当天和预约结肠镜检查结果在肠道清洁不足;一项随机对照试验。

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Uğur Özsoy, Murat Yıldırım, Emin Daldal, Bülent Koca, Ali İhsan Sağlam, Sinan Cem Gül, Namık Özkan, Salih Yılmaz, İsmail Okan
{"title":"当天和预约结肠镜检查结果在肠道清洁不足;一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Uğur Özsoy, Murat Yıldırım, Emin Daldal, Bülent Koca, Ali İhsan Sağlam, Sinan Cem Gül, Namık Özkan, Salih Yılmaz, İsmail Okan","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the results of repeat colonoscopies performed on the same day and by appointment in patients with inadequate bowel cleansing.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled study. Eighty patients with inadequate bowel cleansing detected in elective colonoscopies were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: Group I: Same day group and Group II: Appointment day group. Same day colonoscopy group was given day hospitalization, sennoside A+B calcium was given and colonoscopy procedure was repeated. Patients in Group II were rescheduled and standard colonoscopy preparation protocol was applied. Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) was used for bowel preparation quality. Cecal intubation time, cecal intubation rate, procedure time, BBPS score and polyp detection rate were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the same-day group, 52.5% of the patients were female while 45.9% were female in the appointment group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age or gender (p>0.05). The rate of cecum intubation was higher in the same-day group than it was in the appointment group (p=0.022). The total BBPS score was 7.9±1.79 in the same-day group and 6.89±2.23 in the appointment group, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.03). When the two groups were compared in terms of tolerability of the procedure, no difference was detected (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Same-day colonoscopy is an effective method and can be performed safely in patients with inadequate bowel cleansing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":"41 1","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The results of the same day and appointment colonoscopy in inadequate bowel cleansing; a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Uğur Özsoy, Murat Yıldırım, Emin Daldal, Bülent Koca, Ali İhsan Sağlam, Sinan Cem Gül, Namık Özkan, Salih Yılmaz, İsmail Okan\",\"doi\":\"10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the results of repeat colonoscopies performed on the same day and by appointment in patients with inadequate bowel cleansing.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled study. Eighty patients with inadequate bowel cleansing detected in elective colonoscopies were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: Group I: Same day group and Group II: Appointment day group. Same day colonoscopy group was given day hospitalization, sennoside A+B calcium was given and colonoscopy procedure was repeated. Patients in Group II were rescheduled and standard colonoscopy preparation protocol was applied. Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) was used for bowel preparation quality. Cecal intubation time, cecal intubation rate, procedure time, BBPS score and polyp detection rate were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the same-day group, 52.5% of the patients were female while 45.9% were female in the appointment group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age or gender (p>0.05). The rate of cecum intubation was higher in the same-day group than it was in the appointment group (p=0.022). The total BBPS score was 7.9±1.79 in the same-day group and 6.89±2.23 in the appointment group, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.03). When the two groups were compared in terms of tolerability of the procedure, no difference was detected (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Same-day colonoscopy is an effective method and can be performed safely in patients with inadequate bowel cleansing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"61-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878186/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2025.6541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较当天重复结肠镜检查和预约在肠清洁不足的患者的结果。材料与方法:本研究设计为前瞻性随机对照研究。80例在择期结肠镜检查中发现肠道清洁不足的患者被纳入研究。患者随机分为2组:组1:当日组,组2:预约日组。当日结肠镜组给予当日住院治疗,给予番泻皂苷A+B钙,重复结肠镜检查。第二组患者重新安排时间,采用标准结肠镜检查准备方案。采用波士顿肠准备量表(BBPS)评价肠准备质量。比较两组间盲肠插管时间、盲肠插管率、手术时间、BBPS评分及息肉检出率。结果:当日组女性占52.5%,预约组女性占45.9%。两组患者年龄、性别差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。当日组盲肠插管率高于预约组(p=0.022)。当日组BBPS总分为7.9±1.79,预约组BBPS总分为6.89±2.23,差异有统计学意义(p=0.03)。两组患者对手术的耐受性比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:当日结肠镜检查是一种有效的方法,可安全地用于肠清洁不足的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The results of the same day and appointment colonoscopy in inadequate bowel cleansing; a randomized controlled trial.

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the results of repeat colonoscopies performed on the same day and by appointment in patients with inadequate bowel cleansing.

Material and methods: The study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled study. Eighty patients with inadequate bowel cleansing detected in elective colonoscopies were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: Group I: Same day group and Group II: Appointment day group. Same day colonoscopy group was given day hospitalization, sennoside A+B calcium was given and colonoscopy procedure was repeated. Patients in Group II were rescheduled and standard colonoscopy preparation protocol was applied. Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) was used for bowel preparation quality. Cecal intubation time, cecal intubation rate, procedure time, BBPS score and polyp detection rate were compared between the groups.

Results: In the same-day group, 52.5% of the patients were female while 45.9% were female in the appointment group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age or gender (p>0.05). The rate of cecum intubation was higher in the same-day group than it was in the appointment group (p=0.022). The total BBPS score was 7.9±1.79 in the same-day group and 6.89±2.23 in the appointment group, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.03). When the two groups were compared in terms of tolerability of the procedure, no difference was detected (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Same-day colonoscopy is an effective method and can be performed safely in patients with inadequate bowel cleansing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信