“YouTube”用于供肾切除术的外科培训和教育:是敌是友?

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Mohamed El-Mahrouk, Derar Jaradat, Tim Eichler, Robert Sucher, Christian Margreiter, Andri Lederer, Robert Karitnig, Antonia Geisler, Nora Jahn, Hans Michael Hau
{"title":"“YouTube”用于供肾切除术的外科培训和教育:是敌是友?","authors":"Mohamed El-Mahrouk, Derar Jaradat, Tim Eichler, Robert Sucher, Christian Margreiter, Andri Lederer, Robert Karitnig, Antonia Geisler, Nora Jahn, Hans Michael Hau","doi":"10.1177/23821205241301552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift toward e-learning and online education in surgical training. With the increasing prevalence of end-stage chronic kidney disease, kidney transplantation is in high demand. Donor safety is crucial in nephrectomy procedures, highlighting the importance of effective training. This study evaluates the quality and effectiveness of YouTube videos focusing on laparoscopic and robotic donor nephrectomy for surgical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On October 24, 2023, searches on YouTube for \"laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy\" and \"robotic live donor nephrectomy\" returned 121 videos, with 63 included in the study. Popularity was evaluated using the Video Power Index (VPI), while reliability and quality were assessed using the LAP-VEGaS Video Assessment Tool and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria. Additionally, a structured descriptive tool called the \"Live Donor Nephrectomy Completeness (LDNC)\" was created to evaluate the completeness and educational value of procedural technical steps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 63 videos reviewed, laparoscopic surgical procedures were depicted in 71.4% of them, while robotic approaches were shown in 28.6%. Academic backgrounds were associated with 54% of the videos, and individual physician backgrounds with 46%. Mean scores were LAP-VEGaS 9.79 ± 3.87, VPI 6.32 ± 3.31, and LDNC 9.68 ± 1.97. JAMA scores varied, with 34.9% receiving 1 point, 34.9% receiving 2 points, 17.5% receiving 3 points, and 12.7% receiving 4 points. Academic videos scored significantly higher in LAP-VEGaS and LDNC (all <i>p</i> < .01). While LAP-VEGaS, VPI, and LDNC scores correlated significantly (all <i>p</i> < .05), no correlation was found between JAMA score and other scoring systems. Videos with more clicks and likes showed significantly better scores across all measures (all <i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Amidst the challenges posed by the pandemic on surgical education, YouTube has emerged as a valuable resource for learning about laparoscopic and robotic donor nephrectomy for living kidney donation. However, the quality and reliability of these videos vary greatly, and many lack thorough reviews, leading to incomplete information. To enhance their educational value, it's proposed that videos undergo professional evaluation before publication and adhere to standardized, structured, and validated scoring systems, ensuring logical structure and improved quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205241301552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"YouTube\\\" for Surgical Training and Education in Donor Nephrectomy: Friend or Foe?\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed El-Mahrouk, Derar Jaradat, Tim Eichler, Robert Sucher, Christian Margreiter, Andri Lederer, Robert Karitnig, Antonia Geisler, Nora Jahn, Hans Michael Hau\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23821205241301552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift toward e-learning and online education in surgical training. With the increasing prevalence of end-stage chronic kidney disease, kidney transplantation is in high demand. Donor safety is crucial in nephrectomy procedures, highlighting the importance of effective training. This study evaluates the quality and effectiveness of YouTube videos focusing on laparoscopic and robotic donor nephrectomy for surgical education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On October 24, 2023, searches on YouTube for \\\"laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy\\\" and \\\"robotic live donor nephrectomy\\\" returned 121 videos, with 63 included in the study. Popularity was evaluated using the Video Power Index (VPI), while reliability and quality were assessed using the LAP-VEGaS Video Assessment Tool and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria. Additionally, a structured descriptive tool called the \\\"Live Donor Nephrectomy Completeness (LDNC)\\\" was created to evaluate the completeness and educational value of procedural technical steps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 63 videos reviewed, laparoscopic surgical procedures were depicted in 71.4% of them, while robotic approaches were shown in 28.6%. Academic backgrounds were associated with 54% of the videos, and individual physician backgrounds with 46%. Mean scores were LAP-VEGaS 9.79 ± 3.87, VPI 6.32 ± 3.31, and LDNC 9.68 ± 1.97. JAMA scores varied, with 34.9% receiving 1 point, 34.9% receiving 2 points, 17.5% receiving 3 points, and 12.7% receiving 4 points. Academic videos scored significantly higher in LAP-VEGaS and LDNC (all <i>p</i> < .01). While LAP-VEGaS, VPI, and LDNC scores correlated significantly (all <i>p</i> < .05), no correlation was found between JAMA score and other scoring systems. Videos with more clicks and likes showed significantly better scores across all measures (all <i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Amidst the challenges posed by the pandemic on surgical education, YouTube has emerged as a valuable resource for learning about laparoscopic and robotic donor nephrectomy for living kidney donation. However, the quality and reliability of these videos vary greatly, and many lack thorough reviews, leading to incomplete information. To enhance their educational value, it's proposed that videos undergo professional evaluation before publication and adhere to standardized, structured, and validated scoring systems, ensuring logical structure and improved quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"23821205241301552\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851798/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241301552\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205241301552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行加速了外科培训向电子学习和在线教育的转变。随着终末期慢性肾脏疾病的日益流行,对肾脏移植的需求越来越大。供体安全在肾切除术过程中至关重要,强调了有效培训的重要性。本研究评估了YouTube视频的质量和有效性,重点是腹腔镜和机器人供肾切除术的外科教育。方法:2023年10月24日,在YouTube上搜索“腹腔镜活体供肾切除术”和“机器人活体供肾切除术”,返回121个视频,其中63个被纳入研究。使用视频功率指数(VPI)评估受欢迎程度,而使用LAP-VEGaS视频评估工具和美国医学协会杂志(JAMA)基准标准评估可靠性和质量。此外,还创建了一个结构化的描述性工具,称为“活体供体肾切除术完整性(LDNC)”,以评估程序技术步骤的完整性和教育价值。结果:在审查的63个视频中,71.4%的视频描述了腹腔镜手术过程,而28.6%的视频显示了机器人方法。学术背景与54%的视频有关,个人医生背景与46%的视频有关。平均评分为LAP-VEGaS 9.79±3.87分,VPI 6.32±3.31分,LDNC 9.68±1.97分。JAMA评分各不相同,34.9%为1分,34.9%为2分,17.5%为3分,12.7%为4分。在LAP-VEGaS和LDNC中,学术视频的得分明显更高(所有p p p)结论:在外科教育面临大流行的挑战之际,YouTube已成为学习腹腔镜和机器人供肾切除术用于活体肾脏捐赠的宝贵资源。然而,这些视频的质量和可靠性差异很大,许多视频缺乏彻底的审查,导致信息不完整。为了提高视频的教育价值,建议在发布前对视频进行专业评估,并遵循标准化、结构化、经过验证的评分体系,保证视频的逻辑结构,提高视频的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"YouTube" for Surgical Training and Education in Donor Nephrectomy: Friend or Foe?

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift toward e-learning and online education in surgical training. With the increasing prevalence of end-stage chronic kidney disease, kidney transplantation is in high demand. Donor safety is crucial in nephrectomy procedures, highlighting the importance of effective training. This study evaluates the quality and effectiveness of YouTube videos focusing on laparoscopic and robotic donor nephrectomy for surgical education.

Methods: On October 24, 2023, searches on YouTube for "laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy" and "robotic live donor nephrectomy" returned 121 videos, with 63 included in the study. Popularity was evaluated using the Video Power Index (VPI), while reliability and quality were assessed using the LAP-VEGaS Video Assessment Tool and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria. Additionally, a structured descriptive tool called the "Live Donor Nephrectomy Completeness (LDNC)" was created to evaluate the completeness and educational value of procedural technical steps.

Results: Out of 63 videos reviewed, laparoscopic surgical procedures were depicted in 71.4% of them, while robotic approaches were shown in 28.6%. Academic backgrounds were associated with 54% of the videos, and individual physician backgrounds with 46%. Mean scores were LAP-VEGaS 9.79 ± 3.87, VPI 6.32 ± 3.31, and LDNC 9.68 ± 1.97. JAMA scores varied, with 34.9% receiving 1 point, 34.9% receiving 2 points, 17.5% receiving 3 points, and 12.7% receiving 4 points. Academic videos scored significantly higher in LAP-VEGaS and LDNC (all p < .01). While LAP-VEGaS, VPI, and LDNC scores correlated significantly (all p < .05), no correlation was found between JAMA score and other scoring systems. Videos with more clicks and likes showed significantly better scores across all measures (all p < .05).

Conclusion: Amidst the challenges posed by the pandemic on surgical education, YouTube has emerged as a valuable resource for learning about laparoscopic and robotic donor nephrectomy for living kidney donation. However, the quality and reliability of these videos vary greatly, and many lack thorough reviews, leading to incomplete information. To enhance their educational value, it's proposed that videos undergo professional evaluation before publication and adhere to standardized, structured, and validated scoring systems, ensuring logical structure and improved quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信