单目模糊会影响光流对航向的判断。

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
I-Perception Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20416695251317148
William E A Sheppard, Rachel O Coats, Richard M Wilkie, Rigmor C Baraas
{"title":"单目模糊会影响光流对航向的判断。","authors":"William E A Sheppard, Rachel O Coats, Richard M Wilkie, Rigmor C Baraas","doi":"10.1177/20416695251317148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monocular blur sometimes impairs locomotion; however, it is not always clear when this will happen. Optic flow (the apparent motion of scene texture elements that occurs during self-motion) provides powerful signals about the direction of travel. Here, we test whether monocular blur impairs heading perception from optic flow compared to full vision under various levels of optic flow degradation. Participants (<i>N</i> = 52, mean age = 30 years) completed contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and heading perception tasks with rich or degraded optic flow, with or without monocular blur (0.4 logMAR Bangerter filter over the non-dominant eye, full vision in the dominant eye). Heading perception was assessed using a browser-based task where the participants viewed a 3-second video consistent with self-motion over a textured ground plane (moving towards the horizon at an offset heading ranging from -20 to +20°) and identified the point on the horizon towards which they were travelling. The measures of each participant's performance were the absolute and directional angular error between the heading offset and their response. Monocular blur and degraded flow were associated with an increase in absolute heading error and a larger underestimation of heading angle, with the worst performance observed when monocular blur and degraded flow were combined. These results suggest that the impact of monocular blur on heading perception becomes apparent only when optic flow signals are weak (e.g., night-time driving). These findings support the theory that monocular blur and the richness of visual information interact to produce deficits in heading perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":47194,"journal":{"name":"I-Perception","volume":"16 1","pages":"20416695251317148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monocular blur impairs heading judgements from optic flow.\",\"authors\":\"William E A Sheppard, Rachel O Coats, Richard M Wilkie, Rigmor C Baraas\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20416695251317148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Monocular blur sometimes impairs locomotion; however, it is not always clear when this will happen. Optic flow (the apparent motion of scene texture elements that occurs during self-motion) provides powerful signals about the direction of travel. Here, we test whether monocular blur impairs heading perception from optic flow compared to full vision under various levels of optic flow degradation. Participants (<i>N</i> = 52, mean age = 30 years) completed contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and heading perception tasks with rich or degraded optic flow, with or without monocular blur (0.4 logMAR Bangerter filter over the non-dominant eye, full vision in the dominant eye). Heading perception was assessed using a browser-based task where the participants viewed a 3-second video consistent with self-motion over a textured ground plane (moving towards the horizon at an offset heading ranging from -20 to +20°) and identified the point on the horizon towards which they were travelling. The measures of each participant's performance were the absolute and directional angular error between the heading offset and their response. Monocular blur and degraded flow were associated with an increase in absolute heading error and a larger underestimation of heading angle, with the worst performance observed when monocular blur and degraded flow were combined. These results suggest that the impact of monocular blur on heading perception becomes apparent only when optic flow signals are weak (e.g., night-time driving). These findings support the theory that monocular blur and the richness of visual information interact to produce deficits in heading perception.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"I-Perception\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"20416695251317148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863211/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"I-Perception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251317148\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I-Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695251317148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

单目模糊有时会影响运动;然而,这种情况何时发生并不总是很清楚。光流(在自运动过程中发生的场景纹理元素的表观运动)提供了关于行进方向的强大信号。在这里,我们测试了在不同程度的光流退化情况下,与全视觉相比,单眼模糊是否会损害光流对头部的感知。参与者(N = 52,平均年龄= 30岁)完成了对比敏感度、视力和头球感知任务,其中有丰富或退化的光流,有或没有单眼模糊(0.4 logMAR Bangerter滤过非主视眼,主视眼完全视力)。航向感知是通过基于浏览器的任务来评估的,在这个任务中,参与者观看了一段3秒的视频,该视频与有纹理的地平面上的自运动一致(以-20°到+20°的偏移方向向地平线移动),并确定了他们正在行进的地平线上的点。每个参与者的表现的措施是绝对和定向角误差之间的航向偏移和他们的反应。单目模糊和退化流与绝对航向误差的增加和航向角的较大低估有关,当单目模糊和退化流结合使用时,观察到的性能最差。这些结果表明,只有当光流信号较弱时(例如夜间驾驶),单目模糊对头球感知的影响才会变得明显。这些发现支持了单眼模糊和视觉信息丰富性相互作用产生头球感知缺陷的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Monocular blur impairs heading judgements from optic flow.

Monocular blur impairs heading judgements from optic flow.

Monocular blur impairs heading judgements from optic flow.

Monocular blur impairs heading judgements from optic flow.

Monocular blur sometimes impairs locomotion; however, it is not always clear when this will happen. Optic flow (the apparent motion of scene texture elements that occurs during self-motion) provides powerful signals about the direction of travel. Here, we test whether monocular blur impairs heading perception from optic flow compared to full vision under various levels of optic flow degradation. Participants (N = 52, mean age = 30 years) completed contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and heading perception tasks with rich or degraded optic flow, with or without monocular blur (0.4 logMAR Bangerter filter over the non-dominant eye, full vision in the dominant eye). Heading perception was assessed using a browser-based task where the participants viewed a 3-second video consistent with self-motion over a textured ground plane (moving towards the horizon at an offset heading ranging from -20 to +20°) and identified the point on the horizon towards which they were travelling. The measures of each participant's performance were the absolute and directional angular error between the heading offset and their response. Monocular blur and degraded flow were associated with an increase in absolute heading error and a larger underestimation of heading angle, with the worst performance observed when monocular blur and degraded flow were combined. These results suggest that the impact of monocular blur on heading perception becomes apparent only when optic flow signals are weak (e.g., night-time driving). These findings support the theory that monocular blur and the richness of visual information interact to produce deficits in heading perception.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
I-Perception
I-Perception PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信