jennifer Cumming, Grace Tidmarsh, Maria R Dauvermann, Sian L Griffiths, Sally Reynard, Amanda Skeate, Anita Fernandes, Tasneem Choucair, James Downs, Karen Harrison Dening, Meghan H McDonough, Lizzie Mitchell, Daniel J A Rhind, Charlie Tresadern","doi":"10.1080/17482631.2025.2464380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Researcher mental health in emotionally demanding research (EDR) has been recognized as important, but research to date has often been limited to academic research contexts, qualitative research, or single disciplines. The aim of this study was to identify best practices to promote researchers' mental health in EDR across academic and non-academic contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six researchers experienced in EDR (aged 33-64) were recruited across sectors and disciplines (e.g. sport psychology, palliative care, conflict resolution). Semi-structured online 2:1 interviews were conducted between October 2023 and January 2024. The co-designed interview guide asked questions on best practices at individual and contextual levels when undertaking EDR. Interviews were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were generated: (1) the need for a psychologically informed research culture; (2) actions and principles in the immediate research environment; and (3) researcher boundaries with the research, others, and oneself. Underlying mechanisms across themes included tailored, iterative and flexible, and collaborative.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A shift is needed towards a more psychologically informed research culture to support mental health in EDR. Findings have implications for research organizations, conference organizers, and funders as greater resources are needed for researchers in EDR, regardless of method, discipline, or sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":51468,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","volume":"20 1","pages":"2464380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best practices for supporting researchers' mental health in emotionally demanding research across academic and non-academic contexts.\",\"authors\":\"Mary L Quinton, Karen L Shepherd, Jennifer Cumming, Grace Tidmarsh, Maria R Dauvermann, Sian L Griffiths, Sally Reynard, Amanda Skeate, Anita Fernandes, Tasneem Choucair, James Downs, Karen Harrison Dening, Meghan H McDonough, Lizzie Mitchell, Daniel J A Rhind, Charlie Tresadern\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17482631.2025.2464380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Researcher mental health in emotionally demanding research (EDR) has been recognized as important, but research to date has often been limited to academic research contexts, qualitative research, or single disciplines. The aim of this study was to identify best practices to promote researchers' mental health in EDR across academic and non-academic contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six researchers experienced in EDR (aged 33-64) were recruited across sectors and disciplines (e.g. sport psychology, palliative care, conflict resolution). Semi-structured online 2:1 interviews were conducted between October 2023 and January 2024. The co-designed interview guide asked questions on best practices at individual and contextual levels when undertaking EDR. Interviews were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were generated: (1) the need for a psychologically informed research culture; (2) actions and principles in the immediate research environment; and (3) researcher boundaries with the research, others, and oneself. Underlying mechanisms across themes included tailored, iterative and flexible, and collaborative.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A shift is needed towards a more psychologically informed research culture to support mental health in EDR. Findings have implications for research organizations, conference organizers, and funders as greater resources are needed for researchers in EDR, regardless of method, discipline, or sector.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"2464380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866648/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2025.2464380\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2025.2464380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:研究者心理健康在情感需求研究(EDR)中的重要性已被公认,但迄今为止的研究往往局限于学术研究背景、定性研究或单一学科。本研究的目的是确定在学术和非学术背景下促进EDR研究人员心理健康的最佳实践。方法:招募了26名具有EDR经验的研究人员(年龄33-64岁),他们来自不同部门和学科(如运动心理学、姑息治疗、冲突解决)。半结构化在线2:1访谈于2023年10月至2024年1月进行。共同设计的面试指南询问了在进行电子数据记录时在个人和环境层面的最佳做法。访谈通过反身性主题分析进行分析。结果:产生了三个主题:(1)需要一个心理知情的研究文化;(2)在直接研究环境中的行动和原则;(3)研究人员与研究对象、他人和自己的界限。跨主题的潜在机制包括定制、迭代和灵活以及协作。结论:需要向更加了解心理的研究文化转变,以支持EDR中的心理健康。研究结果对研究机构、会议组织者和资助者都有影响,因为EDR研究人员需要更多的资源,无论其方法、学科或部门如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Best practices for supporting researchers' mental health in emotionally demanding research across academic and non-academic contexts.

Purpose: Researcher mental health in emotionally demanding research (EDR) has been recognized as important, but research to date has often been limited to academic research contexts, qualitative research, or single disciplines. The aim of this study was to identify best practices to promote researchers' mental health in EDR across academic and non-academic contexts.

Methods: Twenty-six researchers experienced in EDR (aged 33-64) were recruited across sectors and disciplines (e.g. sport psychology, palliative care, conflict resolution). Semi-structured online 2:1 interviews were conducted between October 2023 and January 2024. The co-designed interview guide asked questions on best practices at individual and contextual levels when undertaking EDR. Interviews were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Three themes were generated: (1) the need for a psychologically informed research culture; (2) actions and principles in the immediate research environment; and (3) researcher boundaries with the research, others, and oneself. Underlying mechanisms across themes included tailored, iterative and flexible, and collaborative.

Conclusions: A shift is needed towards a more psychologically informed research culture to support mental health in EDR. Findings have implications for research organizations, conference organizers, and funders as greater resources are needed for researchers in EDR, regardless of method, discipline, or sector.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
99
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being acknowledges the international and interdisciplinary nature of health-related issues. It intends to provide a meeting-point for studies using rigorous qualitative methodology of significance for issues related to human health and well-being. The aim of the International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being is to support and to shape the emerging field of qualitative studies and to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of human health and well-being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信