“看到你的感觉”:视觉尺度距离对触觉-视觉跨模匹配的影响。

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
I-Perception Pub Date : 2025-02-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20416695251318591
Olga Daneyko, Francesca Frisco, Angelo Maravita, Daniele Zavagno
{"title":"“看到你的感觉”:视觉尺度距离对触觉-视觉跨模匹配的影响。","authors":"Olga Daneyko, Francesca Frisco, Angelo Maravita, Daniele Zavagno","doi":"10.1177/20416695251318591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two experiments were conducted to explore the impact of the distance of a visual scale employed in the crossmodal matching method dubbed <i>See What You Feel</i> (SWYF) used to study the Uznadze haptic aftereffect. Previous studies reported that SWYF leads to a general underestimation of out-of-sight handheld spheres, which seems to increase with visual scale distance. Experiment 1 tested the effect of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching. A 19-step visual scale, made of actual 3D spheres (diameters ranging from 2.0 to 5.6 cm), was set at one of three possible distances (30, 160, 290 cm); participants' task was to find the matching visual spheres for four out-of-sight handheld test spheres (diameters 3.0, 3.8, 4.6, 5.0 cm). Results confirmed the underestimation effect and only partially confirmed the role of scale distance. Experiment 2 investigated the role of scale distance in a visual-to-visual matching task in which the same visual scale was employed, set at one of three distances (37, 160, 290 cm). Participants' task was to find a match for the same four test stimuli. Results showed no statistical difference between matched and actual sphere sizes with distance 37 cm; underestimations were observed with the far distances, thus reflecting overestimations of scale sphere sizes. Results from both experiments allow us to conclude that the underestimation effect observed with SWYF is a general feature of haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching, and that the SWYF method is a valuable tool for measuring haptic size perception with handheld stimuli when the visual scale is set at a visually comfortable peripersonal distance.</p>","PeriodicalId":47194,"journal":{"name":"I-Perception","volume":"16 1","pages":"20416695251318591"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11860285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'See what you feel': The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching.\",\"authors\":\"Olga Daneyko, Francesca Frisco, Angelo Maravita, Daniele Zavagno\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20416695251318591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Two experiments were conducted to explore the impact of the distance of a visual scale employed in the crossmodal matching method dubbed <i>See What You Feel</i> (SWYF) used to study the Uznadze haptic aftereffect. Previous studies reported that SWYF leads to a general underestimation of out-of-sight handheld spheres, which seems to increase with visual scale distance. Experiment 1 tested the effect of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching. A 19-step visual scale, made of actual 3D spheres (diameters ranging from 2.0 to 5.6 cm), was set at one of three possible distances (30, 160, 290 cm); participants' task was to find the matching visual spheres for four out-of-sight handheld test spheres (diameters 3.0, 3.8, 4.6, 5.0 cm). Results confirmed the underestimation effect and only partially confirmed the role of scale distance. Experiment 2 investigated the role of scale distance in a visual-to-visual matching task in which the same visual scale was employed, set at one of three distances (37, 160, 290 cm). Participants' task was to find a match for the same four test stimuli. Results showed no statistical difference between matched and actual sphere sizes with distance 37 cm; underestimations were observed with the far distances, thus reflecting overestimations of scale sphere sizes. Results from both experiments allow us to conclude that the underestimation effect observed with SWYF is a general feature of haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching, and that the SWYF method is a valuable tool for measuring haptic size perception with handheld stimuli when the visual scale is set at a visually comfortable peripersonal distance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"I-Perception\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"20416695251318591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11860285/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"I-Perception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251318591\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I-Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251318591","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了研究乌兹纳泽触觉后效,我们进行了两个实验,以探索视觉尺度距离对跨模匹配方法(See What You Feel, SWYF)的影响。先前的研究报道SWYF导致了视线外手持球体的普遍低估,这似乎随着视觉尺度距离的增加而增加。实验1检验了视觉尺度距离对触觉-视觉跨模匹配的影响。由实际的3D球体(直径从2.0厘米到5.6厘米)组成的19步视觉尺度被设置在三种可能的距离(30、160、290厘米)之一;参与者的任务是为四个视线外的手持式测试球体(直径3.0,3.8,4.6,5.0 cm)找到匹配的视觉球体。结果证实了低估效应,仅部分证实了尺度距离的作用。实验2研究了尺度距离在视觉-视觉匹配任务中的作用,该任务采用相同的视觉尺度,设置为3种距离(37、160、290 cm)之一。参与者的任务是为同样的四个测试刺激找到一个匹配。结果显示,当球距为37 cm时,匹配球尺寸与实际球尺寸无统计学差异;在较远的距离上观测到低估,从而反映了尺度球体尺寸的高估。这两个实验的结果都表明,SWYF方法观察到的低估效应是触觉-视觉跨模态匹配的一个普遍特征,并且当视觉尺度设置在视觉舒适的近个人距离时,SWYF方法是测量手持刺激触觉尺寸感知的一个有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

'See what you feel': The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching.

'See what you feel': The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching.

'See what you feel': The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching.

'See what you feel': The impact of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching.

Two experiments were conducted to explore the impact of the distance of a visual scale employed in the crossmodal matching method dubbed See What You Feel (SWYF) used to study the Uznadze haptic aftereffect. Previous studies reported that SWYF leads to a general underestimation of out-of-sight handheld spheres, which seems to increase with visual scale distance. Experiment 1 tested the effect of visual scale distance in haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching. A 19-step visual scale, made of actual 3D spheres (diameters ranging from 2.0 to 5.6 cm), was set at one of three possible distances (30, 160, 290 cm); participants' task was to find the matching visual spheres for four out-of-sight handheld test spheres (diameters 3.0, 3.8, 4.6, 5.0 cm). Results confirmed the underestimation effect and only partially confirmed the role of scale distance. Experiment 2 investigated the role of scale distance in a visual-to-visual matching task in which the same visual scale was employed, set at one of three distances (37, 160, 290 cm). Participants' task was to find a match for the same four test stimuli. Results showed no statistical difference between matched and actual sphere sizes with distance 37 cm; underestimations were observed with the far distances, thus reflecting overestimations of scale sphere sizes. Results from both experiments allow us to conclude that the underestimation effect observed with SWYF is a general feature of haptic-to-visual crossmodal matching, and that the SWYF method is a valuable tool for measuring haptic size perception with handheld stimuli when the visual scale is set at a visually comfortable peripersonal distance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
I-Perception
I-Perception PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信