慢性疼痛患者阿片类药物获取障碍量表的发展

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sujith Ramachandran , Stefan Kertesz , Emily Gravlee , Prachi Prajapati , John P. Bentley , Yi Yang
{"title":"慢性疼痛患者阿片类药物获取障碍量表的发展","authors":"Sujith Ramachandran ,&nbsp;Stefan Kertesz ,&nbsp;Emily Gravlee ,&nbsp;Prachi Prajapati ,&nbsp;John P. Bentley ,&nbsp;Yi Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Measurement of accessibility is a crucial pillar in assessing equity of access to pain treatment, particularly in the context of reducing opioid prescribing in response to rising overdose deaths in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to develop an instrument to measure barriers to prescription opioid access among individuals with chronic pain and test its psychometric properties.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study used a cross-sectional online survey of a convenience sample of adults (&gt;18 years) who reported any type of pain for at least 45 days or more in the previous 3 months. The survey captured demographic characteristics, self-reported medication use characteristics, and measures such as the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form and the PROMIS Global Health measure, along with an item pool of potential questions that measure barriers to opioid access.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Respondents (<em>N</em> = 200) were 89 % women, 86 % White, averaging 45.32 years old (SD:11.79), and reported poor quality life. Two subscales, Access to Care and Patient Concerns, were identified for the Barriers to Opioid Access Scale with good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.909 and 0.835, respectively). In multivariable analyses, the Access to Care subscale was associated with the PROMIS mental health score (−2.44; 95 % CI: −3.77, −1.11), and the Patient Concerns subscale was associated with self-reported frequency of opioid use (−0.70; 95 % CI: −0.99, −0.40).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The newly developed BOAS has the potential to serve as a tool for capturing quality of pain treatment as well as measuring the impact of policy changes on the quality of treatment provided to patients with chronic pain.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100580"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the barriers to opioid access scale among individuals with chronic pain\",\"authors\":\"Sujith Ramachandran ,&nbsp;Stefan Kertesz ,&nbsp;Emily Gravlee ,&nbsp;Prachi Prajapati ,&nbsp;John P. Bentley ,&nbsp;Yi Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Measurement of accessibility is a crucial pillar in assessing equity of access to pain treatment, particularly in the context of reducing opioid prescribing in response to rising overdose deaths in the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to develop an instrument to measure barriers to prescription opioid access among individuals with chronic pain and test its psychometric properties.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study used a cross-sectional online survey of a convenience sample of adults (&gt;18 years) who reported any type of pain for at least 45 days or more in the previous 3 months. The survey captured demographic characteristics, self-reported medication use characteristics, and measures such as the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form and the PROMIS Global Health measure, along with an item pool of potential questions that measure barriers to opioid access.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Respondents (<em>N</em> = 200) were 89 % women, 86 % White, averaging 45.32 years old (SD:11.79), and reported poor quality life. Two subscales, Access to Care and Patient Concerns, were identified for the Barriers to Opioid Access Scale with good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.909 and 0.835, respectively). In multivariable analyses, the Access to Care subscale was associated with the PROMIS mental health score (−2.44; 95 % CI: −3.77, −1.11), and the Patient Concerns subscale was associated with self-reported frequency of opioid use (−0.70; 95 % CI: −0.99, −0.40).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The newly developed BOAS has the potential to serve as a tool for capturing quality of pain treatment as well as measuring the impact of policy changes on the quality of treatment provided to patients with chronic pain.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

测量可及性是评估获得疼痛治疗公平性的关键支柱,特别是在减少阿片类药物处方以应对美国过量死亡人数上升的背景下。本研究的目的是开发一种测量慢性疼痛患者处方阿片类药物获取障碍的工具,并测试其心理测量特性。方法:本研究采用在线横断面调查的方法,选取了在过去3个月内报告任何类型的疼痛至少45天或更长时间的成年人(18岁)作为方便样本。该调查捕获了人口统计学特征、自我报告的药物使用特征以及诸如简短疼痛清单-短表和PROMIS全球健康措施等措施,以及衡量阿片类药物获取障碍的潜在问题库。结果200例患者中女性占89%,白人占86%,平均年龄45.32岁(SD:11.79),生活质量较差。阿片类药物可及性障碍量表的两个子量表“可及性”和“患者关注”具有良好的内部一致性信度(α分别为0.909和0.835)。在多变量分析中,获得护理的子量表与PROMIS心理健康评分相关(- 2.44;95% CI:−3.77,−1.11),患者关注子量表与自我报告的阿片类药物使用频率相关(−0.70;95% ci:−0.99,−0.40)。结论新开发的BOAS有潜力作为捕获疼痛治疗质量的工具,以及衡量政策变化对慢性疼痛患者治疗质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of the barriers to opioid access scale among individuals with chronic pain

Background

Measurement of accessibility is a crucial pillar in assessing equity of access to pain treatment, particularly in the context of reducing opioid prescribing in response to rising overdose deaths in the United States.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to develop an instrument to measure barriers to prescription opioid access among individuals with chronic pain and test its psychometric properties.

Methods

This study used a cross-sectional online survey of a convenience sample of adults (>18 years) who reported any type of pain for at least 45 days or more in the previous 3 months. The survey captured demographic characteristics, self-reported medication use characteristics, and measures such as the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form and the PROMIS Global Health measure, along with an item pool of potential questions that measure barriers to opioid access.

Results

Respondents (N = 200) were 89 % women, 86 % White, averaging 45.32 years old (SD:11.79), and reported poor quality life. Two subscales, Access to Care and Patient Concerns, were identified for the Barriers to Opioid Access Scale with good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.909 and 0.835, respectively). In multivariable analyses, the Access to Care subscale was associated with the PROMIS mental health score (−2.44; 95 % CI: −3.77, −1.11), and the Patient Concerns subscale was associated with self-reported frequency of opioid use (−0.70; 95 % CI: −0.99, −0.40).

Conclusions

The newly developed BOAS has the potential to serve as a tool for capturing quality of pain treatment as well as measuring the impact of policy changes on the quality of treatment provided to patients with chronic pain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信