IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1490134
Mark B Luke, Moses Ziah, Lily Zhi Ning Lu, Michael D Davis, Samson Arzoaquoi, Eva Drucker, Foday Kanneh, Gorbee G Logan, Moses Massaquoi
{"title":"Effectiveness of a short-term oxygen therapy training program in Liberia during and after COVID-19.","authors":"Mark B Luke, Moses Ziah, Lily Zhi Ning Lu, Michael D Davis, Samson Arzoaquoi, Eva Drucker, Foday Kanneh, Gorbee G Logan, Moses Massaquoi","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1490134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to high-quality medical oxygen has been a long-standing challenge in Liberia due to barriers that span across the health system, which were amplified during the COVID-19 pandemic. The surge in cases requiring oxygen therapy necessitated rapid capacity-building for healthcare workers. In response, an emergency oxygen training package was adapted and implemented by the Liberia Ministry of Health and the National Incidence Management System. This manuscript evaluates the implementation of a short-term respiratory care training package to rapidly build healthcare worker capacity during the COVID-19 response and its adaptation for routine in-service training post-response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The emergency training used the \"hot and cold\" simulation approach from the 2014 Ebola response, consisting of a cold phase (3-days) with didactic lectures and practical sessions, and mock COVID treatment unit simulations (2-days); and a hot phase within an active CTU. Participants were doctors, physician assistants, nurses, or midwives, deployed to COVID treatment units at major health centers and hospitals across all counties in Liberia. Training assessments consisted of a paper-based knowledge test pre- and post-training, and Objective Structured Clinical Examinations post-training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The emergency training as part of COVID response included 123 health care workers from 43 health facilities and saw a significant increase in knowledge (median score of 46% pre-training vs. 84% post-training, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Adaptation and piloting of the package for routine in-service training was also effective at increasing knowledge amongst 81 health care workers (median score of 41% pre-training vs. 78% post-training, <i>p</i> < 0.001). High post-training Objective Structured Clinical Examination scores demonstrated clinical competency achievement in both cohorts. For emergency training, median scores were 92% (pulse oximetry), 81% (oxygen cylinders), and 83% (oxygen concentrators). For routine in-service training, scores were 88, 82, and 84%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrate that the implementation of a healthcare worker training package in oxygen therapy during the COVID response in Liberia and its eventual integration into a routine in-service training program was able to achieve significant improvements in health care worker knowledge and skills. This highlights the feasibility of using rapid and short-term training to enhance clinical capacity within both emergency and post-response settings in a resource-limited country.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1490134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863143/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1490134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在利比里亚,获得高质量医用氧气一直是一项长期挑战,原因是整个医疗系统都存在障碍,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,这些障碍更加严重。由于需要氧气治疗的病例激增,医护人员必须迅速开展能力建设。为此,利比里亚卫生部和国家发病率管理系统调整并实施了一套紧急氧气培训教材。本手稿评估了在 COVID-19 应对行动期间为快速提高医护人员能力而实施的短期呼吸护理培训教材,以及在应对行动后将其调整为常规在职培训教材的情况:方法: 应急培训采用了 2014 年埃博拉应对行动中的 "冷热 "模拟方法,包括冷阶段(3 天)的说教讲座和实践课程,以及模拟 COVID 治疗单元(2 天);以及活动 CTU 中的热阶段。参加者是医生、医生助理、护士或助产士,被派往利比里亚各州主要保健中心和医院的 COVID 治疗单位。培训评估包括培训前后的纸质知识测试和培训后的客观结构化临床考试:结果:作为 COVID 应对措施的一部分,来自 43 家医疗机构的 123 名医护人员参加了应急培训,知识水平显著提高(培训前与培训后的得分中位数分别为 46%和 84%,p p 结论:我们证明,在利比里亚应对 COVID 期间实施医护人员氧气疗法培训包,并最终将其纳入常规在职培训计划,能够显著提高医护人员的知识和技能。这突出表明,在资源有限的国家,利用快速短期培训来提高应急和应急后环境中的临床能力是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of a short-term oxygen therapy training program in Liberia during and after COVID-19.

Background: Access to high-quality medical oxygen has been a long-standing challenge in Liberia due to barriers that span across the health system, which were amplified during the COVID-19 pandemic. The surge in cases requiring oxygen therapy necessitated rapid capacity-building for healthcare workers. In response, an emergency oxygen training package was adapted and implemented by the Liberia Ministry of Health and the National Incidence Management System. This manuscript evaluates the implementation of a short-term respiratory care training package to rapidly build healthcare worker capacity during the COVID-19 response and its adaptation for routine in-service training post-response.

Methods: The emergency training used the "hot and cold" simulation approach from the 2014 Ebola response, consisting of a cold phase (3-days) with didactic lectures and practical sessions, and mock COVID treatment unit simulations (2-days); and a hot phase within an active CTU. Participants were doctors, physician assistants, nurses, or midwives, deployed to COVID treatment units at major health centers and hospitals across all counties in Liberia. Training assessments consisted of a paper-based knowledge test pre- and post-training, and Objective Structured Clinical Examinations post-training.

Results: The emergency training as part of COVID response included 123 health care workers from 43 health facilities and saw a significant increase in knowledge (median score of 46% pre-training vs. 84% post-training, p < 0.001). Adaptation and piloting of the package for routine in-service training was also effective at increasing knowledge amongst 81 health care workers (median score of 41% pre-training vs. 78% post-training, p < 0.001). High post-training Objective Structured Clinical Examination scores demonstrated clinical competency achievement in both cohorts. For emergency training, median scores were 92% (pulse oximetry), 81% (oxygen cylinders), and 83% (oxygen concentrators). For routine in-service training, scores were 88, 82, and 84%, respectively.

Conclusion: We demonstrate that the implementation of a healthcare worker training package in oxygen therapy during the COVID response in Liberia and its eventual integration into a routine in-service training program was able to achieve significant improvements in health care worker knowledge and skills. This highlights the feasibility of using rapid and short-term training to enhance clinical capacity within both emergency and post-response settings in a resource-limited country.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信