利用放射学特征预测前列腺癌分级。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yasuhiro Yamamoto, Takafumi Haraguchi, Kaori Matsuda, Yoshio Okazaki, Shin Kimoto, Nozomu Tanji, Atsushi Matsumoto, Yasuyuki Kobayashi, Hidefumi Mimura, Takao Hiraki
{"title":"利用放射学特征预测前列腺癌分级。","authors":"Yasuhiro Yamamoto, Takafumi Haraguchi, Kaori Matsuda, Yoshio Okazaki, Shin Kimoto, Nozomu Tanji, Atsushi Matsumoto, Yasuyuki Kobayashi, Hidefumi Mimura, Takao Hiraki","doi":"10.18926/AMO/68355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We developed a machine learning model for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) grades using radiomic features of magnetic resonance imaging. 112 patients diagnosed with PCa based on prostate biopsy between January 2014 and December 2021 were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to construct two prediction models, one using radiomic features and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values (Radiomics model) and the other Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores and PSA values (PI-RADS model), to differentiate high-grade (Gleason score [GS] ≥ 8) from intermediate or low-grade (GS < 8) PCa. Five imaging features were selected for the Radiomics model using the Gini coefficient. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. The models were compared by leave-one-out cross-validation with Ridge regularization. Furthermore, the Radiomics model was evaluated using the holdout method and represented by a nomogram. The AUC of the Radiomics and PI-RADS models differed significantly (0.799, 95% CI: 0.712-0.869; and 0.710, 95% CI: 0.617-0.792, respectively). Using holdout method, the Radiomics model yielded AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.552-0.925), sensitivity of 0.769, and specificity of 0.778. It outperformed the PI-RADS model and could be useful in predicting PCa grades, potentially aiding in determining appropriate treatment approaches in PCa patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7017,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Okayama","volume":"79 1","pages":"21-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Prostate Cancer Grades Using Radiomic Features.\",\"authors\":\"Yasuhiro Yamamoto, Takafumi Haraguchi, Kaori Matsuda, Yoshio Okazaki, Shin Kimoto, Nozomu Tanji, Atsushi Matsumoto, Yasuyuki Kobayashi, Hidefumi Mimura, Takao Hiraki\",\"doi\":\"10.18926/AMO/68355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We developed a machine learning model for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) grades using radiomic features of magnetic resonance imaging. 112 patients diagnosed with PCa based on prostate biopsy between January 2014 and December 2021 were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to construct two prediction models, one using radiomic features and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values (Radiomics model) and the other Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores and PSA values (PI-RADS model), to differentiate high-grade (Gleason score [GS] ≥ 8) from intermediate or low-grade (GS < 8) PCa. Five imaging features were selected for the Radiomics model using the Gini coefficient. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. The models were compared by leave-one-out cross-validation with Ridge regularization. Furthermore, the Radiomics model was evaluated using the holdout method and represented by a nomogram. The AUC of the Radiomics and PI-RADS models differed significantly (0.799, 95% CI: 0.712-0.869; and 0.710, 95% CI: 0.617-0.792, respectively). Using holdout method, the Radiomics model yielded AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.552-0.925), sensitivity of 0.769, and specificity of 0.778. It outperformed the PI-RADS model and could be useful in predicting PCa grades, potentially aiding in determining appropriate treatment approaches in PCa patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta medica Okayama\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"21-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta medica Okayama\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/68355\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Okayama","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/68355","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们开发了一种机器学习模型,用于使用磁共振成像的放射学特征预测前列腺癌(PCa)等级。对2014年1月至2021年12月期间通过前列腺活检诊断为PCa的112例患者进行了评估。采用Logistic回归构建两种预测模型,一种使用放射组学特征和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)值(Radiomics模型),另一种使用前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分和PSA值(PI-RADS模型),用于区分高级别(Gleason评分[GS]≥8)和中低级别(GS < 8) PCa。使用基尼系数为Radiomics模型选择了五个成像特征。使用AUC、敏感性和特异性评估模型性能。模型通过留一交叉验证和Ridge正则化进行比较。此外,Radiomics模型使用holdout方法进行评估,并用nomogram表示。放射组学模型和PI-RADS模型的AUC差异显著(0.799,95% CI: 0.712-0.869;和0.710,95% CI分别为0.617-0.792)。采用holdout方法,Radiomics模型的AUC为0.778 (95% CI: 0.552-0.925),敏感性为0.769,特异性为0.778。它优于PI-RADS模型,可用于预测PCa等级,潜在地帮助确定PCa患者的适当治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of Prostate Cancer Grades Using Radiomic Features.

We developed a machine learning model for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) grades using radiomic features of magnetic resonance imaging. 112 patients diagnosed with PCa based on prostate biopsy between January 2014 and December 2021 were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to construct two prediction models, one using radiomic features and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values (Radiomics model) and the other Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores and PSA values (PI-RADS model), to differentiate high-grade (Gleason score [GS] ≥ 8) from intermediate or low-grade (GS < 8) PCa. Five imaging features were selected for the Radiomics model using the Gini coefficient. Model performance was evaluated using AUC, sensitivity, and specificity. The models were compared by leave-one-out cross-validation with Ridge regularization. Furthermore, the Radiomics model was evaluated using the holdout method and represented by a nomogram. The AUC of the Radiomics and PI-RADS models differed significantly (0.799, 95% CI: 0.712-0.869; and 0.710, 95% CI: 0.617-0.792, respectively). Using holdout method, the Radiomics model yielded AUC of 0.778 (95% CI: 0.552-0.925), sensitivity of 0.769, and specificity of 0.778. It outperformed the PI-RADS model and could be useful in predicting PCa grades, potentially aiding in determining appropriate treatment approaches in PCa patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta medica Okayama
Acta medica Okayama 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Medica Okayama (AMO) publishes papers relating to all areas of basic and clinical medical science. Papers may be submitted by those not affiliated with Okayama University. Only original papers which have not been published or submitted elsewhere and timely review articles should be submitted. Original papers may be Full-length Articles or Short Communications. Case Reports are considered if they describe significant and substantial new findings. Preliminary observations are not accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信