{"title":"Uq(sl2)的Clebsch-Gordan系数与Grassmann图的Terwilliger代数之间难以察觉的联系","authors":"Hau-Wen Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcta.2025.106028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Clebsch–Gordan coefficients of <span><math><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span> are expressible in terms of Hahn polynomials. The phenomenon can be explained by an algebra homomorphism ♮ from the universal Hahn algebra <span><math><mi>H</mi></math></span> into <span><math><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo><mo>⊗</mo><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span>. Let Ω denote a finite set of size <em>D</em> and <span><math><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow></msup></math></span> denote the power set of Ω. It is generally known that <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></msup></math></span> supports a <span><math><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span>-module. Let <em>k</em> denote an integer with <span><math><mn>0</mn><mo>≤</mo><mi>k</mi><mo>≤</mo><mi>D</mi></math></span> and fix a <em>k</em>-element subset <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> of Ω. By identifying <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></msup></math></span> with <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi><mo>∖</mo><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></msup></mrow></msup><mo>⊗</mo><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></msup></mrow></msup></math></span> this induces a <span><math><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo><mo>⊗</mo><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span>-module structure on <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></msup></math></span> denoted by <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></msup><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span>. Pulling back via ♮ the <span><math><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo><mo>⊗</mo><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span>-module <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></msup><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span> forms an <span><math><mi>H</mi></math></span>-module. When <span><math><mn>1</mn><mo>≤</mo><mi>k</mi><mo>≤</mo><mi>D</mi><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></math></span> the <span><math><mi>H</mi></math></span>-module <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></msup><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span> enfolds the Terwilliger algebra of the Johnson graph <span><math><mi>J</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>D</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>k</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> with respect to <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>. This result connects these two seemingly irrelevant topics: The Clebsch–Gordan coefficients of <span><math><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span> and the Terwilliger algebras of Johnson graphs. Unfortunately some steps break down in the <em>q</em>-analog case. By making detours, the imperceptible connection between the Clebsch–Gordan coefficients of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>q</mi></mrow></msub><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span> and the Terwilliger algebras of Grassmann graphs is successfully disclosed in this paper.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50230,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A","volume":"214 ","pages":"Article 106028"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An imperceptible connection between the Clebsch–Gordan coefficients of Uq(sl2) and the Terwilliger algebras of Grassmann graphs\",\"authors\":\"Hau-Wen Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcta.2025.106028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Clebsch–Gordan coefficients of <span><math><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span> are expressible in terms of Hahn polynomials. The phenomenon can be explained by an algebra homomorphism ♮ from the universal Hahn algebra <span><math><mi>H</mi></math></span> into <span><math><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo><mo>⊗</mo><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span>. Let Ω denote a finite set of size <em>D</em> and <span><math><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow></msup></math></span> denote the power set of Ω. It is generally known that <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></msup></math></span> supports a <span><math><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span>-module. Let <em>k</em> denote an integer with <span><math><mn>0</mn><mo>≤</mo><mi>k</mi><mo>≤</mo><mi>D</mi></math></span> and fix a <em>k</em>-element subset <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> of Ω. By identifying <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></msup></math></span> with <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi><mo>∖</mo><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></msup></mrow></msup><mo>⊗</mo><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></msup></mrow></msup></math></span> this induces a <span><math><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo><mo>⊗</mo><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span>-module structure on <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></msup></math></span> denoted by <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></msup><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span>. Pulling back via ♮ the <span><math><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo><mo>⊗</mo><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span>-module <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></msup><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span> forms an <span><math><mi>H</mi></math></span>-module. When <span><math><mn>1</mn><mo>≤</mo><mi>k</mi><mo>≤</mo><mi>D</mi><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></math></span> the <span><math><mi>H</mi></math></span>-module <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>C</mi></mrow><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow></msup></mrow></msup><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span> enfolds the Terwilliger algebra of the Johnson graph <span><math><mi>J</mi><mo>(</mo><mi>D</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>k</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> with respect to <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>x</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>. This result connects these two seemingly irrelevant topics: The Clebsch–Gordan coefficients of <span><math><mi>U</mi><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span> and the Terwilliger algebras of Johnson graphs. Unfortunately some steps break down in the <em>q</em>-analog case. By making detours, the imperceptible connection between the Clebsch–Gordan coefficients of <span><math><msub><mrow><mi>U</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>q</mi></mrow></msub><mo>(</mo><msub><mrow><mi>sl</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub><mo>)</mo></math></span> and the Terwilliger algebras of Grassmann graphs is successfully disclosed in this paper.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A\",\"volume\":\"214 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106028\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0097316525000238\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series A","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0097316525000238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
An imperceptible connection between the Clebsch–Gordan coefficients of Uq(sl2) and the Terwilliger algebras of Grassmann graphs
The Clebsch–Gordan coefficients of are expressible in terms of Hahn polynomials. The phenomenon can be explained by an algebra homomorphism ♮ from the universal Hahn algebra into . Let Ω denote a finite set of size D and denote the power set of Ω. It is generally known that supports a -module. Let k denote an integer with and fix a k-element subset of Ω. By identifying with this induces a -module structure on denoted by . Pulling back via ♮ the -module forms an -module. When the -module enfolds the Terwilliger algebra of the Johnson graph with respect to . This result connects these two seemingly irrelevant topics: The Clebsch–Gordan coefficients of and the Terwilliger algebras of Johnson graphs. Unfortunately some steps break down in the q-analog case. By making detours, the imperceptible connection between the Clebsch–Gordan coefficients of and the Terwilliger algebras of Grassmann graphs is successfully disclosed in this paper.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Combinatorial Theory publishes original mathematical research concerned with theoretical and physical aspects of the study of finite and discrete structures in all branches of science. Series A is concerned primarily with structures, designs, and applications of combinatorics and is a valuable tool for mathematicians and computer scientists.