用吸力溶出仪测定全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质从土壤中浸出到地下水的潜力综述

IF 11.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jed Costanza, Charles D. Clabaugh, Christa Leibli, James Ferreira, Richard T. Wilkin
{"title":"用吸力溶出仪测定全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质从土壤中浸出到地下水的潜力综述","authors":"Jed Costanza, Charles D. Clabaugh, Christa Leibli, James Ferreira, Richard T. Wilkin","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c10246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In-situ porewater samples were proposed to best represent the fraction of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) with the potential to migrate to groundwater. While there are many techniques for collecting porewater samples, suction lysimeters are frequently being used for PFAS investigations. Suction lysimeters use vacuum to extract porewater from vadose zone soils, typically fine to medium sands, which retain and release enough porewater for analysis. Importantly, determining the rate of PFAS migration to groundwater requires an independent measure of water percolation. This review covers the installation and sampling methods for suction lysimeters and provides suggestions to improve the utility and reduce the variability of the results. Because the volume of soil represented by the porewater sample varies significantly depending on the soil-water content, which is spatially and temporally variable, many suction lysimeters may be required to accurately represent soil heterogeneity. A similar limitation applies to soil or leaching protocol samples. Suction lysimeters may not provide a representative sample for all PFAS due to interactions with lysimeter materials, air–water interfaces, and the use of vacuum. Consequently, lysimeter data are best applied in combination with soil-leaching protocols, groundwater transects, and soil analysis when making remedial decisions.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Suction Lysimeters for Determining the Potential of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances to Leach from Soil to Groundwater: A Review\",\"authors\":\"Jed Costanza, Charles D. Clabaugh, Christa Leibli, James Ferreira, Richard T. Wilkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.est.4c10246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In-situ porewater samples were proposed to best represent the fraction of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) with the potential to migrate to groundwater. While there are many techniques for collecting porewater samples, suction lysimeters are frequently being used for PFAS investigations. Suction lysimeters use vacuum to extract porewater from vadose zone soils, typically fine to medium sands, which retain and release enough porewater for analysis. Importantly, determining the rate of PFAS migration to groundwater requires an independent measure of water percolation. This review covers the installation and sampling methods for suction lysimeters and provides suggestions to improve the utility and reduce the variability of the results. Because the volume of soil represented by the porewater sample varies significantly depending on the soil-water content, which is spatially and temporally variable, many suction lysimeters may be required to accurately represent soil heterogeneity. A similar limitation applies to soil or leaching protocol samples. Suction lysimeters may not provide a representative sample for all PFAS due to interactions with lysimeter materials, air–water interfaces, and the use of vacuum. Consequently, lysimeter data are best applied in combination with soil-leaching protocols, groundwater transects, and soil analysis when making remedial decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学与技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c10246\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c10246","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了原位孔隙水样品最能代表全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的比例,这些物质有可能迁移到地下水中。虽然有许多收集孔隙水样品的技术,但吸入溶析仪经常用于PFAS调查。吸力溶析仪使用真空从渗透带土壤中提取孔隙水,通常是细到中等的沙子,它保留和释放足够的孔隙水用于分析。重要的是,确定PFAS向地下水迁移的速率需要一个独立的水渗透测量。本文综述了吸力溶析仪的安装和采样方法,并提出了提高效用和减少结果变化的建议。由于孔隙水样品所代表的土壤体积随土壤含水量的变化而显著变化,而土壤含水量在空间和时间上都是可变的,因此可能需要许多吸力溶析仪才能准确地代表土壤的异质性。类似的限制也适用于土壤或浸出协议样品。由于与溶析仪材料、空气-水界面和真空的相互作用,吸式溶析仪可能无法为所有PFAS提供具有代表性的样品。因此,在做出补救决定时,最好将渗滤仪数据与土壤淋滤方案、地下水样带和土壤分析结合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using Suction Lysimeters for Determining the Potential of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances to Leach from Soil to Groundwater: A Review

Using Suction Lysimeters for Determining the Potential of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances to Leach from Soil to Groundwater: A Review
In-situ porewater samples were proposed to best represent the fraction of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) with the potential to migrate to groundwater. While there are many techniques for collecting porewater samples, suction lysimeters are frequently being used for PFAS investigations. Suction lysimeters use vacuum to extract porewater from vadose zone soils, typically fine to medium sands, which retain and release enough porewater for analysis. Importantly, determining the rate of PFAS migration to groundwater requires an independent measure of water percolation. This review covers the installation and sampling methods for suction lysimeters and provides suggestions to improve the utility and reduce the variability of the results. Because the volume of soil represented by the porewater sample varies significantly depending on the soil-water content, which is spatially and temporally variable, many suction lysimeters may be required to accurately represent soil heterogeneity. A similar limitation applies to soil or leaching protocol samples. Suction lysimeters may not provide a representative sample for all PFAS due to interactions with lysimeter materials, air–water interfaces, and the use of vacuum. Consequently, lysimeter data are best applied in combination with soil-leaching protocols, groundwater transects, and soil analysis when making remedial decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信