9种中成药治疗心肌梗死后心力衰竭的比较疗效研究:贝叶斯网络

Fuyun Jia , Shengwei Gao , Qiaochu Zhu , Opoku Bonsu Francis , Rui Liu , Yadong Wang , Rui Zhang , Shichuan Chen , Zilian Zhan , Xi Zhang , Qiang Xu
{"title":"9种中成药治疗心肌梗死后心力衰竭的比较疗效研究:贝叶斯网络","authors":"Fuyun Jia ,&nbsp;Shengwei Gao ,&nbsp;Qiaochu Zhu ,&nbsp;Opoku Bonsu Francis ,&nbsp;Rui Liu ,&nbsp;Yadong Wang ,&nbsp;Rui Zhang ,&nbsp;Shichuan Chen ,&nbsp;Zilian Zhan ,&nbsp;Xi Zhang ,&nbsp;Qiang Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.prmcm.2025.100595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Heart failure (HF) is a rapidly growing public health issue with an estimated prevalence of 64 million people globally. After many years of use and development, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has accumulated rich clinical usefulness in many diseases. This network meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of nine different Chinese traditional patent medicines (CTPMs) in the treatment of heart failure developing after acute myocardial infarction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Determine the eligibility criteria for inclusion and exclusion in advance. Starting from literature search until September 20, 2024, conduct comprehensive data retrieval on 7 different databases. Network plots, league tables, surface-under-the-cumulative ranking (SUCRA), and funnel plots were created for each outcome. A previous registration (PROSPERO CRD42024519394) of this review protocol was undertaken.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 56 eligible RCTs involving 5,567 patients with heart failure secondary to acute myocardial infarction in which nine CTPMs were used as treatment are included. The CTPMs included <em>Qili Qiangxin</em> capsule (QLQXC), Compound <em>Danshen Dripping</em> Pills (CDDP), <em>Shexiang Baoxin</em> pill (SXBXP), Stilbene <em>yiqi</em> dropping refs (SYQDR), <em>Xintong</em> oral liquid (XTOL), <em>Wenxin</em> granule (WXG), <em>Tongxinluo</em> capsule (TXLC), and <em>Guanxinshutong</em> capsule (GXSTC) and <em>Huangqibaoxin</em> particle (HQBXP). The experimental group received CTPM therapy in addition to conventional Western medicine (CWM) treatment, whereas the control group received just CWM treatment. The results showed that compared to those treated with CWM alone, those treated with CPTM + CWM considerably improved in all relevant measures. When evaluating clinical effectiveness based on left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and the New York Heart Association's (NYHA) cardiac functional classification, WXG + CWM was shown to be the most successful in enhancing cardiac efficiency. The 6-minute walking test results were most improved by SXBXP + CWM, but N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide reduction, left ventricular ejection percent, and left ventricular end-systolic diameter were best achieved by XTOL + CWM. When compared to the other combination treatments, the QLQXC + CWM therapy was the most successful in increasing left ventricular end-diastolic volume while the GXSTC + CWM treatment was the most successful in increasing left ventricular end-systolic volume. There were no appreciable variations in safety between the groups treated with CWM alone and the ones treated with CTPMs plus CWM.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>In contrast to CWM therapy alone, the combination of CTPMs and CWM treatment offers greater therapeutic benefits and is safe for treating heart failure that follows an acute myocardial infarction. For heart failure that develops after an acute myocardial infarction, combo therapy using WXG + CWM and QLQXC + CWM may be the best integrative medicine-based interventions. Due to the study's limitations, additional large-scale, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trials with high quality are required for comprehensive validation and to establish a solid body of evidence supporting the prudent use of medications in the treatment of heart failure resulting from acute myocardial infarction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Research - Modern Chinese Medicine","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100595"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy studies of nine Chinese traditional patent medicines for the treatment of post-myocardial infarction heart failure: A Bayesian network\",\"authors\":\"Fuyun Jia ,&nbsp;Shengwei Gao ,&nbsp;Qiaochu Zhu ,&nbsp;Opoku Bonsu Francis ,&nbsp;Rui Liu ,&nbsp;Yadong Wang ,&nbsp;Rui Zhang ,&nbsp;Shichuan Chen ,&nbsp;Zilian Zhan ,&nbsp;Xi Zhang ,&nbsp;Qiang Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prmcm.2025.100595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Heart failure (HF) is a rapidly growing public health issue with an estimated prevalence of 64 million people globally. After many years of use and development, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has accumulated rich clinical usefulness in many diseases. This network meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of nine different Chinese traditional patent medicines (CTPMs) in the treatment of heart failure developing after acute myocardial infarction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Determine the eligibility criteria for inclusion and exclusion in advance. Starting from literature search until September 20, 2024, conduct comprehensive data retrieval on 7 different databases. Network plots, league tables, surface-under-the-cumulative ranking (SUCRA), and funnel plots were created for each outcome. A previous registration (PROSPERO CRD42024519394) of this review protocol was undertaken.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 56 eligible RCTs involving 5,567 patients with heart failure secondary to acute myocardial infarction in which nine CTPMs were used as treatment are included. The CTPMs included <em>Qili Qiangxin</em> capsule (QLQXC), Compound <em>Danshen Dripping</em> Pills (CDDP), <em>Shexiang Baoxin</em> pill (SXBXP), Stilbene <em>yiqi</em> dropping refs (SYQDR), <em>Xintong</em> oral liquid (XTOL), <em>Wenxin</em> granule (WXG), <em>Tongxinluo</em> capsule (TXLC), and <em>Guanxinshutong</em> capsule (GXSTC) and <em>Huangqibaoxin</em> particle (HQBXP). The experimental group received CTPM therapy in addition to conventional Western medicine (CWM) treatment, whereas the control group received just CWM treatment. The results showed that compared to those treated with CWM alone, those treated with CPTM + CWM considerably improved in all relevant measures. When evaluating clinical effectiveness based on left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and the New York Heart Association's (NYHA) cardiac functional classification, WXG + CWM was shown to be the most successful in enhancing cardiac efficiency. The 6-minute walking test results were most improved by SXBXP + CWM, but N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide reduction, left ventricular ejection percent, and left ventricular end-systolic diameter were best achieved by XTOL + CWM. When compared to the other combination treatments, the QLQXC + CWM therapy was the most successful in increasing left ventricular end-diastolic volume while the GXSTC + CWM treatment was the most successful in increasing left ventricular end-systolic volume. There were no appreciable variations in safety between the groups treated with CWM alone and the ones treated with CTPMs plus CWM.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>In contrast to CWM therapy alone, the combination of CTPMs and CWM treatment offers greater therapeutic benefits and is safe for treating heart failure that follows an acute myocardial infarction. For heart failure that develops after an acute myocardial infarction, combo therapy using WXG + CWM and QLQXC + CWM may be the best integrative medicine-based interventions. Due to the study's limitations, additional large-scale, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trials with high quality are required for comprehensive validation and to establish a solid body of evidence supporting the prudent use of medications in the treatment of heart failure resulting from acute myocardial infarction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacological Research - Modern Chinese Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacological Research - Modern Chinese Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667142525000247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological Research - Modern Chinese Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667142525000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心力衰竭(HF)是一个快速增长的公共卫生问题,全球估计有6400万人患有心力衰竭。经过多年的使用和发展,中医药在许多疾病中积累了丰富的临床应用价值。本网络荟萃分析旨在评估9种不同中成药(ctpm)治疗急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭的疗效。方法提前确定纳入和排除标准。从文献检索开始至2024年9月20日,对7个不同的数据库进行全面的数据检索。为每个结果创建了网络图、联赛表、累积排名表(SUCRA)和漏斗图。先前已对该审查方案进行了注册(PROSPERO CRD42024519394)。结果共纳入56项符合条件的随机对照试验,涉及5567例急性心肌梗死继发心力衰竭患者,其中9例采用ctpm治疗。中药包括七力强心胶囊(QLQXC)、复方丹参滴丸(CDDP)、舍香保心丸(SXBXP)、芪益气滴剂(SYQDR)、心通口服液(XTOL)、温心颗粒(WXG)、通心络胶囊(TXLC)、冠心舒通胶囊(GXSTC)和黄七保心颗粒(HQBXP)。实验组在常规西医治疗的基础上给予CTPM治疗,对照组仅给予CWM治疗。结果显示,与单独使用CWM治疗的患者相比,CPTM + CWM治疗的患者在所有相关指标上均有显著改善。当基于左室舒张末期直径和纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分类评估临床效果时,WXG + CWM在提高心脏效率方面最成功。SXBXP + CWM对6分钟步行试验结果的改善效果最好,但XTOL + CWM对n端脑利钠肽前还原、左室射血率和左室收缩末期内径的改善效果最好。与其他联合治疗相比,QLQXC + CWM治疗在增加左室舒张末期容积方面最成功,而GXSTC + CWM治疗在增加左室收缩末期容积方面最成功。单独用CWM治疗组和ctpm加CWM治疗组在安全性上没有明显的差异。与单独的CWM治疗相比,ctpm和CWM联合治疗提供了更大的治疗效果,并且对于治疗急性心肌梗死后的心力衰竭是安全的。对于急性心肌梗死后发生的心力衰竭,WXG + CWM和QLQXC + CWM的联合治疗可能是最好的综合医学干预措施。由于研究的局限性,需要更多的大规模、多中心、双盲、高质量的随机对照试验来进行全面验证,并建立可靠的证据来支持谨慎使用药物治疗急性心肌梗死引起的心力衰竭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative efficacy studies of nine Chinese traditional patent medicines for the treatment of post-myocardial infarction heart failure: A Bayesian network

Comparative efficacy studies of nine Chinese traditional patent medicines for the treatment of post-myocardial infarction heart failure: A Bayesian network

Introduction

Heart failure (HF) is a rapidly growing public health issue with an estimated prevalence of 64 million people globally. After many years of use and development, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has accumulated rich clinical usefulness in many diseases. This network meta-analysis aimed to assess the effectiveness of nine different Chinese traditional patent medicines (CTPMs) in the treatment of heart failure developing after acute myocardial infarction.

Methods

Determine the eligibility criteria for inclusion and exclusion in advance. Starting from literature search until September 20, 2024, conduct comprehensive data retrieval on 7 different databases. Network plots, league tables, surface-under-the-cumulative ranking (SUCRA), and funnel plots were created for each outcome. A previous registration (PROSPERO CRD42024519394) of this review protocol was undertaken.

Results

A total of 56 eligible RCTs involving 5,567 patients with heart failure secondary to acute myocardial infarction in which nine CTPMs were used as treatment are included. The CTPMs included Qili Qiangxin capsule (QLQXC), Compound Danshen Dripping Pills (CDDP), Shexiang Baoxin pill (SXBXP), Stilbene yiqi dropping refs (SYQDR), Xintong oral liquid (XTOL), Wenxin granule (WXG), Tongxinluo capsule (TXLC), and Guanxinshutong capsule (GXSTC) and Huangqibaoxin particle (HQBXP). The experimental group received CTPM therapy in addition to conventional Western medicine (CWM) treatment, whereas the control group received just CWM treatment. The results showed that compared to those treated with CWM alone, those treated with CPTM + CWM considerably improved in all relevant measures. When evaluating clinical effectiveness based on left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and the New York Heart Association's (NYHA) cardiac functional classification, WXG + CWM was shown to be the most successful in enhancing cardiac efficiency. The 6-minute walking test results were most improved by SXBXP + CWM, but N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide reduction, left ventricular ejection percent, and left ventricular end-systolic diameter were best achieved by XTOL + CWM. When compared to the other combination treatments, the QLQXC + CWM therapy was the most successful in increasing left ventricular end-diastolic volume while the GXSTC + CWM treatment was the most successful in increasing left ventricular end-systolic volume. There were no appreciable variations in safety between the groups treated with CWM alone and the ones treated with CTPMs plus CWM.

Discussion

In contrast to CWM therapy alone, the combination of CTPMs and CWM treatment offers greater therapeutic benefits and is safe for treating heart failure that follows an acute myocardial infarction. For heart failure that develops after an acute myocardial infarction, combo therapy using WXG + CWM and QLQXC + CWM may be the best integrative medicine-based interventions. Due to the study's limitations, additional large-scale, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trials with high quality are required for comprehensive validation and to establish a solid body of evidence supporting the prudent use of medications in the treatment of heart failure resulting from acute myocardial infarction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信