通过大众专业知识塑造金融市场的集体行动:对 WallStreetBets 上 "尽职调查 "帖子的分析

IF 3.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yves Gendron , Alexandre Madelaine , Luc Paugam , Hervé Stolowy
{"title":"通过大众专业知识塑造金融市场的集体行动:对 WallStreetBets 上 \"尽职调查 \"帖子的分析","authors":"Yves Gendron ,&nbsp;Alexandre Madelaine ,&nbsp;Luc Paugam ,&nbsp;Hervé Stolowy","doi":"10.1016/j.aos.2024.101588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2021, a social movement rallying retail investors unexpectedly shocked Wall Street, forcing a prominent multi-billion-dollar hedge fund to shut down one year later, after incurring massive financial losses. Social movements in financial markets have significantly developed in the wake of the 2007–09 financial crisis, resulting in the emergence of various collective actions. We analyze one recent example of such action undertaken by the r/WallStreetBets (WSB) community on Reddit, which disrupted the stock prices of several “meme stocks” (e.g., GameStop) by disseminating influential investment narratives. We analyze the 150 most upvoted Due Diligence posts on WSB and interview eight members of its community. We find that a popular expertise in investment narratives emerged, developed, and was propagated on this digital platform. WSB authors' claim to popular expertise is made in a hybrid language combining traditional financial expertise with an accessible and entertaining writing style, complemented by references to pop culture. Our analysis brings out a growing resentment among retail investors about the unfairness of financial markets, and its role in mobilizing them for collective action that challenged the existing order of things. Yet this widespread resentment did not spontaneously translate into a meaningful, sustainable collective action initiative. Our thesis is that the development of popular expertise played an instrumental role in the formation of WSB's collective action initiative targeting several perceived investment opportunities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48379,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Organizations and Society","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 101588"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shaping collective action in financial markets through popular expertise: An analysis of Due Diligence posts on WallStreetBets\",\"authors\":\"Yves Gendron ,&nbsp;Alexandre Madelaine ,&nbsp;Luc Paugam ,&nbsp;Hervé Stolowy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aos.2024.101588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In 2021, a social movement rallying retail investors unexpectedly shocked Wall Street, forcing a prominent multi-billion-dollar hedge fund to shut down one year later, after incurring massive financial losses. Social movements in financial markets have significantly developed in the wake of the 2007–09 financial crisis, resulting in the emergence of various collective actions. We analyze one recent example of such action undertaken by the r/WallStreetBets (WSB) community on Reddit, which disrupted the stock prices of several “meme stocks” (e.g., GameStop) by disseminating influential investment narratives. We analyze the 150 most upvoted Due Diligence posts on WSB and interview eight members of its community. We find that a popular expertise in investment narratives emerged, developed, and was propagated on this digital platform. WSB authors' claim to popular expertise is made in a hybrid language combining traditional financial expertise with an accessible and entertaining writing style, complemented by references to pop culture. Our analysis brings out a growing resentment among retail investors about the unfairness of financial markets, and its role in mobilizing them for collective action that challenged the existing order of things. Yet this widespread resentment did not spontaneously translate into a meaningful, sustainable collective action initiative. Our thesis is that the development of popular expertise played an instrumental role in the formation of WSB's collective action initiative targeting several perceived investment opportunities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting Organizations and Society\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting Organizations and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368224000485\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Organizations and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368224000485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021年,一场召集散户投资者的社会运动出乎意料地震惊了华尔街,迫使一家知名的数十亿美元对冲基金在遭受巨额财务损失后,在一年后关闭。金融市场的社会运动在2007-09年金融危机之后显著发展,导致各种集体行动的出现。我们分析了Reddit上r/WallStreetBets (WSB)社区最近采取的此类行动的一个例子,该社区通过传播有影响力的投资叙事,扰乱了几只“模因股”(例如GameStop)的股价。我们分析了WSB上150个投票最多的尽职调查帖子,并采访了其社区的8名成员。我们发现,在这个数字平台上,一种流行的投资叙事专业知识出现、发展和传播。《华尔街日报》的作者声称自己拥有流行的专业知识,这是一种混合语言,将传统的金融专业知识与通俗易懂的娱乐写作风格结合起来,并辅以流行文化的参考。我们的分析表明,散户投资者对金融市场的不公平越来越不满,并认为金融市场在动员他们采取集体行动挑战现有秩序方面发挥了作用。然而,这种普遍的怨恨并没有自发地转化为有意义的、可持续的集体行动倡议。我们的论点是,大众专业知识的发展在WSB针对几个感知到的投资机会的集体行动倡议的形成中发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shaping collective action in financial markets through popular expertise: An analysis of Due Diligence posts on WallStreetBets
In 2021, a social movement rallying retail investors unexpectedly shocked Wall Street, forcing a prominent multi-billion-dollar hedge fund to shut down one year later, after incurring massive financial losses. Social movements in financial markets have significantly developed in the wake of the 2007–09 financial crisis, resulting in the emergence of various collective actions. We analyze one recent example of such action undertaken by the r/WallStreetBets (WSB) community on Reddit, which disrupted the stock prices of several “meme stocks” (e.g., GameStop) by disseminating influential investment narratives. We analyze the 150 most upvoted Due Diligence posts on WSB and interview eight members of its community. We find that a popular expertise in investment narratives emerged, developed, and was propagated on this digital platform. WSB authors' claim to popular expertise is made in a hybrid language combining traditional financial expertise with an accessible and entertaining writing style, complemented by references to pop culture. Our analysis brings out a growing resentment among retail investors about the unfairness of financial markets, and its role in mobilizing them for collective action that challenged the existing order of things. Yet this widespread resentment did not spontaneously translate into a meaningful, sustainable collective action initiative. Our thesis is that the development of popular expertise played an instrumental role in the formation of WSB's collective action initiative targeting several perceived investment opportunities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Accounting, Organizations & Society is a major international journal concerned with all aspects of the relationship between accounting and human behaviour, organizational structures and processes, and the changing social and political environment of the enterprise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信