对背内侧前额叶皮层的脑刺激会影响元认知偏差,但不会影响心智化。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Rebekka S Mattes, Alexander Soutschek
{"title":"对背内侧前额叶皮层的脑刺激会影响元认知偏差,但不会影响心智化。","authors":"Rebekka S Mattes, Alexander Soutschek","doi":"10.3758/s13415-025-01277-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the importance of metacognition for everyday decision-making, its neural substrates are far from understood. Recent neuroimaging studies linked metacognitive processes to dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), a region known to be involved in monitoring task difficulty. dmPFC is also thought to be involved in mentalising, consistent with theoretical accounts of metacognition as a self-directed subform of mentalising. However, it is unclear whether, and if so how, dmPFC causally affects metacognitive judgements, and whether this can be explained by a more general role of dmPFC for mentalising. To test this, participants performed two tasks targeting metacognition in perceptual decisions and mentalising whilst undergoing excitatory anodal versus sham dmPFC tDCS. dmPFC tDCS significantly decreased subjective confidence reports while leaving first-level performance in accuracy and reaction times unaffected, suggesting a causal contribution of dmPFC to representing metacognitive bias. Furthermore, we found no effect of dmPFC tDCS on neither metacognitive sensitivity and efficiency nor on mentalising, providing no evidence for an overlap between perceptual metacognition and mentalising in the dmPFC. Together, our findings highlight the dmPFC's causal role in metacognition by representing subjective confidence during evaluations of cognitive performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain stimulation over dorsomedial prefrontal cortex causally affects metacognitive bias but not mentalising.\",\"authors\":\"Rebekka S Mattes, Alexander Soutschek\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13415-025-01277-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the importance of metacognition for everyday decision-making, its neural substrates are far from understood. Recent neuroimaging studies linked metacognitive processes to dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), a region known to be involved in monitoring task difficulty. dmPFC is also thought to be involved in mentalising, consistent with theoretical accounts of metacognition as a self-directed subform of mentalising. However, it is unclear whether, and if so how, dmPFC causally affects metacognitive judgements, and whether this can be explained by a more general role of dmPFC for mentalising. To test this, participants performed two tasks targeting metacognition in perceptual decisions and mentalising whilst undergoing excitatory anodal versus sham dmPFC tDCS. dmPFC tDCS significantly decreased subjective confidence reports while leaving first-level performance in accuracy and reaction times unaffected, suggesting a causal contribution of dmPFC to representing metacognitive bias. Furthermore, we found no effect of dmPFC tDCS on neither metacognitive sensitivity and efficiency nor on mentalising, providing no evidence for an overlap between perceptual metacognition and mentalising in the dmPFC. Together, our findings highlight the dmPFC's causal role in metacognition by representing subjective confidence during evaluations of cognitive performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01277-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01277-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管元认知在日常决策中的重要性,但其神经基础还远未被理解。最近的神经影像学研究将元认知过程与背内侧前额叶皮层(dmPFC)联系起来,这是一个已知参与监测任务难度的区域。dmPFC也被认为与心智化有关,这与元认知作为心智化的自我导向子形式的理论解释相一致。然而,目前尚不清楚dmPFC是否,如果是,如何影响元认知判断,以及这是否可以用dmPFC在心智化中更普遍的作用来解释。为了验证这一点,参与者在经历兴奋性阳极和假性dmPFC tDCS时,执行了两个针对知觉决策和心智化的元认知任务。dmPFC tDCS显著降低了主观信心报告,而在准确性和反应时间方面的一级表现不受影响,这表明dmPFC对元认知偏差的因果贡献。此外,我们发现dmPFC tDCS对元认知的敏感性和效率以及心智化都没有影响,因此没有证据表明知觉元认知和心智化在dmPFC中存在重叠。总之,我们的研究结果强调了dmPFC在元认知中的因果作用,它代表了认知表现评估中的主观信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brain stimulation over dorsomedial prefrontal cortex causally affects metacognitive bias but not mentalising.

Despite the importance of metacognition for everyday decision-making, its neural substrates are far from understood. Recent neuroimaging studies linked metacognitive processes to dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), a region known to be involved in monitoring task difficulty. dmPFC is also thought to be involved in mentalising, consistent with theoretical accounts of metacognition as a self-directed subform of mentalising. However, it is unclear whether, and if so how, dmPFC causally affects metacognitive judgements, and whether this can be explained by a more general role of dmPFC for mentalising. To test this, participants performed two tasks targeting metacognition in perceptual decisions and mentalising whilst undergoing excitatory anodal versus sham dmPFC tDCS. dmPFC tDCS significantly decreased subjective confidence reports while leaving first-level performance in accuracy and reaction times unaffected, suggesting a causal contribution of dmPFC to representing metacognitive bias. Furthermore, we found no effect of dmPFC tDCS on neither metacognitive sensitivity and efficiency nor on mentalising, providing no evidence for an overlap between perceptual metacognition and mentalising in the dmPFC. Together, our findings highlight the dmPFC's causal role in metacognition by representing subjective confidence during evaluations of cognitive performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信