土耳其版脊髓独立测量(SCIM III)自我报告的效度和信度。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spinal cord Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1038/s41393-025-01069-x
Yelda Soluk Özdemir, Cansın Medin Ceylan, Nurdan Paker, Veysel Korkut, Burak Kütük, Kadriye Öneş, Derya Buğdaycı, Fatma N Kesiktaş
{"title":"土耳其版脊髓独立测量(SCIM III)自我报告的效度和信度。","authors":"Yelda Soluk Özdemir, Cansın Medin Ceylan, Nurdan Paker, Veysel Korkut, Burak Kütük, Kadriye Öneş, Derya Buğdaycı, Fatma N Kesiktaş","doi":"10.1038/s41393-025-01069-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional validation study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to create a Turkish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report (SCIM-SR) scale and verify its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rehabilitation Department at Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Training Research Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Turkish version of SCIM-SR was translated from English using forward and backward translation in accordance with standard guidelines and 90 participants completed the SCIM-SR Turkish form. At the same time, a Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) was administered to the participants by a health professional through observation. Cronbach's alpha, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the internal consistency and concurrent validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's α coefficients for the total scale was 0.883. For the subscales, it was 0.929 for self-care, 0.571 for respiration and sphincter management and 0.885 for mobility. Test-retest reliability after two weeks yielded Spearman coefficients above 0.92 for the total scale and all subscales. When analyzing the correlation between SCIM-SR and SCIM III, the intraclass correlation average and its lower and upper bound values were as follows: 0.984 (0.976-0.990) for self-care; 0.970 (0.955-0.980) for respiration and sphincter management; 0.968 (0.951-0.979) for mobility and 0.980 (0.969-0.987) for the total. There was good agreement between SCIM-SR and SCIM III when evaluating the total score in Bland-Altman graphs. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant proportional bias (0.76; 95% CI [-21.34, 22.87]), but a significant fixed bias was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Turkish version of SCIM-SR demonstrated excellent internal consistency and good validity in Turkish individuals with spinal cord injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":" ","pages":"222-226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) self-report.\",\"authors\":\"Yelda Soluk Özdemir, Cansın Medin Ceylan, Nurdan Paker, Veysel Korkut, Burak Kütük, Kadriye Öneş, Derya Buğdaycı, Fatma N Kesiktaş\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41393-025-01069-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross-sectional validation study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to create a Turkish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report (SCIM-SR) scale and verify its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Rehabilitation Department at Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Training Research Hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Turkish version of SCIM-SR was translated from English using forward and backward translation in accordance with standard guidelines and 90 participants completed the SCIM-SR Turkish form. At the same time, a Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) was administered to the participants by a health professional through observation. Cronbach's alpha, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the internal consistency and concurrent validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's α coefficients for the total scale was 0.883. For the subscales, it was 0.929 for self-care, 0.571 for respiration and sphincter management and 0.885 for mobility. Test-retest reliability after two weeks yielded Spearman coefficients above 0.92 for the total scale and all subscales. When analyzing the correlation between SCIM-SR and SCIM III, the intraclass correlation average and its lower and upper bound values were as follows: 0.984 (0.976-0.990) for self-care; 0.970 (0.955-0.980) for respiration and sphincter management; 0.968 (0.951-0.979) for mobility and 0.980 (0.969-0.987) for the total. There was good agreement between SCIM-SR and SCIM III when evaluating the total score in Bland-Altman graphs. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant proportional bias (0.76; 95% CI [-21.34, 22.87]), but a significant fixed bias was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Turkish version of SCIM-SR demonstrated excellent internal consistency and good validity in Turkish individuals with spinal cord injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spinal cord\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"222-226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spinal cord\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-025-01069-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-025-01069-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:横断面验证研究。目的:本研究的目的是创建一个土耳其版本的脊髓独立性测量自我报告(sci - sr)量表,并验证其效度和信度。地点:伊斯坦布尔物理医学和康复与训练研究医院康复部。方法:根据标准指南,采用正译和反译的方法将英文SCIM-SR的土耳其语版本进行翻译,90名参与者完成SCIM-SR土耳其语表格。同时,由健康专业人员通过观察对参与者进行脊髓独立性测量III (SCIM III)。采用Cronbach’s alpha、Pearson和Spearman相关系数评价内部一致性和并发效度。结果:总量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.883。各分量表中,自我护理得分为0.929,呼吸和括约肌管理得分为0.571,活动能力得分为0.885。两周后的重测信度结果显示,总量表和所有子量表的Spearman系数均在0.92以上。在分析SCIM- sr与SCIM- III的相关性时,类内相关平均值及其上下界值分别为:自我护理为0.984 (0.976 ~ 0.990);呼吸和括约肌管理评分0.970 (0.955-0.980);流动性为0.968(0.951 ~ 0.979),总量为0.980(0.969 ~ 0.987)。在Bland-Altman图评价总分时,SCIM- sr与SCIM- III具有较好的一致性。Bland-Altman分析显示没有显著的比例偏倚(0.76;95% CI[-21.34, 22.87]),但观察到显著的固定偏倚。结论:土耳其版SCIM-SR在土耳其脊髓损伤患者中表现出优异的内部一致性和良好的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) self-report.

Study design: A cross-sectional validation study.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to create a Turkish version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Report (SCIM-SR) scale and verify its validity and reliability.

Setting: Rehabilitation Department at Istanbul Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Training Research Hospital.

Methods: The Turkish version of SCIM-SR was translated from English using forward and backward translation in accordance with standard guidelines and 90 participants completed the SCIM-SR Turkish form. At the same time, a Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) was administered to the participants by a health professional through observation. Cronbach's alpha, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the internal consistency and concurrent validity.

Results: The Cronbach's α coefficients for the total scale was 0.883. For the subscales, it was 0.929 for self-care, 0.571 for respiration and sphincter management and 0.885 for mobility. Test-retest reliability after two weeks yielded Spearman coefficients above 0.92 for the total scale and all subscales. When analyzing the correlation between SCIM-SR and SCIM III, the intraclass correlation average and its lower and upper bound values were as follows: 0.984 (0.976-0.990) for self-care; 0.970 (0.955-0.980) for respiration and sphincter management; 0.968 (0.951-0.979) for mobility and 0.980 (0.969-0.987) for the total. There was good agreement between SCIM-SR and SCIM III when evaluating the total score in Bland-Altman graphs. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed no significant proportional bias (0.76; 95% CI [-21.34, 22.87]), but a significant fixed bias was observed.

Conclusions: The Turkish version of SCIM-SR demonstrated excellent internal consistency and good validity in Turkish individuals with spinal cord injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spinal cord
Spinal cord 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
142
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews. Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信