加强跨文化器官捐献请求的沟通策略:文献综述。

Q2 Social Sciences
Margot Phillips, Áine Lorié, Tess Lauricella, Arabella S Begin, Helen Riess
{"title":"加强跨文化器官捐献请求的沟通策略:文献综述。","authors":"Margot Phillips, Áine Lorié, Tess Lauricella, Arabella S Begin, Helen Riess","doi":"10.1080/17538068.2025.2462424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Requesting consent for deceased organ donation is a uniquely challenging communication that has profound consequences at the individual and population level. Communication between requesters and family decision-makers who come from different cultures must be better understood. This review aims to identify communication variables that influence consent for organ donation in cross-cultural requests, with a goal of enhancing end-of - life experiences for families and increasing access to life-saving transplants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a MEDLINE search of English language studies from 1996-September 2022. Inclusion criteria required that studies examine in-person requests for deceased organ donation and include both cross-cultural and interpersonal factors in the study analysis. 427 titles and abstracts were assessed by author-pairs, followed by 46 full text reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Study locations included the United States (5), Israel (2), and Australia (2). Communication variables were grouped into three domains: pre-request, family approach, and request. The main outcome was likelihood of family authorization. Foreign birth and language and high religiosity were associated with lower likelihood of family approach and consent. Interpreter use was negatively associated with authorization, as was lower family satisfaction of interactions with medical staff. Perceptions of family willingness to donate and communication practices of requesters differed by family race. Family ratings of requester communication skills were less favorable in racially discordant requests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A small number of international quantitative studies assess the effect of cross-cultural communication on organ donation requests. Findings indicate a significant impact on the experience of family decision-makers and suggest an overall negative association with consent. Strategies to alleviate barriers to communication in cross-cultural requests are suggested along with areas for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":38052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communication strategies to enhance organ donation requests across cultures: a review of the literature.\",\"authors\":\"Margot Phillips, Áine Lorié, Tess Lauricella, Arabella S Begin, Helen Riess\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17538068.2025.2462424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Requesting consent for deceased organ donation is a uniquely challenging communication that has profound consequences at the individual and population level. Communication between requesters and family decision-makers who come from different cultures must be better understood. This review aims to identify communication variables that influence consent for organ donation in cross-cultural requests, with a goal of enhancing end-of - life experiences for families and increasing access to life-saving transplants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a MEDLINE search of English language studies from 1996-September 2022. Inclusion criteria required that studies examine in-person requests for deceased organ donation and include both cross-cultural and interpersonal factors in the study analysis. 427 titles and abstracts were assessed by author-pairs, followed by 46 full text reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Study locations included the United States (5), Israel (2), and Australia (2). Communication variables were grouped into three domains: pre-request, family approach, and request. The main outcome was likelihood of family authorization. Foreign birth and language and high religiosity were associated with lower likelihood of family approach and consent. Interpreter use was negatively associated with authorization, as was lower family satisfaction of interactions with medical staff. Perceptions of family willingness to donate and communication practices of requesters differed by family race. Family ratings of requester communication skills were less favorable in racially discordant requests.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A small number of international quantitative studies assess the effect of cross-cultural communication on organ donation requests. Findings indicate a significant impact on the experience of family decision-makers and suggest an overall negative association with consent. Strategies to alleviate barriers to communication in cross-cultural requests are suggested along with areas for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communication in Healthcare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communication in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2025.2462424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2025.2462424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:请求死者器官捐献的同意是一个独特的具有挑战性的沟通,在个人和人群层面具有深远的影响。来自不同文化背景的请求者和家庭决策者之间的沟通必须得到更好的理解。本综述旨在确定在跨文化请求中影响器官捐赠同意的交流变量,目的是提高家庭的临终体验,增加获得挽救生命的移植的机会。方法:我们对1996年至2022年9月期间的英语语言研究进行了MEDLINE检索。纳入标准要求研究检查死者器官捐赠的亲自请求,并在研究分析中包括跨文化和人际因素。作者对427篇标题和摘要进行了评估,随后进行了46篇全文综述。结果:9项研究符合纳入标准。研究地点包括美国(5)、以色列(2)和澳大利亚(2)。交流变量分为三个领域:预先请求、家庭方式和请求。主要结果是家庭授权的可能性。外国出生、语言和高度的宗教信仰与家庭接触和同意的可能性较低有关。口译员的使用与授权呈负相关,与医务人员互动的家庭满意度较低。家庭种族对家庭捐赠意愿的认知和请求者的沟通方式存在差异。在种族不一致的请求中,家庭对请求者沟通技巧的评分不太有利。结论:少数国际定量研究评估了跨文化交流对器官捐赠请求的影响。调查结果表明,对家庭决策者的经验有重大影响,并表明与同意的总体负相关。提出了减轻跨文化请求中沟通障碍的策略以及未来研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communication strategies to enhance organ donation requests across cultures: a review of the literature.

Background: Requesting consent for deceased organ donation is a uniquely challenging communication that has profound consequences at the individual and population level. Communication between requesters and family decision-makers who come from different cultures must be better understood. This review aims to identify communication variables that influence consent for organ donation in cross-cultural requests, with a goal of enhancing end-of - life experiences for families and increasing access to life-saving transplants.

Methods: We conducted a MEDLINE search of English language studies from 1996-September 2022. Inclusion criteria required that studies examine in-person requests for deceased organ donation and include both cross-cultural and interpersonal factors in the study analysis. 427 titles and abstracts were assessed by author-pairs, followed by 46 full text reviews.

Results: Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Study locations included the United States (5), Israel (2), and Australia (2). Communication variables were grouped into three domains: pre-request, family approach, and request. The main outcome was likelihood of family authorization. Foreign birth and language and high religiosity were associated with lower likelihood of family approach and consent. Interpreter use was negatively associated with authorization, as was lower family satisfaction of interactions with medical staff. Perceptions of family willingness to donate and communication practices of requesters differed by family race. Family ratings of requester communication skills were less favorable in racially discordant requests.

Conclusions: A small number of international quantitative studies assess the effect of cross-cultural communication on organ donation requests. Findings indicate a significant impact on the experience of family decision-makers and suggest an overall negative association with consent. Strategies to alleviate barriers to communication in cross-cultural requests are suggested along with areas for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication in Healthcare
Journal of Communication in Healthcare Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信