1毫米计算机断层扫描和3毫米磁共振成像对直肠癌盆腔外侧淋巴结转移的诊断能力比较。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Surgery Today Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s00595-025-03018-w
Ryutaro Kobayashi, Kay Uehara, Tomoki Ebata, Hiroshi Yatsuya, Yuanying Li, Koya Hida, Yojiro Hashiguchi, Soichiro Ishihara, Shimpei Ogawa, Akio Shiomi, Kazushige Kawai, Yoichi Ajioka
{"title":"1毫米计算机断层扫描和3毫米磁共振成像对直肠癌盆腔外侧淋巴结转移的诊断能力比较。","authors":"Ryutaro Kobayashi, Kay Uehara, Tomoki Ebata, Hiroshi Yatsuya, Yuanying Li, Koya Hida, Yojiro Hashiguchi, Soichiro Ishihara, Shimpei Ogawa, Akio Shiomi, Kazushige Kawai, Yoichi Ajioka","doi":"10.1007/s00595-025-03018-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The best modality for evaluating lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastases from rectal cancer remains unclear. This study compared the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography (CT) and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying LPLN metastases based on size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study analyzed not individual patients but 191 sides from 100 rectal cancer patients without preoperative treatment for whom preoperative CT and MRI and corresponding pathological results for LPLNs were available. A swollen LPLN was defined as an LN with a short-axis size of ≥5 mm on 1-mm CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LPLNs were detected significantly more frequently with 1-mm CT than with 3-mm MRI (p < 0.001). Among the 117 sides without swollen LPLNs, metastasis was observed in 1.7% of patients. In contrast, LPLN metastasis was confirmed in 28.4% of 74 sides with swollen LPLNs. In the evaluation of swollen LPLNs, 3-mm MRI yielded a 34% improvement in the diagnostic performance of LPLN metastasis over 1-mm CT (categorical net reclassification improvement: 0.341, p = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, 1-mm CT should be performed preoperatively to evaluate LPLNs. Further evaluations can be omitted in the absence of swollen LPLNs. In patients with swollen LPLNs, a careful assessment of LPLN metastasis should be conducted via additional MRI, even in early T-stage tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":"1189-1197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lateral pelvic lymph node metastases from rectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Ryutaro Kobayashi, Kay Uehara, Tomoki Ebata, Hiroshi Yatsuya, Yuanying Li, Koya Hida, Yojiro Hashiguchi, Soichiro Ishihara, Shimpei Ogawa, Akio Shiomi, Kazushige Kawai, Yoichi Ajioka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00595-025-03018-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The best modality for evaluating lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastases from rectal cancer remains unclear. This study compared the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography (CT) and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying LPLN metastases based on size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study analyzed not individual patients but 191 sides from 100 rectal cancer patients without preoperative treatment for whom preoperative CT and MRI and corresponding pathological results for LPLNs were available. A swollen LPLN was defined as an LN with a short-axis size of ≥5 mm on 1-mm CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LPLNs were detected significantly more frequently with 1-mm CT than with 3-mm MRI (p < 0.001). Among the 117 sides without swollen LPLNs, metastasis was observed in 1.7% of patients. In contrast, LPLN metastasis was confirmed in 28.4% of 74 sides with swollen LPLNs. In the evaluation of swollen LPLNs, 3-mm MRI yielded a 34% improvement in the diagnostic performance of LPLN metastasis over 1-mm CT (categorical net reclassification improvement: 0.341, p = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, 1-mm CT should be performed preoperatively to evaluate LPLNs. Further evaluations can be omitted in the absence of swollen LPLNs. In patients with swollen LPLNs, a careful assessment of LPLN metastasis should be conducted via additional MRI, even in early T-stage tumors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery Today\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1189-1197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03018-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03018-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估直肠癌盆腔外侧淋巴结(LPLN)转移的最佳方式尚不清楚。本研究比较了1毫米计算机断层扫描(CT)和3毫米磁共振成像(MRI)基于大小识别LPLN转移的诊断能力。方法:本观察性研究分析了100例未经术前治疗的直肠癌患者的191侧,术前CT、MRI及相应的lpln病理结果。肿胀的LPLN被定义为1-mm CT上短轴尺寸≥5mm的LN。结果:1 mm CT对lpln的检出率明显高于3 mm MRI (p结论:术前应行1 mm CT检查评估lpln。如果没有肿胀的lpln,可以省略进一步的评估。对于LPLN肿胀的患者,应通过额外的MRI仔细评估LPLN转移,即使是早期t期肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging for detecting lateral pelvic lymph node metastases from rectal cancer.

Aim: The best modality for evaluating lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastases from rectal cancer remains unclear. This study compared the diagnostic ability of 1-mm computed tomography (CT) and 3-mm magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying LPLN metastases based on size.

Methods: This observational study analyzed not individual patients but 191 sides from 100 rectal cancer patients without preoperative treatment for whom preoperative CT and MRI and corresponding pathological results for LPLNs were available. A swollen LPLN was defined as an LN with a short-axis size of ≥5 mm on 1-mm CT.

Results: LPLNs were detected significantly more frequently with 1-mm CT than with 3-mm MRI (p < 0.001). Among the 117 sides without swollen LPLNs, metastasis was observed in 1.7% of patients. In contrast, LPLN metastasis was confirmed in 28.4% of 74 sides with swollen LPLNs. In the evaluation of swollen LPLNs, 3-mm MRI yielded a 34% improvement in the diagnostic performance of LPLN metastasis over 1-mm CT (categorical net reclassification improvement: 0.341, p = 0.045).

Conclusions: In conclusion, 1-mm CT should be performed preoperatively to evaluate LPLNs. Further evaluations can be omitted in the absence of swollen LPLNs. In patients with swollen LPLNs, a careful assessment of LPLN metastasis should be conducted via additional MRI, even in early T-stage tumors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信