美国先天性心导管插入术中耗氧量值的显著实践差异:横断面调查。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Daisuke Kobayashi, Dominic B Zanaboni, Andrew C Glatz, David Balzer
{"title":"美国先天性心导管插入术中耗氧量值的显著实践差异:横断面调查。","authors":"Daisuke Kobayashi, Dominic B Zanaboni, Andrew C Glatz, David Balzer","doi":"10.1007/s00246-025-03817-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>) is an essential component to calculate cardiac output using the Fick principle in the congenital cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCCL). Although VO<sub>2</sub> can be measured, the value of VO<sub>2</sub> is frequently assumed based on predictive equations. The objective of this study was to investigate current practice variation in measurement and estimation of VO<sub>2</sub> in CCCL. This was a cross-sectional survey study conducted in January-February 2024. The survey (n = 114) was sent to one interventional cardiologist for each CCCL program in the United States utilizing REDCap. The responses were summarized in a descriptive fashion. Eighty eight programs completed the survey (response rate 77%). Only 13 (15%) programs measured VO<sub>2</sub>, though 67 programs (76%) thought VO<sub>2</sub> should be measured for all cases (n = 41) and selective cases (n = 26) and 17 programs thought assumed VO<sub>2</sub> was satisfactory. When VO<sub>2</sub> is referred from predictive equations, most programs primarily used LaFarge (n = 64, 73%), followed by Seckeler (n = 23, 26%). For patients aged < 3 years (where LaFarge equation does not provide VO2 value) in 64 programs using LaFarge, 16 used Seckeler and the remaining 48 programs used a wide range of arbitrary VO<sub>2</sub> values. Most CCCL thought VO<sub>2</sub> should be measured but only 13 (15%) programs actually measured VO<sub>2</sub> in the United States. LaFarge remains frequently used as a predictive equation. There is no standardization of clinical practice in VO<sub>2</sub> measurement/estimation among CCCL in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significant Practice Variation in Oxygen Consumption Values in Congenital Cardiac Catheterization: Cross Sectional Survey in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Kobayashi, Dominic B Zanaboni, Andrew C Glatz, David Balzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00246-025-03817-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Oxygen consumption (VO<sub>2</sub>) is an essential component to calculate cardiac output using the Fick principle in the congenital cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCCL). Although VO<sub>2</sub> can be measured, the value of VO<sub>2</sub> is frequently assumed based on predictive equations. The objective of this study was to investigate current practice variation in measurement and estimation of VO<sub>2</sub> in CCCL. This was a cross-sectional survey study conducted in January-February 2024. The survey (n = 114) was sent to one interventional cardiologist for each CCCL program in the United States utilizing REDCap. The responses were summarized in a descriptive fashion. Eighty eight programs completed the survey (response rate 77%). Only 13 (15%) programs measured VO<sub>2</sub>, though 67 programs (76%) thought VO<sub>2</sub> should be measured for all cases (n = 41) and selective cases (n = 26) and 17 programs thought assumed VO<sub>2</sub> was satisfactory. When VO<sub>2</sub> is referred from predictive equations, most programs primarily used LaFarge (n = 64, 73%), followed by Seckeler (n = 23, 26%). For patients aged < 3 years (where LaFarge equation does not provide VO2 value) in 64 programs using LaFarge, 16 used Seckeler and the remaining 48 programs used a wide range of arbitrary VO<sub>2</sub> values. Most CCCL thought VO<sub>2</sub> should be measured but only 13 (15%) programs actually measured VO<sub>2</sub> in the United States. LaFarge remains frequently used as a predictive equation. There is no standardization of clinical practice in VO<sub>2</sub> measurement/estimation among CCCL in the United States.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-025-03817-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-025-03817-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在先天性心导管实验室(CCCL),耗氧量(VO2)是使用菲克原理计算心输出量的重要组成部分。虽然可以测量VO2,但VO2的值通常是基于预测方程来假设的。本研究的目的是调查目前CCCL中测量和估计VO2的实践差异。这是一项横断面调查研究,于2024年1月至2月进行。该调查(n = 114)通过REDCap发送给美国每个CCCL项目的一位介入心脏病专家。这些回答以描述性的方式进行了总结。88个项目完成了调查(回复率77%)。只有13个(15%)程序测量了VO2,尽管67个(76%)程序认为VO2应该对所有病例(n = 41)和选择性病例(n = 26)进行测量,17个程序认为VO2是令人满意的。当从预测方程中引用VO2时,大多数程序主要使用LaFarge (n = 64,73%),其次是Seckeler (n = 23,26%)。对于2岁的患者值。大多数CCCL认为应该测量VO2,但在美国只有13个(15%)项目实际测量了VO2。LaFarge仍然经常被用作预测方程。在美国CCCL中没有VO2测量/估计的临床实践标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Significant Practice Variation in Oxygen Consumption Values in Congenital Cardiac Catheterization: Cross Sectional Survey in the United States.

Oxygen consumption (VO2) is an essential component to calculate cardiac output using the Fick principle in the congenital cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCCL). Although VO2 can be measured, the value of VO2 is frequently assumed based on predictive equations. The objective of this study was to investigate current practice variation in measurement and estimation of VO2 in CCCL. This was a cross-sectional survey study conducted in January-February 2024. The survey (n = 114) was sent to one interventional cardiologist for each CCCL program in the United States utilizing REDCap. The responses were summarized in a descriptive fashion. Eighty eight programs completed the survey (response rate 77%). Only 13 (15%) programs measured VO2, though 67 programs (76%) thought VO2 should be measured for all cases (n = 41) and selective cases (n = 26) and 17 programs thought assumed VO2 was satisfactory. When VO2 is referred from predictive equations, most programs primarily used LaFarge (n = 64, 73%), followed by Seckeler (n = 23, 26%). For patients aged < 3 years (where LaFarge equation does not provide VO2 value) in 64 programs using LaFarge, 16 used Seckeler and the remaining 48 programs used a wide range of arbitrary VO2 values. Most CCCL thought VO2 should be measured but only 13 (15%) programs actually measured VO2 in the United States. LaFarge remains frequently used as a predictive equation. There is no standardization of clinical practice in VO2 measurement/estimation among CCCL in the United States.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Cardiology
Pediatric Cardiology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
258
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信