城市排水系统构件水力效率评价方法

IF 6.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Kamil Pochwat
{"title":"城市排水系统构件水力效率评价方法","authors":"Kamil Pochwat","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates the performance of different retention solutions in stormwater drainage systems. The outcome of this study proposes a method to determine the hydraulic efficiency of different stormwater drainage retention components, in which instead of assessing retention capacities, the resistance time is used. The study was conducted in a laboratory setting, involving four different hydraulic units designed to increase channel retention in the drainage system. These units operate under diverse hydraulic conditions, including varying channel gradients, different inflow rates, and differential outflow reductions. The analysed units included a linear system (<em>U1</em>), a linear system with increased retention (<em>U2</em> and <em>U4</em>), and a ring system (<em>U3</em>). The experiments conducted laid the groundwork for a method to determine the hydraulic efficiency of drainage components in situations where estimating efficiency based on the analysis of required capacities is impossible or very time-consuming. The research results were utilised to assess the hydraulic efficiency of the studied hydraulic units <em>U1</em>-<em>U4</em>. The results of this study indicated a significantly higher efficiency of ring systems (<em>U3</em>) under all input scenarios at the highest tested flows (12L/s). In specific cases, its application allowed for over a 5-fold extension of the system’s correct operation time, and the determined hydraulic efficiency coefficient α values ranged between 4.5 and 11.4. For lower flows (10 L/s), the most effective system varied depending on the hydraulic conditions, with the channel gradient identified as the parameter that most significantly influenced the efficiency of individual solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"655 ","pages":"Article 132975"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment method for the hydraulic efficiency of urban drainage system components\",\"authors\":\"Kamil Pochwat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study evaluates the performance of different retention solutions in stormwater drainage systems. The outcome of this study proposes a method to determine the hydraulic efficiency of different stormwater drainage retention components, in which instead of assessing retention capacities, the resistance time is used. The study was conducted in a laboratory setting, involving four different hydraulic units designed to increase channel retention in the drainage system. These units operate under diverse hydraulic conditions, including varying channel gradients, different inflow rates, and differential outflow reductions. The analysed units included a linear system (<em>U1</em>), a linear system with increased retention (<em>U2</em> and <em>U4</em>), and a ring system (<em>U3</em>). The experiments conducted laid the groundwork for a method to determine the hydraulic efficiency of drainage components in situations where estimating efficiency based on the analysis of required capacities is impossible or very time-consuming. The research results were utilised to assess the hydraulic efficiency of the studied hydraulic units <em>U1</em>-<em>U4</em>. The results of this study indicated a significantly higher efficiency of ring systems (<em>U3</em>) under all input scenarios at the highest tested flows (12L/s). In specific cases, its application allowed for over a 5-fold extension of the system’s correct operation time, and the determined hydraulic efficiency coefficient α values ranged between 4.5 and 11.4. For lower flows (10 L/s), the most effective system varied depending on the hydraulic conditions, with the channel gradient identified as the parameter that most significantly influenced the efficiency of individual solutions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"655 \",\"pages\":\"Article 132975\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425003130\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425003130","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了不同截留溶液在雨水排水系统中的性能。本研究的结果提出了一种确定不同雨水排水截留成分水力效率的方法,其中使用阻力时间而不是评估截留能力。这项研究是在实验室环境中进行的,涉及四种不同的液压装置,旨在增加排水系统中的通道保留。这些装置在不同的水力条件下运行,包括不同的渠道梯度、不同的流入速率和不同的流出量减少。所分析的单元包括一个线性系统(U1),一个增加保留率的线性系统(U2和U4)和一个环系统(U3)。所进行的实验为确定排水部件水力效率的方法奠定了基础,在这种情况下,根据所需能力的分析来估计效率是不可能的或非常耗时的。将研究结果用于评估所研究的液压单元U1-U4的液压效率。本研究结果表明,在最高测试流量(12L/s)下,环形系统(U3)在所有输入场景下的效率都显著提高。在特定情况下,它的应用使系统的正确运行时间延长了5倍以上,确定的水力效率系数α值在4.5到11.4之间。对于较低的流量(10 L/s),最有效的系统根据水力条件而变化,通道梯度被确定为最显著影响单个解决方案效率的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessment method for the hydraulic efficiency of urban drainage system components

Assessment method for the hydraulic efficiency of urban drainage system components
This study evaluates the performance of different retention solutions in stormwater drainage systems. The outcome of this study proposes a method to determine the hydraulic efficiency of different stormwater drainage retention components, in which instead of assessing retention capacities, the resistance time is used. The study was conducted in a laboratory setting, involving four different hydraulic units designed to increase channel retention in the drainage system. These units operate under diverse hydraulic conditions, including varying channel gradients, different inflow rates, and differential outflow reductions. The analysed units included a linear system (U1), a linear system with increased retention (U2 and U4), and a ring system (U3). The experiments conducted laid the groundwork for a method to determine the hydraulic efficiency of drainage components in situations where estimating efficiency based on the analysis of required capacities is impossible or very time-consuming. The research results were utilised to assess the hydraulic efficiency of the studied hydraulic units U1-U4. The results of this study indicated a significantly higher efficiency of ring systems (U3) under all input scenarios at the highest tested flows (12L/s). In specific cases, its application allowed for over a 5-fold extension of the system’s correct operation time, and the determined hydraulic efficiency coefficient α values ranged between 4.5 and 11.4. For lower flows (10 L/s), the most effective system varied depending on the hydraulic conditions, with the channel gradient identified as the parameter that most significantly influenced the efficiency of individual solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信