在日本对慢性便秘患者进行的一项多中心上市后监测:最终分析报告。

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121251321659
Atsushi Nakajima, Minami Umeyama, Masaaki Higashikawa, Yusuke Shimada, Yuki Arai
{"title":"在日本对慢性便秘患者进行的一项多中心上市后监测:最终分析报告。","authors":"Atsushi Nakajima, Minami Umeyama, Masaaki Higashikawa, Yusuke Shimada, Yuki Arai","doi":"10.1177/20503121251321659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>An interim analysis of postmarketing surveillance reported the safety and efficacy of elobixibat, a laxative medication that inhibits the ileal bile acid transporter, at 4 weeks in approximately 1000 patients with chronic constipation in Japan. However, its long-term safety and efficacy in elderly patients remain unclear. This study aimed to conclude and report the final analysis of postmarketing surveillance, including 52-week safety and efficacy profiles in a clinical practice setting, using approximately 3000 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The overall survey period spanned from June 2018 to May 2022. Observation periods were set at 4 weeks (4-week treatment period) and 52 weeks (52-week treatment period). Adverse drug reactions and efficacy outcomes, including defecation frequency, Bristol Stool Form Scale scores, and patient satisfaction, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 4-week safety analysis set included 3638 patients with a mean age of 70.8 years, and 73.7% were aged ⩾65 years. Most patients (62.5%) were treated with elobixibat alone, while the rest received concomitant laxatives. In total, 231 patients (6.35%) experienced adverse drug reactions, with gastrointestinal disorders (6.02%) such as diarrhea (3.35%) and abdominal pain (2.06%), being the most common adverse drug reaction. The adverse drug reaction incidence in elderly patients aged ⩾65, ⩾75, and ⩾85 years was 5.49%, 4.85%, and 2.80%, respectively. In the 52-week treatment period, adverse drug reaction incidence was 5.40% (71/1315 patients), similar to that in the 4-week treatment period. Regarding efficacy, defecation frequency and Bristol Stool Form Scale scores significantly improved from week 2 onward, regardless of the age group and administration timing (before breakfast, lunch, or dinner). Most patients reported satisfaction from week 2 onward (6.0%, 66.9%, 78.6%, and 90.4% at baseline, weeks 2, 4, and 52, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed the long-term safety and efficacy of elobixibat in patients with chronic constipation, including many elderly ones, in routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"13 ","pages":"20503121251321659"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multicenter, postmarketing surveillance of elobixibat in patients with chronic constipation in Japan: A final analysis report.\",\"authors\":\"Atsushi Nakajima, Minami Umeyama, Masaaki Higashikawa, Yusuke Shimada, Yuki Arai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20503121251321659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>An interim analysis of postmarketing surveillance reported the safety and efficacy of elobixibat, a laxative medication that inhibits the ileal bile acid transporter, at 4 weeks in approximately 1000 patients with chronic constipation in Japan. However, its long-term safety and efficacy in elderly patients remain unclear. This study aimed to conclude and report the final analysis of postmarketing surveillance, including 52-week safety and efficacy profiles in a clinical practice setting, using approximately 3000 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The overall survey period spanned from June 2018 to May 2022. Observation periods were set at 4 weeks (4-week treatment period) and 52 weeks (52-week treatment period). Adverse drug reactions and efficacy outcomes, including defecation frequency, Bristol Stool Form Scale scores, and patient satisfaction, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 4-week safety analysis set included 3638 patients with a mean age of 70.8 years, and 73.7% were aged ⩾65 years. Most patients (62.5%) were treated with elobixibat alone, while the rest received concomitant laxatives. In total, 231 patients (6.35%) experienced adverse drug reactions, with gastrointestinal disorders (6.02%) such as diarrhea (3.35%) and abdominal pain (2.06%), being the most common adverse drug reaction. The adverse drug reaction incidence in elderly patients aged ⩾65, ⩾75, and ⩾85 years was 5.49%, 4.85%, and 2.80%, respectively. In the 52-week treatment period, adverse drug reaction incidence was 5.40% (71/1315 patients), similar to that in the 4-week treatment period. Regarding efficacy, defecation frequency and Bristol Stool Form Scale scores significantly improved from week 2 onward, regardless of the age group and administration timing (before breakfast, lunch, or dinner). Most patients reported satisfaction from week 2 onward (6.0%, 66.9%, 78.6%, and 90.4% at baseline, weeks 2, 4, and 52, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirmed the long-term safety and efficacy of elobixibat in patients with chronic constipation, including many elderly ones, in routine clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAGE Open Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"20503121251321659\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863239/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAGE Open Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121251321659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121251321659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:一项上市后监测的中期分析报告了elobixbat的安全性和有效性,elobixbat是一种抑制回肠胆汁酸转运体的泻药,在日本约1000名慢性便秘患者4周后使用。然而,其在老年患者中的长期安全性和有效性尚不清楚。该研究旨在总结和报告上市后监测的最终分析,包括在临床实践环境中使用约3000例患者的52周安全性和有效性概况。方法:整体调查时间为2018年6月至2022年5月。观察期分别为4周(治疗期4周)和52周(治疗期52周)。分析药物不良反应和疗效结果,包括排便次数、布里斯托大便量表评分和患者满意度。结果:4周的安全性分析集包括3638名患者,平均年龄为70.8岁,73.7%的患者年龄大于或等于65岁。大多数患者(62.5%)单独使用依洛比西他治疗,其余患者同时使用泻药。共有231例(6.35%)患者发生药物不良反应,其中腹泻(3.35%)、腹痛(2.06%)等胃肠道紊乱(6.02%)是最常见的药物不良反应。年龄大于或等于65岁、大于或等于75岁和大于或等于85岁的老年患者的药物不良反应发生率分别为5.49%、4.85%和2.80%。52周治疗期间,药物不良反应发生率为5.40%(71/1315例),与4周治疗期间相似。关于疗效,排便频率和布里斯托大便形式量表评分从第2周起显著改善,无论年龄组和给药时间(早餐,午餐或晚餐前)。大多数患者从第2周开始报告满意度(基线、第2周、第4周和第52周分别为6.0%、66.9%、78.6%和90.4%)。结论:本研究在常规临床实践中证实了依洛比昔巴特治疗慢性便秘患者,包括许多老年便秘患者的长期安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multicenter, postmarketing surveillance of elobixibat in patients with chronic constipation in Japan: A final analysis report.

Objective: An interim analysis of postmarketing surveillance reported the safety and efficacy of elobixibat, a laxative medication that inhibits the ileal bile acid transporter, at 4 weeks in approximately 1000 patients with chronic constipation in Japan. However, its long-term safety and efficacy in elderly patients remain unclear. This study aimed to conclude and report the final analysis of postmarketing surveillance, including 52-week safety and efficacy profiles in a clinical practice setting, using approximately 3000 patients.

Methods: The overall survey period spanned from June 2018 to May 2022. Observation periods were set at 4 weeks (4-week treatment period) and 52 weeks (52-week treatment period). Adverse drug reactions and efficacy outcomes, including defecation frequency, Bristol Stool Form Scale scores, and patient satisfaction, were analyzed.

Results: The 4-week safety analysis set included 3638 patients with a mean age of 70.8 years, and 73.7% were aged ⩾65 years. Most patients (62.5%) were treated with elobixibat alone, while the rest received concomitant laxatives. In total, 231 patients (6.35%) experienced adverse drug reactions, with gastrointestinal disorders (6.02%) such as diarrhea (3.35%) and abdominal pain (2.06%), being the most common adverse drug reaction. The adverse drug reaction incidence in elderly patients aged ⩾65, ⩾75, and ⩾85 years was 5.49%, 4.85%, and 2.80%, respectively. In the 52-week treatment period, adverse drug reaction incidence was 5.40% (71/1315 patients), similar to that in the 4-week treatment period. Regarding efficacy, defecation frequency and Bristol Stool Form Scale scores significantly improved from week 2 onward, regardless of the age group and administration timing (before breakfast, lunch, or dinner). Most patients reported satisfaction from week 2 onward (6.0%, 66.9%, 78.6%, and 90.4% at baseline, weeks 2, 4, and 52, respectively).

Conclusion: This study confirmed the long-term safety and efficacy of elobixibat in patients with chronic constipation, including many elderly ones, in routine clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信