Fan Fan, Song Bai, Xiaofeng Li, Zhiqiang Li, Feng Tong, Jian Guo, Nan Ding, Zhangke Guo
{"title":"部分肺静脉连接异常手术矫正的不同入路比较。","authors":"Fan Fan, Song Bai, Xiaofeng Li, Zhiqiang Li, Feng Tong, Jian Guo, Nan Ding, Zhangke Guo","doi":"10.1017/S1047951125000617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Right anterolateral thoracotomy or left anterolateral thoracotomy applied to partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection correction have been reported to obtain cosmetic and less invasive outcomes as alternative approaches to median sternotomy. However, the application of different approaches is still confusing. We compared the perioperative and mid-term outcomes to seek indications of different approaches and guide surgical treatment of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2019 to August 2023, 44 patients who underwent surgical correction of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection were recruited. Of these, 13 (29.6%) patients who underwent median sternotomy were separated into M group, 28 (63.6%) patients who underwent right anterolateral thoracotomy were separated into R group, and three (6.8%) patients who underwent left anterolateral thoracotomy were separated into L group. Clinical data were reviewed and compared between each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In M group, direct anastomosis accounted for the most (7, 53.8%), in R group, intra-atrial rerouting accounted for the most (22, 78.6%), and in L group, direct anastomosis accounted for the most (3, 100%). R group had shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (70.0 ± 32.4 vs113.1 ± 83.3, <i>p</i> = 0.029), shorter ICU stay (1.0 ± 0.2 vs 1.9 ± 1.7, <i>p</i> = 0.01), shorter postoperative stay (6.0 ± 1.2 vs 8.3 ± 5.0, <i>p</i> = 0.021), and fewer chest tube drainage (8.4 ± 4.3 vs 13.9 ± 10.2, <i>p</i> = 0.026) compared with M group. Three left-sided partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection in L group adopted off-pump approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Median sternotomy S.V.C. can be applicable to all anatomic types of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection especially for complex types. Considering the minimally invasive advantages, we prefer applying right anterolateral thoracotomy for pulmonary vein connected to right atrium or proximal end of off-pump. Applying left anterolateral thoracotomy for left-sided partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection without atrial septal defect by off-pump.</p>","PeriodicalId":9435,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in the Young","volume":" ","pages":"776-783"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different approaches applied for surgical correction of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection.\",\"authors\":\"Fan Fan, Song Bai, Xiaofeng Li, Zhiqiang Li, Feng Tong, Jian Guo, Nan Ding, Zhangke Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1047951125000617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Right anterolateral thoracotomy or left anterolateral thoracotomy applied to partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection correction have been reported to obtain cosmetic and less invasive outcomes as alternative approaches to median sternotomy. However, the application of different approaches is still confusing. We compared the perioperative and mid-term outcomes to seek indications of different approaches and guide surgical treatment of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July 2019 to August 2023, 44 patients who underwent surgical correction of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection were recruited. Of these, 13 (29.6%) patients who underwent median sternotomy were separated into M group, 28 (63.6%) patients who underwent right anterolateral thoracotomy were separated into R group, and three (6.8%) patients who underwent left anterolateral thoracotomy were separated into L group. Clinical data were reviewed and compared between each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In M group, direct anastomosis accounted for the most (7, 53.8%), in R group, intra-atrial rerouting accounted for the most (22, 78.6%), and in L group, direct anastomosis accounted for the most (3, 100%). R group had shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (70.0 ± 32.4 vs113.1 ± 83.3, <i>p</i> = 0.029), shorter ICU stay (1.0 ± 0.2 vs 1.9 ± 1.7, <i>p</i> = 0.01), shorter postoperative stay (6.0 ± 1.2 vs 8.3 ± 5.0, <i>p</i> = 0.021), and fewer chest tube drainage (8.4 ± 4.3 vs 13.9 ± 10.2, <i>p</i> = 0.026) compared with M group. Three left-sided partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection in L group adopted off-pump approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Median sternotomy S.V.C. can be applicable to all anatomic types of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection especially for complex types. Considering the minimally invasive advantages, we prefer applying right anterolateral thoracotomy for pulmonary vein connected to right atrium or proximal end of off-pump. Applying left anterolateral thoracotomy for left-sided partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection without atrial septal defect by off-pump.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology in the Young\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"776-783\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology in the Young\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951125000617\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in the Young","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951125000617","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:据报道,右前外侧开胸术或左前外侧开胸术用于部分异常肺静脉连接矫正,作为胸骨正中切开术的替代方法,可获得美观和微创的结果。然而,不同方法的应用仍然令人困惑。我们比较围手术期和中期的预后,以寻求不同入路的适应证,指导部分肺静脉连接异常的手术治疗。方法:选取2019年7月至2023年8月行部分肺静脉连接异常手术矫治的患者44例。其中,13例胸骨正中切开患者(29.6%)分为M组,28例右前外侧开胸患者(63.6%)分为R组,3例左前外侧开胸患者(6.8%)分为L组。回顾两组临床资料并进行比较。结果:M组直接吻合最多(7例,53.8%),R组房内转路最多(22例,78.6%),L组直接吻合最多(3例,100%)。R组体外循环时间(70.0±32.4 vs113.1±83.3,p = 0.029)、ICU住院时间(1.0±0.2 vs 1.9±1.7,p = 0.01)、术后住院时间(6.0±1.2 vs 8.3±5.0,p = 0.021)、胸管引流时间(8.4±4.3 vs 13.9±10.2,p = 0.026)均较M组缩短。L组3例左侧部分肺静脉异常连接采用非泵入路。结论:胸骨正中切开术适用于所有解剖类型的部分肺静脉连接异常,尤其适用于复杂类型。考虑到微创优势,对于连接右心房的肺静脉或离泵近端,我们倾向于采用右前外侧开胸术。左前外侧开胸术治疗无房间隔缺损的左侧部分肺静脉连接异常。
Comparison of different approaches applied for surgical correction of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection.
Background: Right anterolateral thoracotomy or left anterolateral thoracotomy applied to partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection correction have been reported to obtain cosmetic and less invasive outcomes as alternative approaches to median sternotomy. However, the application of different approaches is still confusing. We compared the perioperative and mid-term outcomes to seek indications of different approaches and guide surgical treatment of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection.
Methods: From July 2019 to August 2023, 44 patients who underwent surgical correction of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection were recruited. Of these, 13 (29.6%) patients who underwent median sternotomy were separated into M group, 28 (63.6%) patients who underwent right anterolateral thoracotomy were separated into R group, and three (6.8%) patients who underwent left anterolateral thoracotomy were separated into L group. Clinical data were reviewed and compared between each group.
Results: In M group, direct anastomosis accounted for the most (7, 53.8%), in R group, intra-atrial rerouting accounted for the most (22, 78.6%), and in L group, direct anastomosis accounted for the most (3, 100%). R group had shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (70.0 ± 32.4 vs113.1 ± 83.3, p = 0.029), shorter ICU stay (1.0 ± 0.2 vs 1.9 ± 1.7, p = 0.01), shorter postoperative stay (6.0 ± 1.2 vs 8.3 ± 5.0, p = 0.021), and fewer chest tube drainage (8.4 ± 4.3 vs 13.9 ± 10.2, p = 0.026) compared with M group. Three left-sided partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection in L group adopted off-pump approach.
Conclusions: Median sternotomy S.V.C. can be applicable to all anatomic types of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection especially for complex types. Considering the minimally invasive advantages, we prefer applying right anterolateral thoracotomy for pulmonary vein connected to right atrium or proximal end of off-pump. Applying left anterolateral thoracotomy for left-sided partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection without atrial septal defect by off-pump.
期刊介绍:
Cardiology in the Young is devoted to cardiovascular issues affecting the young, and the older patient suffering the sequels of congenital heart disease, or other cardiac diseases acquired in childhood. The journal serves the interests of all professionals concerned with these topics. By design, the journal is international and multidisciplinary in its approach, and members of the editorial board take an active role in the its mission, helping to make it the essential journal in paediatric cardiology. All aspects of paediatric cardiology are covered within the journal. The content includes original articles, brief reports, editorials, reviews, and papers devoted to continuing professional development.