为照顾住在长期护理机构的60岁或以上老人的保健工作者接种流感疫苗。

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Roger E Thomas, Tom Jefferson, Toby J Lasserson, Stan Earnshaw
{"title":"为照顾住在长期护理机构的60岁或以上老人的保健工作者接种流感疫苗。","authors":"Roger E Thomas, Tom Jefferson, Toby J Lasserson, Stan Earnshaw","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>People who work in long-term care institutions (LTCIs), such as doctors, nurses, other health professionals, cleaners and porters (and also family visitors), may have substantial rates of influenza during influenza seasons. They often continue to work when infected with influenza, increasing the likelihood of transmitting influenza to those in their care. The immune systems of care home residents may be weaker than those of the general population; vaccinating care home workers could reduce transmission of influenza within LTCIs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effects of vaccinating healthcare workers in long-term care institutions against influenza on influenza-related outcomes in residents aged 60 years or older.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase (via Elsevier), Web of Science (Science Citation Index-Expanded and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science), and two clinical trials registries up to 22 August 2024.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>In this version of the review we restricted eligibility to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of influenza vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) caring for residents aged 60 years or older in LTCIs. Previously we included cohort or case-control studies.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Outcomes of interest were: influenza (confirmed by laboratory tests) and its complications (lower respiratory tract infection; hospitalisation or death due to lower respiratory tract infection), all-cause mortality, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Risk of bias: </strong>We used version one of the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs.</p><p><strong>Synthesis methods: </strong>Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We used risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to summarise the effects of vaccination on our outcomes of interest. We accounted for clustering by dividing events and sample sizes for each study by an assumed design effect as part of a sensitivity analysis. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for our outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Included studies: </strong>We did not identify any new trials for inclusion in this update. Four cluster-RCTs from Europe (8468 residents) of interventions to offer influenza vaccination for HCWs caring for residents ≥ 60 years in LTCIs provided outcome data that addressed the objectives of our review. The average age of the residents was between 77 and 86 years, and most were female (70% to 77%). The studies were comparable in their intervention and outcome measures. The studies did not report adverse events. The principal sources of bias in the studies related to attrition, lack of blinding, contamination in the control groups, and low rates of vaccination coverage in the intervention arms, leading us to downgrade the certainty of evidence for all outcomes due to serious risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>Offering influenza vaccination to HCWs based in LTCIs may have little or no effect on the number of residents who develop influenza compared with those living in care homes where no vaccination is offered (from 5% to 4%) (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.63; 2 studies, 752 participants; low-certainty evidence). We rated the evidence to be low from one study of 1059 residents showing a slight reduction in lower respiratory tract infection from HCW vaccination (6% versus 4%) (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.2). The confidence interval is compatible with both a meaningful reduction and a slight increase in infections when illustrated as an absolute effect; 2% to 7%. Taking account of clustering for this outcome increased the confidence interval further, and we rated the evidence as very low-certainty accordingly (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.85). HCW vaccination programmes may have little or no effect on the number of residents admitted to hospital for respiratory illness (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.27; 1 study, 3400 participants; low-certainty evidence). There is insufficient evidence to determine whether HCW vaccination impacts on death due to lower respiratory tract infections in residents: 2% of residents in both groups died from lower respiratory tract infections based on the RR of 0.82 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.49; 2 studies, 4459 participants; very low-certainty evidence). HCW vaccination probably leads to a reduction in all-cause deaths from 9% to 6% (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.80; 4 studies, 8468 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>The effects of HCW vaccination on influenza-specific outcomes in older residents of LTCIs are uncertain. The reduction in all-cause mortality in people observed could not be explained by changes in influenza-specific outcomes. This review did not find information on co-interventions with HCW vaccination: hand washing, face masks, early detection of laboratory-proven influenza, quarantine, avoiding admissions, antivirals and asking HCWs with influenza or influenza-like illness not to go to work. Better studies are needed to give greater certainty in the evidence for vaccinating HCWs to prevent influenza in residents aged 60 years or older in LTCIs. Additional studies are needed to further test these interventions in combination.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This review update received no dedicated funding. Previous versions of this review were supported by grants from the National Institute of Health Research (UK), and the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia).</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Protocol (2005): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub Original review (2006): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub2 Update (2010): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub3 Update (2013): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub4 Update (2016): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub5.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"2 ","pages":"CD005187"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who care for people aged 60 or older living in long-term care institutions.\",\"authors\":\"Roger E Thomas, Tom Jefferson, Toby J Lasserson, Stan Earnshaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>People who work in long-term care institutions (LTCIs), such as doctors, nurses, other health professionals, cleaners and porters (and also family visitors), may have substantial rates of influenza during influenza seasons. They often continue to work when infected with influenza, increasing the likelihood of transmitting influenza to those in their care. The immune systems of care home residents may be weaker than those of the general population; vaccinating care home workers could reduce transmission of influenza within LTCIs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effects of vaccinating healthcare workers in long-term care institutions against influenza on influenza-related outcomes in residents aged 60 years or older.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase (via Elsevier), Web of Science (Science Citation Index-Expanded and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science), and two clinical trials registries up to 22 August 2024.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>In this version of the review we restricted eligibility to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of influenza vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) caring for residents aged 60 years or older in LTCIs. Previously we included cohort or case-control studies.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Outcomes of interest were: influenza (confirmed by laboratory tests) and its complications (lower respiratory tract infection; hospitalisation or death due to lower respiratory tract infection), all-cause mortality, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Risk of bias: </strong>We used version one of the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs.</p><p><strong>Synthesis methods: </strong>Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We used risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to summarise the effects of vaccination on our outcomes of interest. We accounted for clustering by dividing events and sample sizes for each study by an assumed design effect as part of a sensitivity analysis. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for our outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Included studies: </strong>We did not identify any new trials for inclusion in this update. Four cluster-RCTs from Europe (8468 residents) of interventions to offer influenza vaccination for HCWs caring for residents ≥ 60 years in LTCIs provided outcome data that addressed the objectives of our review. The average age of the residents was between 77 and 86 years, and most were female (70% to 77%). The studies were comparable in their intervention and outcome measures. The studies did not report adverse events. The principal sources of bias in the studies related to attrition, lack of blinding, contamination in the control groups, and low rates of vaccination coverage in the intervention arms, leading us to downgrade the certainty of evidence for all outcomes due to serious risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>Offering influenza vaccination to HCWs based in LTCIs may have little or no effect on the number of residents who develop influenza compared with those living in care homes where no vaccination is offered (from 5% to 4%) (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.63; 2 studies, 752 participants; low-certainty evidence). We rated the evidence to be low from one study of 1059 residents showing a slight reduction in lower respiratory tract infection from HCW vaccination (6% versus 4%) (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.2). The confidence interval is compatible with both a meaningful reduction and a slight increase in infections when illustrated as an absolute effect; 2% to 7%. Taking account of clustering for this outcome increased the confidence interval further, and we rated the evidence as very low-certainty accordingly (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.85). HCW vaccination programmes may have little or no effect on the number of residents admitted to hospital for respiratory illness (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.27; 1 study, 3400 participants; low-certainty evidence). There is insufficient evidence to determine whether HCW vaccination impacts on death due to lower respiratory tract infections in residents: 2% of residents in both groups died from lower respiratory tract infections based on the RR of 0.82 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.49; 2 studies, 4459 participants; very low-certainty evidence). HCW vaccination probably leads to a reduction in all-cause deaths from 9% to 6% (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.80; 4 studies, 8468 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>The effects of HCW vaccination on influenza-specific outcomes in older residents of LTCIs are uncertain. The reduction in all-cause mortality in people observed could not be explained by changes in influenza-specific outcomes. This review did not find information on co-interventions with HCW vaccination: hand washing, face masks, early detection of laboratory-proven influenza, quarantine, avoiding admissions, antivirals and asking HCWs with influenza or influenza-like illness not to go to work. Better studies are needed to give greater certainty in the evidence for vaccinating HCWs to prevent influenza in residents aged 60 years or older in LTCIs. Additional studies are needed to further test these interventions in combination.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This review update received no dedicated funding. Previous versions of this review were supported by grants from the National Institute of Health Research (UK), and the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia).</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Protocol (2005): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub Original review (2006): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub2 Update (2010): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub3 Update (2013): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub4 Update (2016): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub5.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"CD005187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11866472/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:在长期护理机构(ltci)工作的人员,如医生、护士、其他卫生专业人员、清洁工和搬运工(以及家庭访客),在流感季节可能有很高的流感发病率。他们在感染流感后往往继续工作,增加了将流感传播给他们所照顾的人的可能性。护理院居民的免疫系统可能比一般人弱;为护理院工作人员接种疫苗可减少流感在ltci内的传播。目的:评估长期护理机构的卫生保健工作者接种流感疫苗对60岁或以上居民流感相关结局的影响。检索方法:我们检索了Cochrane中央对照试验注册库(通过Cochrane图书馆),MEDLINE(通过Ovid), Embase(通过Elsevier), Web of Science(科学引文索引扩展和会议记录引文索引-科学)和两个临床试验注册库,截止到2024年8月22日。资格标准:在本版本的综述中,我们将资格限制在ltci中照顾60岁或以上居民的卫生保健工作者(HCWs)的流感疫苗接种的随机对照试验(rct)。以前我们纳入了队列研究或病例对照研究。结局:关注的结局是:流感(经实验室检查证实)及其并发症(下呼吸道感染;住院或因下呼吸道感染而死亡)、全因死亡率和不良事件。偏倚风险:我们使用Cochrane rct偏倚风险工具的第一个版本。综合方法:两位综述作者独立提取数据并评估偏倚风险。我们使用95%置信区间(ci)的风险比(rr)来总结疫苗接种对我们感兴趣的结果的影响。作为敏感性分析的一部分,我们通过假设设计效应将每个研究的事件和样本量分开来解释聚类。我们使用GRADE来评估我们感兴趣的结果证据的确定性。纳入的研究:我们没有发现任何新的试验纳入本次更新。来自欧洲的4个集群随机对照试验(8468名居民)为照顾ltci≥60岁居民的医护人员提供流感疫苗接种的干预措施,提供了符合我们综述目标的结果数据。居民平均年龄为77 ~ 86岁,以女性居多(70% ~ 77%)。这些研究在干预措施和结果测量方面具有可比性。这些研究没有报告不良事件。研究中的主要偏倚来源与损耗、缺乏盲法、对照组的污染以及干预组的低疫苗接种率有关,由于严重的偏倚风险,导致我们降低了所有结果证据的确定性。综合结果:与没有接种疫苗的养老院居民相比,向ltci的卫生保健员提供流感疫苗可能对患流感的居民人数影响很小或没有影响(5%至4%)(RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.46至1.63;2项研究,752名受试者;确定性的证据)。我们对一项涉及1059名居民的研究的证据进行了低评级,该研究显示接种HCW疫苗后下呼吸道感染略有减少(6%对4%)(RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.41至1.2)。当以绝对效果说明时,置信区间与感染有意义的减少和轻微的增加是相容的;2%到7%。考虑到该结果的聚类进一步增加了置信区间,因此我们将证据评为非常低确定性(RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.28至1.85)。HCW疫苗接种规划可能对因呼吸道疾病住院的居民人数影响很小或没有影响(RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.82至1.27;1项研究,3400名参与者;确定性的证据)。没有足够的证据来确定HCW疫苗接种是否会影响居民因下呼吸道感染而死亡:两组中2%的居民死于下呼吸道感染,RR为0.82 (95% CI 0.45至1.49;2项研究,4459名受试者;非常低确定性证据)。接种HCW疫苗可能导致全因死亡率从9%降至6% (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60至0.80;4项研究,8468名受试者;moderate-certainty证据)。作者的结论:HCW疫苗接种对ltci老年居民流感特异性结局的影响是不确定的。观察到的人群全因死亡率的降低不能用流感特异性结局的变化来解释。本综述未发现与HCW疫苗接种联合干预措施的信息:洗手、口罩、实验室证实的流感的早期发现、隔离、避免入院、抗病毒药物以及要求患有流感或流感样疾病的卫生保健工作者不要去上班。 需要进行更好的研究,以提供更确定的证据,证明为卫生保健员接种疫苗以预防ltci 60岁或以上居民的流感。需要进一步的研究来进一步测试这些干预措施的组合。经费:本次评审更新没有收到专门的经费。本综述的先前版本得到了英国国家卫生研究所和澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会的资助。注册:协议(2005):10.1002/14651858.CD005187。pub原评(2006):10.002 /14651858. cd005187。pub2 Update (2010): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187。pub3 Update (2013): 10.002 /14651858. cd005187。pub4 Update (2016): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who care for people aged 60 or older living in long-term care institutions.

Rationale: People who work in long-term care institutions (LTCIs), such as doctors, nurses, other health professionals, cleaners and porters (and also family visitors), may have substantial rates of influenza during influenza seasons. They often continue to work when infected with influenza, increasing the likelihood of transmitting influenza to those in their care. The immune systems of care home residents may be weaker than those of the general population; vaccinating care home workers could reduce transmission of influenza within LTCIs.

Objectives: To assess the effects of vaccinating healthcare workers in long-term care institutions against influenza on influenza-related outcomes in residents aged 60 years or older.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (via Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase (via Elsevier), Web of Science (Science Citation Index-Expanded and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science), and two clinical trials registries up to 22 August 2024.

Eligibility criteria: In this version of the review we restricted eligibility to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of influenza vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) caring for residents aged 60 years or older in LTCIs. Previously we included cohort or case-control studies.

Outcomes: Outcomes of interest were: influenza (confirmed by laboratory tests) and its complications (lower respiratory tract infection; hospitalisation or death due to lower respiratory tract infection), all-cause mortality, and adverse events.

Risk of bias: We used version one of the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs.

Synthesis methods: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We used risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to summarise the effects of vaccination on our outcomes of interest. We accounted for clustering by dividing events and sample sizes for each study by an assumed design effect as part of a sensitivity analysis. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for our outcomes of interest.

Included studies: We did not identify any new trials for inclusion in this update. Four cluster-RCTs from Europe (8468 residents) of interventions to offer influenza vaccination for HCWs caring for residents ≥ 60 years in LTCIs provided outcome data that addressed the objectives of our review. The average age of the residents was between 77 and 86 years, and most were female (70% to 77%). The studies were comparable in their intervention and outcome measures. The studies did not report adverse events. The principal sources of bias in the studies related to attrition, lack of blinding, contamination in the control groups, and low rates of vaccination coverage in the intervention arms, leading us to downgrade the certainty of evidence for all outcomes due to serious risk of bias.

Synthesis of results: Offering influenza vaccination to HCWs based in LTCIs may have little or no effect on the number of residents who develop influenza compared with those living in care homes where no vaccination is offered (from 5% to 4%) (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.63; 2 studies, 752 participants; low-certainty evidence). We rated the evidence to be low from one study of 1059 residents showing a slight reduction in lower respiratory tract infection from HCW vaccination (6% versus 4%) (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.2). The confidence interval is compatible with both a meaningful reduction and a slight increase in infections when illustrated as an absolute effect; 2% to 7%. Taking account of clustering for this outcome increased the confidence interval further, and we rated the evidence as very low-certainty accordingly (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.85). HCW vaccination programmes may have little or no effect on the number of residents admitted to hospital for respiratory illness (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.27; 1 study, 3400 participants; low-certainty evidence). There is insufficient evidence to determine whether HCW vaccination impacts on death due to lower respiratory tract infections in residents: 2% of residents in both groups died from lower respiratory tract infections based on the RR of 0.82 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.49; 2 studies, 4459 participants; very low-certainty evidence). HCW vaccination probably leads to a reduction in all-cause deaths from 9% to 6% (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.80; 4 studies, 8468 participants; moderate-certainty evidence).

Authors' conclusions: The effects of HCW vaccination on influenza-specific outcomes in older residents of LTCIs are uncertain. The reduction in all-cause mortality in people observed could not be explained by changes in influenza-specific outcomes. This review did not find information on co-interventions with HCW vaccination: hand washing, face masks, early detection of laboratory-proven influenza, quarantine, avoiding admissions, antivirals and asking HCWs with influenza or influenza-like illness not to go to work. Better studies are needed to give greater certainty in the evidence for vaccinating HCWs to prevent influenza in residents aged 60 years or older in LTCIs. Additional studies are needed to further test these interventions in combination.

Funding: This review update received no dedicated funding. Previous versions of this review were supported by grants from the National Institute of Health Research (UK), and the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia).

Registration: Protocol (2005): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub Original review (2006): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub2 Update (2010): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub3 Update (2013): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub4 Update (2016): 10.1002/14651858.CD005187.pub5.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信