IF 0.9 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
CoDAS Pub Date : 2025-02-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/e20230326pt
Khalil Fouad Hanna, Aline Tocchini Pascoinelli Cremonesi, Maria Regina Torloni, Giovanna Dalo Ferreira
{"title":"Knowledge, perception, and satisfaction of postpartum women about newborn hearing screening in two private Brazilian maternity hospitals.","authors":"Khalil Fouad Hanna, Aline Tocchini Pascoinelli Cremonesi, Maria Regina Torloni, Giovanna Dalo Ferreira","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/e20230326pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the knowledge, perception, and satisfaction of postpartum women about newborn hearing screening and investigate factors associated with lack of knowledge about the test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional analytical study conducted in two private Brazilian maternity hospitals. Participants were postpartum women with newborn infants eligible for hearing screening. After the hearing test, they answered an anonymous written questionnaire to assess their knowledge about, perception of, and satisfaction with the test. The characteristics of participants with and without knowledge about the test were compared using the Chi-square test. Variables with P <0.20 were included in the logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 470 postpartum women (74.1% had a university degree). Nearly 42% (n=195) had no prior knowledge about the test. Among those with prior knowledge, the main sources of information were having a previous child who had undergone the test (50.5%), and family/friends (26.2%). Primiparity (aOR 5.01, 95% CI 3.27-7.69), lack of information about the test during antenatal care (aOR 3.67, 95% CI 2.01-6.70), and no family member with hearing loss (aOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.16-3.47) were variables associated with the lack of knowledge about the test. Almost all participants (98.7%) perceived the test as very important, and 94.3% were totally satisfied with it.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though newborn hearing screening became mandatory in Brazil over a decade ago, a large proportion of postpartum women in two private hospitals had no prior knowledge about the test. However, the vast majority perceive the test as very important and are highly satisfied with it.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":"37 2","pages":"e20230326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20230326pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估产后妇女对新生儿听力筛查的了解、认知和满意度,并调查与缺乏对该检查的了解有关的因素:方法:在巴西两家私立妇产医院进行横断面分析研究。参与者为有符合听力筛查条件的新生儿的产后妇女。听力测试后,她们回答了一份匿名书面问卷,以评估她们对测试的了解、看法和满意度。我们使用卡方检验(Chi-square test)对了解和不了解该测试的参与者的特征进行了比较。结果为 P 的变量:该研究包括 470 名产后妇女(74.1% 具有大学学历)。近 42%(n=195)的受试者事先对该测试一无所知。在有相关知识的妇女中,她们的主要信息来源是曾有一个孩子接受过该检查(50.5%)和家人/朋友(26.2%)。初产妇(aOR 5.01,95% CI 3.27-7.69)、在产前护理中缺乏有关该测试的信息(aOR 3.67,95% CI 2.01-6.70)和没有听力损失家庭成员(aOR 2.00,95% CI 1.16-3.47)是与缺乏该测试知识相关的变量。几乎所有参与者(98.7%)都认为该测试非常重要,94.3%的参与者对该测试表示完全满意:尽管新生儿听力筛查早在十多年前就已在巴西成为强制性项目,但在两家私立医院中,仍有很大一部分产后妇女事先对该检查一无所知。然而,绝大多数人都认为这项检查非常重要,并对其非常满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge, perception, and satisfaction of postpartum women about newborn hearing screening in two private Brazilian maternity hospitals.

Purpose: To assess the knowledge, perception, and satisfaction of postpartum women about newborn hearing screening and investigate factors associated with lack of knowledge about the test.

Methods: Cross-sectional analytical study conducted in two private Brazilian maternity hospitals. Participants were postpartum women with newborn infants eligible for hearing screening. After the hearing test, they answered an anonymous written questionnaire to assess their knowledge about, perception of, and satisfaction with the test. The characteristics of participants with and without knowledge about the test were compared using the Chi-square test. Variables with P <0.20 were included in the logistic regression.

Results: The study included 470 postpartum women (74.1% had a university degree). Nearly 42% (n=195) had no prior knowledge about the test. Among those with prior knowledge, the main sources of information were having a previous child who had undergone the test (50.5%), and family/friends (26.2%). Primiparity (aOR 5.01, 95% CI 3.27-7.69), lack of information about the test during antenatal care (aOR 3.67, 95% CI 2.01-6.70), and no family member with hearing loss (aOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.16-3.47) were variables associated with the lack of knowledge about the test. Almost all participants (98.7%) perceived the test as very important, and 94.3% were totally satisfied with it.

Conclusion: Even though newborn hearing screening became mandatory in Brazil over a decade ago, a large proportion of postpartum women in two private hospitals had no prior knowledge about the test. However, the vast majority perceive the test as very important and are highly satisfied with it.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信