通过区域比较分析对西非英语国家沿海恢复力政策的评价

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Scott Backler , K. Sian Davies-Vollum , Debadayita Raha
{"title":"通过区域比较分析对西非英语国家沿海恢复力政策的评价","authors":"Scott Backler ,&nbsp;K. Sian Davies-Vollum ,&nbsp;Debadayita Raha","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unsustainable human activities and the effects of climate change are having an increasingly negative effect along West Africa’s highly urbanised and low-lying coastal zones. While West African countries have implemented various policies to support the resilience of coastal zones, there has been limited investigation on the existence and nature of these policies. This study reviewed policies from six Anglophone countries across the West African coastal zone (Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Liberia, Nigeria and Sierra Leone) and mapped policies against key themes of coastal resilience. The themes of coastal resilience were established via a thematic analysis of relevant literature as: alternative livelihoods, acquisition of climate and coastal data, support for climate resilience, coastal zone management, conservation/ecosystem services, and indigenous knowledge. The existence and coverage of these six resilience themes within the policies of each country was mapped. Each country was then ranked according to coverage of themes in their policies using a traffic light system. The analysis revealed differences between countries in the presence and emphasis of policies supporting coastal resilience. Ghana was rated as the country with the most and broadest-ranging policy and Guinea the least. Overall policy was found to be strong on themes of data gathering and conservation and ecosystem services but weak on the themes of alternative livelihoods and inclusion of indigenous knowledge. This study can be used to understand regionally where there are gaps in policy that support coastal resilience and the existence of policy gaps related to coastal resilience for specific countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48427,"journal":{"name":"Marine Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 106648"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of coastal resilience policies in Anglophone West Africa through a regional comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Scott Backler ,&nbsp;K. Sian Davies-Vollum ,&nbsp;Debadayita Raha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Unsustainable human activities and the effects of climate change are having an increasingly negative effect along West Africa’s highly urbanised and low-lying coastal zones. While West African countries have implemented various policies to support the resilience of coastal zones, there has been limited investigation on the existence and nature of these policies. This study reviewed policies from six Anglophone countries across the West African coastal zone (Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Liberia, Nigeria and Sierra Leone) and mapped policies against key themes of coastal resilience. The themes of coastal resilience were established via a thematic analysis of relevant literature as: alternative livelihoods, acquisition of climate and coastal data, support for climate resilience, coastal zone management, conservation/ecosystem services, and indigenous knowledge. The existence and coverage of these six resilience themes within the policies of each country was mapped. Each country was then ranked according to coverage of themes in their policies using a traffic light system. The analysis revealed differences between countries in the presence and emphasis of policies supporting coastal resilience. Ghana was rated as the country with the most and broadest-ranging policy and Guinea the least. Overall policy was found to be strong on themes of data gathering and conservation and ecosystem services but weak on the themes of alternative livelihoods and inclusion of indigenous knowledge. This study can be used to understand regionally where there are gaps in policy that support coastal resilience and the existence of policy gaps related to coastal resilience for specific countries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine Policy\",\"volume\":\"176 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106648\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25000636\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X25000636","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不可持续的人类活动和气候变化的影响正在对西非高度城市化和低洼的沿海地区产生越来越大的负面影响。虽然西非国家实施了各种政策来支持沿海地区的恢复力,但对这些政策的存在和性质的调查有限。本研究回顾了西非沿海地区六个英语国家(冈比亚、加纳、几内亚、利比里亚、尼日利亚和塞拉利昂)的政策,并针对沿海复原力的关键主题绘制了政策地图。通过对相关文献的专题分析,确定了沿海复原力的主题:替代生计、气候和沿海数据的获取、对气候复原力的支持、海岸带管理、保护/生态系统服务和土著知识。绘制了这六个复原力主题在每个国家政策中的存在和覆盖范围。然后,根据使用交通灯系统的政策中主题的覆盖范围,对每个国家进行排名。分析显示,各国在支持沿海恢复力的政策的存在和重点方面存在差异。加纳被评为政策最多、范围最广的国家,几内亚则被评为政策最少的国家。总体政策在数据收集、保护和生态系统服务等主题上表现突出,但在替代生计和融入土著知识等主题上表现薄弱。本研究可用于了解在支持沿海恢复力的政策方面存在区域差距的地方,以及特定国家沿海恢复力相关政策差距的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evaluation of coastal resilience policies in Anglophone West Africa through a regional comparative analysis
Unsustainable human activities and the effects of climate change are having an increasingly negative effect along West Africa’s highly urbanised and low-lying coastal zones. While West African countries have implemented various policies to support the resilience of coastal zones, there has been limited investigation on the existence and nature of these policies. This study reviewed policies from six Anglophone countries across the West African coastal zone (Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Liberia, Nigeria and Sierra Leone) and mapped policies against key themes of coastal resilience. The themes of coastal resilience were established via a thematic analysis of relevant literature as: alternative livelihoods, acquisition of climate and coastal data, support for climate resilience, coastal zone management, conservation/ecosystem services, and indigenous knowledge. The existence and coverage of these six resilience themes within the policies of each country was mapped. Each country was then ranked according to coverage of themes in their policies using a traffic light system. The analysis revealed differences between countries in the presence and emphasis of policies supporting coastal resilience. Ghana was rated as the country with the most and broadest-ranging policy and Guinea the least. Overall policy was found to be strong on themes of data gathering and conservation and ecosystem services but weak on the themes of alternative livelihoods and inclusion of indigenous knowledge. This study can be used to understand regionally where there are gaps in policy that support coastal resilience and the existence of policy gaps related to coastal resilience for specific countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Policy
Marine Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
13.20%
发文量
428
期刊介绍: Marine Policy is the leading journal of ocean policy studies. It offers researchers, analysts and policy makers a unique combination of analyses in the principal social science disciplines relevant to the formulation of marine policy. Major articles are contributed by specialists in marine affairs, including marine economists and marine resource managers, political scientists, marine scientists, international lawyers, geographers and anthropologists. Drawing on their expertise and research, the journal covers: international, regional and national marine policies; institutional arrangements for the management and regulation of marine activities, including fisheries and shipping; conflict resolution; marine pollution and environment; conservation and use of marine resources. Regular features of Marine Policy include research reports, conference reports and reports on current developments to keep readers up-to-date with the latest developments and research in ocean affairs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信