环境企业社会责任指引下的非合作与合作环境研发风险选择

Mingqing Xing , Sang-Ho Lee
{"title":"环境企业社会责任指引下的非合作与合作环境研发风险选择","authors":"Mingqing Xing ,&nbsp;Sang-Ho Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.igd.2025.100208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates environmental R&amp;D (ER&amp;D) risk choice by polluting duopoly firms under environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) guideline. We show that the ER&amp;D risk level under cooperative ER&amp;D is always higher than under non-cooperative ER&amp;D, resulting in a higher expected consumer surplus and lower expected environmental damage. We also demonstrate that the firm's expected profit depends on the level of ECSR while a firm's expected value under cooperative ER&amp;D is higher than that under non-cooperative ER&amp;D, which creates a conflict of interest between the shareholders' expected private value and the stakeholders' expected public value. Our analysis suggests that the government should appropriately align ECSR guideline in accordance with emission tax rate, by considering firms' coordination of cooperative or non-cooperative ER&amp;D activities on their risk choices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100674,"journal":{"name":"Innovation and Green Development","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-cooperative and cooperative environmental R&D risk choices under environmental corporate social responsibility guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Mingqing Xing ,&nbsp;Sang-Ho Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.igd.2025.100208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates environmental R&amp;D (ER&amp;D) risk choice by polluting duopoly firms under environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) guideline. We show that the ER&amp;D risk level under cooperative ER&amp;D is always higher than under non-cooperative ER&amp;D, resulting in a higher expected consumer surplus and lower expected environmental damage. We also demonstrate that the firm's expected profit depends on the level of ECSR while a firm's expected value under cooperative ER&amp;D is higher than that under non-cooperative ER&amp;D, which creates a conflict of interest between the shareholders' expected private value and the stakeholders' expected public value. Our analysis suggests that the government should appropriately align ECSR guideline in accordance with emission tax rate, by considering firms' coordination of cooperative or non-cooperative ER&amp;D activities on their risk choices.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation and Green Development\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation and Green Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753125000050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation and Green Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753125000050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了环境企业社会责任指导下污染双寡头企业环境研发的风险选择。研究结果表明,合作型企业的环境污染风险水平始终高于非合作型企业,导致企业的预期消费者剩余更高,预期环境损害更小。我们还证明了企业的期望利润取决于企业社会责任的水平,而合作企业的期望价值高于非合作企业的期望价值,这就造成了股东的期望私人价值和利益相关者的期望公共价值之间的利益冲突。我们的分析表明,政府应根据企业的风险选择,考虑企业对合作或非合作的环保活动的协调程度,适当调整企业环境责任准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-cooperative and cooperative environmental R&D risk choices under environmental corporate social responsibility guidelines
This study investigates environmental R&D (ER&D) risk choice by polluting duopoly firms under environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR) guideline. We show that the ER&D risk level under cooperative ER&D is always higher than under non-cooperative ER&D, resulting in a higher expected consumer surplus and lower expected environmental damage. We also demonstrate that the firm's expected profit depends on the level of ECSR while a firm's expected value under cooperative ER&D is higher than that under non-cooperative ER&D, which creates a conflict of interest between the shareholders' expected private value and the stakeholders' expected public value. Our analysis suggests that the government should appropriately align ECSR guideline in accordance with emission tax rate, by considering firms' coordination of cooperative or non-cooperative ER&D activities on their risk choices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信