从手术室看:外科医生对腹腔镜胆囊切除术难度的看法。

IF 1.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-31 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.14701/ahbps.24-219
Ritika Agarwal, Vinay M D Prabhu, Nitin A R Rao
{"title":"从手术室看:外科医生对腹腔镜胆囊切除术难度的看法。","authors":"Ritika Agarwal, Vinay M D Prabhu, Nitin A R Rao","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Assessing surgical difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is challenging due to variations in surgeon proficiency and institutional protocols. This study evaluates surgeons' perspectives on procedural difficulty and examines how intraoperative findings and preoperative imaging contribute to refining difficulty assessment criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 50 laparoscopic surgeons in India, providing insights into tolerances for surgical duration and blood loss, reasons for conversion, and predictors of complexity. Responses were analyzed using SPSS, with statistical significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among surveyed surgeons, 82.0% were male, and 78.0% worked in private institutions and 52.0% had performed over 1,000 LCs. Conversion to open surgery was primarily influenced by significant blood loss (68.0%) and biliary injury (94.0%). While 38.0% preferred surgeries under 60 minutes, 26.0% imposed no time constraints. Key intraoperative challenges included dense adhesions, cholecysto-enteric fistulas, and fibrosis. Less experienced surgeons reported greater challenges with scarring adhesions and anatomical variations, but no significant differences were found for other factors like edematous or necrotic changes. Preoperative imaging was considered essential by most surgeons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the limited reliability of traditional parameters for assessing difficulty in LC. Surgeons highlighted the importance of objective intraoperative findings and preoperative imaging in predicting surgical challenges. Factors such as adhesions, fibrosis, and anatomical variations significantly impact LC difficulty, with decisions regarding conversion to open surgery largely driven by individual judgment rather than experience. Standardized grading systems incorporating these factors could improve surgical planning, reduce complications, and enhance patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":" ","pages":"150-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the operating room: Surgeons' views on difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies.\",\"authors\":\"Ritika Agarwal, Vinay M D Prabhu, Nitin A R Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.14701/ahbps.24-219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Assessing surgical difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is challenging due to variations in surgeon proficiency and institutional protocols. This study evaluates surgeons' perspectives on procedural difficulty and examines how intraoperative findings and preoperative imaging contribute to refining difficulty assessment criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 50 laparoscopic surgeons in India, providing insights into tolerances for surgical duration and blood loss, reasons for conversion, and predictors of complexity. Responses were analyzed using SPSS, with statistical significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among surveyed surgeons, 82.0% were male, and 78.0% worked in private institutions and 52.0% had performed over 1,000 LCs. Conversion to open surgery was primarily influenced by significant blood loss (68.0%) and biliary injury (94.0%). While 38.0% preferred surgeries under 60 minutes, 26.0% imposed no time constraints. Key intraoperative challenges included dense adhesions, cholecysto-enteric fistulas, and fibrosis. Less experienced surgeons reported greater challenges with scarring adhesions and anatomical variations, but no significant differences were found for other factors like edematous or necrotic changes. Preoperative imaging was considered essential by most surgeons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the limited reliability of traditional parameters for assessing difficulty in LC. Surgeons highlighted the importance of objective intraoperative findings and preoperative imaging in predicting surgical challenges. Factors such as adhesions, fibrosis, and anatomical variations significantly impact LC difficulty, with decisions regarding conversion to open surgery largely driven by individual judgment rather than experience. Standardized grading systems incorporating these factors could improve surgical planning, reduce complications, and enhance patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"150-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12093243/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的手术难度是具有挑战性的,由于外科医生的熟练程度和机构协议的变化。本研究评估了外科医生对手术难度的看法,并探讨了术中发现和术前成像如何有助于完善难度评估标准。方法:对印度50名腹腔镜外科医生进行横断面调查,提供对手术时间和出血量的耐受性、转换原因和复杂性预测因素的见解。采用SPSS统计分析,差异有统计学意义,p < 0.05。结果:受访外科医生中,男性占82.0%,78.0%在私立医疗机构工作,52.0%手术次数超过1000次。转向开腹手术的主要影响因素是大量失血(68.0%)和胆道损伤(94.0%)。而38.0%的人喜欢在60分钟内手术,26.0%的人没有时间限制。术中主要的挑战包括致密粘连、胆囊肠瘘和纤维化。经验不足的外科医生报告瘢痕性粘连和解剖变异的挑战更大,但在水肿或坏死变化等其他因素上没有发现显著差异。术前成像被大多数外科医生认为是必要的。结论:本研究强调了评估LC难度的传统参数的有限可靠性。外科医生强调了客观术中发现和术前影像学对预测手术挑战的重要性。诸如粘连、纤维化和解剖变异等因素显著影响LC难度,是否转换为开放手术主要取决于个人判断而非经验。纳入这些因素的标准化分级系统可以改善手术计划,减少并发症,提高患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From the operating room: Surgeons' views on difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Backgrounds/aims: Assessing surgical difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is challenging due to variations in surgeon proficiency and institutional protocols. This study evaluates surgeons' perspectives on procedural difficulty and examines how intraoperative findings and preoperative imaging contribute to refining difficulty assessment criteria.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 50 laparoscopic surgeons in India, providing insights into tolerances for surgical duration and blood loss, reasons for conversion, and predictors of complexity. Responses were analyzed using SPSS, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: Among surveyed surgeons, 82.0% were male, and 78.0% worked in private institutions and 52.0% had performed over 1,000 LCs. Conversion to open surgery was primarily influenced by significant blood loss (68.0%) and biliary injury (94.0%). While 38.0% preferred surgeries under 60 minutes, 26.0% imposed no time constraints. Key intraoperative challenges included dense adhesions, cholecysto-enteric fistulas, and fibrosis. Less experienced surgeons reported greater challenges with scarring adhesions and anatomical variations, but no significant differences were found for other factors like edematous or necrotic changes. Preoperative imaging was considered essential by most surgeons.

Conclusions: This study underscores the limited reliability of traditional parameters for assessing difficulty in LC. Surgeons highlighted the importance of objective intraoperative findings and preoperative imaging in predicting surgical challenges. Factors such as adhesions, fibrosis, and anatomical variations significantly impact LC difficulty, with decisions regarding conversion to open surgery largely driven by individual judgment rather than experience. Standardized grading systems incorporating these factors could improve surgical planning, reduce complications, and enhance patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信