用非甾体抗炎药自我治疗和购买品牌和非处方药:秘鲁一项全国调查的分析。

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Public Health Research Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/22799036251319154
Jerry K Benites-Meza, Liseth Pinedo-Castillo, Miguel Cabanillas-Lazo, María A Boyd-Gamarra, Percy Herrera-Añazco, Benoit Mougenot, Vicente A Benites-Zapata
{"title":"用非甾体抗炎药自我治疗和购买品牌和非处方药:秘鲁一项全国调查的分析。","authors":"Jerry K Benites-Meza, Liseth Pinedo-Castillo, Miguel Cabanillas-Lazo, María A Boyd-Gamarra, Percy Herrera-Añazco, Benoit Mougenot, Vicente A Benites-Zapata","doi":"10.1177/22799036251319154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to determine the association between self-medications with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the purchase of branded and over-the-counter medications in Peru.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>This secondary analysis used a representative survey of Peru from 2014 to 2016. The exposure variable was self-medication with NSAIDs, defined as \"the purchase of NSAIDs for oneself without a prescription.\" The outcome was the purchase of branded and over-the-counter medications. Crude prevalence ratios (cPR) and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total of 2158 participants, 52.80% were women with an average age of 40.24 years. The prevalence of self-medication with NSAIDs was 68.21%, whereas the rates of purchasing branded and over-the-counter medications were 63.78% and 13.16%, respectively. The adjusted Poisson regression analysis showed an association between self-medication with NSAIDs and the purchase of branded (aPR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.12-1.25; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and over-the-counter (aPR = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.95-2.90; <i>p</i> < 0.001) medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approximately 7/10 users who self-medicate with NSAIDs chose branded medications, whereas nearly 1/5 opt for over-the-counter medications. Self-medication with NSAIDs was associated with a higher likelihood of purchasing branded and over-the-counter medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"22799036251319154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-medication with NSAIDs and purchase of branded and over-the-counter medicines: Analysis of a national survey in Peru.\",\"authors\":\"Jerry K Benites-Meza, Liseth Pinedo-Castillo, Miguel Cabanillas-Lazo, María A Boyd-Gamarra, Percy Herrera-Añazco, Benoit Mougenot, Vicente A Benites-Zapata\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22799036251319154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to determine the association between self-medications with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the purchase of branded and over-the-counter medications in Peru.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>This secondary analysis used a representative survey of Peru from 2014 to 2016. The exposure variable was self-medication with NSAIDs, defined as \\\"the purchase of NSAIDs for oneself without a prescription.\\\" The outcome was the purchase of branded and over-the-counter medications. Crude prevalence ratios (cPR) and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total of 2158 participants, 52.80% were women with an average age of 40.24 years. The prevalence of self-medication with NSAIDs was 68.21%, whereas the rates of purchasing branded and over-the-counter medications were 63.78% and 13.16%, respectively. The adjusted Poisson regression analysis showed an association between self-medication with NSAIDs and the purchase of branded (aPR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.12-1.25; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and over-the-counter (aPR = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.95-2.90; <i>p</i> < 0.001) medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approximately 7/10 users who self-medicate with NSAIDs chose branded medications, whereas nearly 1/5 opt for over-the-counter medications. Self-medication with NSAIDs was associated with a higher likelihood of purchasing branded and over-the-counter medications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"22799036251319154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863223/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251319154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251319154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在确定在秘鲁自行服用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)与购买品牌和非处方药之间的关系。设计和方法:本二次分析采用了2014 - 2016年秘鲁代表性调查。暴露变量是使用非甾体抗炎药的自我用药,定义为“没有处方为自己购买非甾体抗炎药”。其结果是购买品牌和非处方药。计算粗患病率(cPR)和校正患病率(aPR)及其各自的95%置信区间(95% CI)。结果:2158名参与者中,女性占52.80%,平均年龄40.24岁。使用非甾体抗炎药自行用药的比例为68.21%,购买品牌药和非处方药的比例分别为63.78%和13.16%。经校正泊松回归分析显示,自我使用非甾体抗炎药与购买品牌药之间存在相关性(aPR = 1.18;95% ci: 1.12-1.25;结论:大约7/10的自我使用非甾体抗炎药的用户选择品牌药物,而近1/5的人选择非处方药。使用非甾体抗炎药自我治疗与购买品牌和非处方药的可能性较高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-medication with NSAIDs and purchase of branded and over-the-counter medicines: Analysis of a national survey in Peru.

Background: This study aimed to determine the association between self-medications with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the purchase of branded and over-the-counter medications in Peru.

Design and methods: This secondary analysis used a representative survey of Peru from 2014 to 2016. The exposure variable was self-medication with NSAIDs, defined as "the purchase of NSAIDs for oneself without a prescription." The outcome was the purchase of branded and over-the-counter medications. Crude prevalence ratios (cPR) and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated.

Results: Of the total of 2158 participants, 52.80% were women with an average age of 40.24 years. The prevalence of self-medication with NSAIDs was 68.21%, whereas the rates of purchasing branded and over-the-counter medications were 63.78% and 13.16%, respectively. The adjusted Poisson regression analysis showed an association between self-medication with NSAIDs and the purchase of branded (aPR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.12-1.25; p < 0.001) and over-the-counter (aPR = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.95-2.90; p < 0.001) medications.

Conclusions: Approximately 7/10 users who self-medicate with NSAIDs chose branded medications, whereas nearly 1/5 opt for over-the-counter medications. Self-medication with NSAIDs was associated with a higher likelihood of purchasing branded and over-the-counter medications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Research
Journal of Public Health Research PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信