基于能力的评分:无需紧张考试的潜在解决方案。

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Physiology Education Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1152/advan.00255.2024
Terence G Favero
{"title":"基于能力的评分:无需紧张考试的潜在解决方案。","authors":"Terence G Favero","doi":"10.1152/advan.00255.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article describes the implementation of alternative grading (AG) strategies in an upper-division kinesiology and functional human anatomy course. Traditional point-based grading systems can negatively impact student mental health, decrease intrinsic motivation, and hinder learning. To address these issues, a proficiency-based grading approach was adopted, emphasizing clearly defined standards, growth-oriented feedback, progress-indicating marks, and penalty-free reassessment opportunities. Course assessments included weekly write-ups, movement analyses, and practical examinations, with flexible submission timelines and revision opportunities. Student feedback through microassessment revealed reduced stress levels, improved time management across courses, and deeper engagement with course material. Although implementation challenges existed, particularly around the initial faculty workload, the approach demonstrated significant learning gains while supporting student well-being. Our experience suggests that alternative grading strategies can maintain academic rigor while creating a more supportive and effective learning environment in science education.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This article provides a practical implementation model for alternative grading in a science course, demonstrating how proficiency-based assessment can maintain academic rigor while reducing student stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":"416-422"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proficiency-based grading: a potential solution learning without stressful exams.\",\"authors\":\"Terence G Favero\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/advan.00255.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article describes the implementation of alternative grading (AG) strategies in an upper-division kinesiology and functional human anatomy course. Traditional point-based grading systems can negatively impact student mental health, decrease intrinsic motivation, and hinder learning. To address these issues, a proficiency-based grading approach was adopted, emphasizing clearly defined standards, growth-oriented feedback, progress-indicating marks, and penalty-free reassessment opportunities. Course assessments included weekly write-ups, movement analyses, and practical examinations, with flexible submission timelines and revision opportunities. Student feedback through microassessment revealed reduced stress levels, improved time management across courses, and deeper engagement with course material. Although implementation challenges existed, particularly around the initial faculty workload, the approach demonstrated significant learning gains while supporting student well-being. Our experience suggests that alternative grading strategies can maintain academic rigor while creating a more supportive and effective learning environment in science education.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This article provides a practical implementation model for alternative grading in a science course, demonstrating how proficiency-based assessment can maintain academic rigor while reducing student stress.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"416-422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Physiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00255.2024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00255.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章描述了在高级运动机能学和功能人体解剖学课程中实施替代评分(AG)策略。传统的基于分数的评分系统会对学生的心理健康产生负面影响,降低内在动机,阻碍学习。为了解决这些问题,采用了基于熟练程度的评分方法,强调明确定义的标准,以成长为导向的反馈,表明进步的分数,以及无处罚的重新评估机会。课程评估包括每周的书面报告、运动分析和实践考试,有灵活的提交时间和复习机会。通过微评估的学生反馈显示,压力水平降低,课程时间管理改善,对课程材料的参与程度加深。虽然实施上存在挑战,尤其是在最初的教师工作量方面,但这种方法在支持学生福利的同时,也取得了显著的学习成果。我们的经验表明,替代评分策略可以保持学术严谨性,同时在科学教育中创造一个更支持性和更有效的学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proficiency-based grading: a potential solution learning without stressful exams.

This article describes the implementation of alternative grading (AG) strategies in an upper-division kinesiology and functional human anatomy course. Traditional point-based grading systems can negatively impact student mental health, decrease intrinsic motivation, and hinder learning. To address these issues, a proficiency-based grading approach was adopted, emphasizing clearly defined standards, growth-oriented feedback, progress-indicating marks, and penalty-free reassessment opportunities. Course assessments included weekly write-ups, movement analyses, and practical examinations, with flexible submission timelines and revision opportunities. Student feedback through microassessment revealed reduced stress levels, improved time management across courses, and deeper engagement with course material. Although implementation challenges existed, particularly around the initial faculty workload, the approach demonstrated significant learning gains while supporting student well-being. Our experience suggests that alternative grading strategies can maintain academic rigor while creating a more supportive and effective learning environment in science education.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This article provides a practical implementation model for alternative grading in a science course, demonstrating how proficiency-based assessment can maintain academic rigor while reducing student stress.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信