IF 3.2 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Life-Basel Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.3390/life15020325
Chrysanthi Skalioti, Maria Smyrli, Chrysoula Beletsioti, Stathis Tsiakas, Kalliopi Vallianou, John N Boletis, Smaragdi Marinaki
{"title":"Quality of Life of Donors After Living Kidney Transplantation: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Chrysanthi Skalioti, Maria Smyrli, Chrysoula Beletsioti, Stathis Tsiakas, Kalliopi Vallianou, John N Boletis, Smaragdi Marinaki","doi":"10.3390/life15020325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Living kidney transplantation yields better outcomes for recipients than deceased donation, though it may present long-term challenges for donors. This study assessed the quality of life (QoL) of living kidney donors in Greece using the SF-36 questionnaire and examined associated sociodemographic and clinical factors. This cross-sectional study included 242 clinically stable kidney donors from Laiko General Hospital's Kidney Donor Outpatient Clinic in Athens. Data on demographics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, and QoL were collected. Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to identify associations between QoL scores and influencing factors. The majority of donors were female (73.55%). Donors reported high QoL, with median PCS and MCS scores of 55.27 (49.08-57.73) and 54.17 (46.64-59.93), respectively. Male donors had higher PCS and MCS scores than females (<i>p</i> = 0.028 and <i>p</i> = 0.004). Laparoscopic nephrectomy was associated with better mental health and physical outcomes compared to open surgery (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Higher education and eGFR correlated with better PCS scores, while older age negatively affected QoL (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Living kidney donors reported a satisfactory level of overall QoL post-donation. Lower QoL scores were correlated with the female gender, older age, and open nephrectomy. These findings may further reinforce support for our current organ donation policy. Non-modifiable factors appear to influence donor quality of life. These findings reinforce the current organ donation policy while emphasizing the need for careful pre-transplant counseling and ongoing monitoring post-donation.</p>","PeriodicalId":56144,"journal":{"name":"Life-Basel","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11857444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/life15020325","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

活体肾移植对受者的疗效优于死亡捐献,但对捐献者来说可能会面临长期挑战。这项研究使用 SF-36 问卷评估了希腊活体肾脏捐献者的生活质量(QoL),并研究了相关的社会人口和临床因素。这项横断面研究包括雅典莱科综合医院肾脏捐献者门诊部的 242 名临床稳定的肾脏捐献者。研究收集了有关人口统计学、合并症、实验室参数和 QoL 的数据。斯皮尔曼相关系数用于确定QoL评分与影响因素之间的关联。大多数捐献者为女性(73.55%)。捐献者的 QoL 值较高,PCS 和 MCS 的中位数分别为 55.27(49.08-57.73)和 54.17(46.64-59.93)。男性捐献者的 PCS 和 MCS 评分高于女性(p = 0.028 和 p = 0.004)。与开放手术相比,腹腔镜肾切除术的心理健康和身体状况更好(p < 0.001)。教育程度较高和 eGFR 与更好的 PCS 评分相关,而年龄较大则对 QoL 有负面影响(p < 0.05)。活体肾脏捐献者在捐献后的总体 QoL 水平令人满意。较低的QoL评分与女性性别、年龄和开放性肾切除术有关。这些发现可能会进一步加强对我国现行器官捐献政策的支持。不可改变的因素似乎会影响捐献者的生活质量。这些发现加强了现行的器官捐献政策,同时强调了移植前仔细咨询和捐献后持续监测的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality of Life of Donors After Living Kidney Transplantation: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Living kidney transplantation yields better outcomes for recipients than deceased donation, though it may present long-term challenges for donors. This study assessed the quality of life (QoL) of living kidney donors in Greece using the SF-36 questionnaire and examined associated sociodemographic and clinical factors. This cross-sectional study included 242 clinically stable kidney donors from Laiko General Hospital's Kidney Donor Outpatient Clinic in Athens. Data on demographics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, and QoL were collected. Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to identify associations between QoL scores and influencing factors. The majority of donors were female (73.55%). Donors reported high QoL, with median PCS and MCS scores of 55.27 (49.08-57.73) and 54.17 (46.64-59.93), respectively. Male donors had higher PCS and MCS scores than females (p = 0.028 and p = 0.004). Laparoscopic nephrectomy was associated with better mental health and physical outcomes compared to open surgery (p < 0.001). Higher education and eGFR correlated with better PCS scores, while older age negatively affected QoL (p < 0.05). Living kidney donors reported a satisfactory level of overall QoL post-donation. Lower QoL scores were correlated with the female gender, older age, and open nephrectomy. These findings may further reinforce support for our current organ donation policy. Non-modifiable factors appear to influence donor quality of life. These findings reinforce the current organ donation policy while emphasizing the need for careful pre-transplant counseling and ongoing monitoring post-donation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Life-Basel
Life-Basel Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1798
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Life (ISSN 2075-1729) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of scientific studies related to fundamental themes in Life Sciences, especially those concerned with the origins of life and evolution of biosystems. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信