屠宰场牛内脏的可持续处理方法和微生物质量。

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Ana Raquel Cândido, Kamila Soares, Márcio Moura-Alves, Cristina Saraiva, Alexandra Esteves
{"title":"屠宰场牛内脏的可持续处理方法和微生物质量。","authors":"Ana Raquel Cândido, Kamila Soares, Márcio Moura-Alves, Cristina Saraiva, Alexandra Esteves","doi":"10.3390/vetsci12020153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As global income levels and population increase, meat consumption and production are rising, raising concerns about climate change, animal welfare, and environmental sustainability. Offal offers a sustainable, nutrient-rich, and economical alternative to muscle meat, providing proteins, vitamins, and minerals. This study was triggered by the scarcity of information on the microbiological quality of edible bovine offal, which is often associated with poor hygienic conditions during handling and processing at slaughterhouse. This study assessed the superficial microbiota present on cattle liver and tongue in a vertical slaughterhouse across various stages of the procurement process and on days with different slaughter volumes, with three sampling points: immediately after post-mortem inspection (Point 1); after the arrival of the viscera in the preparation room (Point 2); and in the refrigeration chamber at 3 °C (Point 3). Samples were analysed according to ISO methods for enumeration of mesophilic aerobic bacteria, <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i>, generic <i>Escherichia coli</i>, presumptive <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157, and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and detection of presumptive <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, and <i>Salmonella</i> spp. Microbiological counts were within the acceptability values stipulated in the amendment of Regulation EC 1441/2007 to Regulation EC 2073/2005 for cattle carcasses. In general, both viscera showed higher microbial counts on days with higher slaughter volumes, with the exception of <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> and <i>Staphylococcus</i> counts on the tongue. There was also an increase in microorganism levels across the offal processing stages. Out of 144 samples, 20.83% were contaminated with presumptive <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157, 3.47% <i>Salmonella</i> spp., and 25% <i>S. aureus</i>. Therefore, although 20.83% of the samples tested were presumptive for <i>E. coli</i> O157, it is important to note that a considerable number of these presumptive positives may in fact have been negative after confirmation by molecular methods. However, the presence of presumptive <i>E. coli</i> O157 at high levels is one reason that the prevention of offal contamination requires more stringent measures. Preventing offal contamination requires stricter measures during slaughter procedures to ensure safety, reduce food losses, and enhance sustainability in meat production.</p>","PeriodicalId":23694,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Sciences","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11861329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainable Practices and Microbial Quality of Cattle Offal in Slaughterhouses.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Raquel Cândido, Kamila Soares, Márcio Moura-Alves, Cristina Saraiva, Alexandra Esteves\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/vetsci12020153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As global income levels and population increase, meat consumption and production are rising, raising concerns about climate change, animal welfare, and environmental sustainability. Offal offers a sustainable, nutrient-rich, and economical alternative to muscle meat, providing proteins, vitamins, and minerals. This study was triggered by the scarcity of information on the microbiological quality of edible bovine offal, which is often associated with poor hygienic conditions during handling and processing at slaughterhouse. This study assessed the superficial microbiota present on cattle liver and tongue in a vertical slaughterhouse across various stages of the procurement process and on days with different slaughter volumes, with three sampling points: immediately after post-mortem inspection (Point 1); after the arrival of the viscera in the preparation room (Point 2); and in the refrigeration chamber at 3 °C (Point 3). Samples were analysed according to ISO methods for enumeration of mesophilic aerobic bacteria, <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i>, generic <i>Escherichia coli</i>, presumptive <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157, and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and detection of presumptive <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, and <i>Salmonella</i> spp. Microbiological counts were within the acceptability values stipulated in the amendment of Regulation EC 1441/2007 to Regulation EC 2073/2005 for cattle carcasses. In general, both viscera showed higher microbial counts on days with higher slaughter volumes, with the exception of <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> and <i>Staphylococcus</i> counts on the tongue. There was also an increase in microorganism levels across the offal processing stages. Out of 144 samples, 20.83% were contaminated with presumptive <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157, 3.47% <i>Salmonella</i> spp., and 25% <i>S. aureus</i>. Therefore, although 20.83% of the samples tested were presumptive for <i>E. coli</i> O157, it is important to note that a considerable number of these presumptive positives may in fact have been negative after confirmation by molecular methods. However, the presence of presumptive <i>E. coli</i> O157 at high levels is one reason that the prevention of offal contamination requires more stringent measures. Preventing offal contamination requires stricter measures during slaughter procedures to ensure safety, reduce food losses, and enhance sustainability in meat production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Sciences\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11861329/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12020153\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci12020153","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球收入水平和人口的增加,肉类消费和生产不断增加,引发了人们对气候变化、动物福利和环境可持续性的担忧。内脏提供了一种可持续的、营养丰富的、经济的肌肉肉替代品,提供蛋白质、维生素和矿物质。这项研究是由于缺乏关于可食用牛内脏微生物质量的信息而引发的,这通常与屠宰场处理和加工过程中的卫生条件差有关。本研究评估了垂直屠宰场在采购过程的各个阶段和不同屠宰量的天数中牛肝脏和舌头上的浅表微生物群,有三个采样点:死后立即检查(点1);脏器到达制剂室后(第2点);并在3°C(点3)的冷冻室中对样品进行分析。根据ISO方法对中温嗜氧需氧细菌、肠杆菌科、通用大肠杆菌、推定大肠杆菌O157和金黄色葡萄球菌进行计数,并对推定大肠杆菌O157、金黄色葡萄球菌、和沙门氏菌。牛尸体的微生物计数在规例EC 1441/2007修订至规例EC 2073/2005所规定的可接受值范围内。总的来说,除了舌头上的肠杆菌科和葡萄球菌计数外,两种脏器在屠宰量较高的日子里都显示出较高的微生物计数。在整个内脏加工阶段,微生物水平也有所增加。144份样本中,20.83%被推定为大肠杆菌O157, 3.47%被沙门氏菌感染,25%被金黄色葡萄球菌感染。因此,尽管20.83%的检测样本被推定为大肠杆菌O157,但重要的是要注意,在分子方法确认后,相当多的这些推定阳性可能实际上是阴性的。然而,假定存在高水平的大肠杆菌O157是预防内脏污染需要更严格措施的原因之一。防止内脏污染需要在屠宰过程中采取更严格的措施,以确保安全,减少食物损失,并提高肉类生产的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainable Practices and Microbial Quality of Cattle Offal in Slaughterhouses.

As global income levels and population increase, meat consumption and production are rising, raising concerns about climate change, animal welfare, and environmental sustainability. Offal offers a sustainable, nutrient-rich, and economical alternative to muscle meat, providing proteins, vitamins, and minerals. This study was triggered by the scarcity of information on the microbiological quality of edible bovine offal, which is often associated with poor hygienic conditions during handling and processing at slaughterhouse. This study assessed the superficial microbiota present on cattle liver and tongue in a vertical slaughterhouse across various stages of the procurement process and on days with different slaughter volumes, with three sampling points: immediately after post-mortem inspection (Point 1); after the arrival of the viscera in the preparation room (Point 2); and in the refrigeration chamber at 3 °C (Point 3). Samples were analysed according to ISO methods for enumeration of mesophilic aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, generic Escherichia coli, presumptive Escherichia coli O157, and Staphylococcus aureus and detection of presumptive Escherichia coli O157, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella spp. Microbiological counts were within the acceptability values stipulated in the amendment of Regulation EC 1441/2007 to Regulation EC 2073/2005 for cattle carcasses. In general, both viscera showed higher microbial counts on days with higher slaughter volumes, with the exception of Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus counts on the tongue. There was also an increase in microorganism levels across the offal processing stages. Out of 144 samples, 20.83% were contaminated with presumptive Escherichia coli O157, 3.47% Salmonella spp., and 25% S. aureus. Therefore, although 20.83% of the samples tested were presumptive for E. coli O157, it is important to note that a considerable number of these presumptive positives may in fact have been negative after confirmation by molecular methods. However, the presence of presumptive E. coli O157 at high levels is one reason that the prevention of offal contamination requires more stringent measures. Preventing offal contamination requires stricter measures during slaughter procedures to ensure safety, reduce food losses, and enhance sustainability in meat production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Sciences
Veterinary Sciences VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
612
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Sciences is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original that are relevant to any field of veterinary sciences, including prevention, diagnosis and treatment of disease, disorder and injury in animals. This journal covers almost all topics related to animal health and veterinary medicine. Research fields of interest include but are not limited to: anaesthesiology anatomy bacteriology biochemistry cardiology dentistry dermatology embryology endocrinology epidemiology genetics histology immunology microbiology molecular biology mycology neurobiology oncology ophthalmology parasitology pathology pharmacology physiology radiology surgery theriogenology toxicology virology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信