{"title":"修复界面结构对复合材料层压板疤痕修复机械性能的影响","authors":"Kaomin Zhang, Zhenhu Miao, Haiting Xia, Xiaoyu Yang, Fenglin Tian, Yinghui Zhao","doi":"10.3390/polym17040511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The structural damage repair of composite material is an important issue that needs to be addressed during the service life of composite materials. To investigate the effects of a scarf structure and scarf angle on the repair quality of composite material, this paper proposes a mixed-scarf (MS) repair structure that combines ramped-scarf (RS) and stepped-scarf (SS) repair structures. The effect of the repair structure on the mechanical properties was analyzed, as well as the quality of the adhesive interface. The results show that at a scarf angle of 10°, the repair efficiency and the quality of adhesive interface are better than that of scarf angles of 20° and 30°. At a scarf angle of 10°, the recovery degree of the flexural strength of the MS repair structure is 79.72%, which is 6.77% and 38.24% higher than that of the RS and SS repair structures, respectively. However, in terms of flexural modulus, regardless of repair structure, the flexural modulus is highest at a scarf angle of 20°. Furthermore, the impact strength of the MS repair structure is approximately 87.60% that of the RS repair structure; additionally, it exhibits an increase of 45.83% compared to the SS repair structure. Overall, the quality of the adhesive interface for the RS and MS repair structures is similar and better than that of the SS repair structure. In conclusion, the MS repair structure is well suited for small-angle scarf repairs, whereas the RS repair structure is more appropriate for large-angle repairs; in contrast, the SS repair structure demonstrates the least effective performance in terms of repair outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20416,"journal":{"name":"Polymers","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Repair Interface Structure on Mechanical Properties of Scarf Repair for Composite Laminate Plates.\",\"authors\":\"Kaomin Zhang, Zhenhu Miao, Haiting Xia, Xiaoyu Yang, Fenglin Tian, Yinghui Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/polym17040511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The structural damage repair of composite material is an important issue that needs to be addressed during the service life of composite materials. To investigate the effects of a scarf structure and scarf angle on the repair quality of composite material, this paper proposes a mixed-scarf (MS) repair structure that combines ramped-scarf (RS) and stepped-scarf (SS) repair structures. The effect of the repair structure on the mechanical properties was analyzed, as well as the quality of the adhesive interface. The results show that at a scarf angle of 10°, the repair efficiency and the quality of adhesive interface are better than that of scarf angles of 20° and 30°. At a scarf angle of 10°, the recovery degree of the flexural strength of the MS repair structure is 79.72%, which is 6.77% and 38.24% higher than that of the RS and SS repair structures, respectively. However, in terms of flexural modulus, regardless of repair structure, the flexural modulus is highest at a scarf angle of 20°. Furthermore, the impact strength of the MS repair structure is approximately 87.60% that of the RS repair structure; additionally, it exhibits an increase of 45.83% compared to the SS repair structure. Overall, the quality of the adhesive interface for the RS and MS repair structures is similar and better than that of the SS repair structure. In conclusion, the MS repair structure is well suited for small-angle scarf repairs, whereas the RS repair structure is more appropriate for large-angle repairs; in contrast, the SS repair structure demonstrates the least effective performance in terms of repair outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polymers\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858822/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polymers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17040511\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLYMER SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polymers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17040511","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Repair Interface Structure on Mechanical Properties of Scarf Repair for Composite Laminate Plates.
The structural damage repair of composite material is an important issue that needs to be addressed during the service life of composite materials. To investigate the effects of a scarf structure and scarf angle on the repair quality of composite material, this paper proposes a mixed-scarf (MS) repair structure that combines ramped-scarf (RS) and stepped-scarf (SS) repair structures. The effect of the repair structure on the mechanical properties was analyzed, as well as the quality of the adhesive interface. The results show that at a scarf angle of 10°, the repair efficiency and the quality of adhesive interface are better than that of scarf angles of 20° and 30°. At a scarf angle of 10°, the recovery degree of the flexural strength of the MS repair structure is 79.72%, which is 6.77% and 38.24% higher than that of the RS and SS repair structures, respectively. However, in terms of flexural modulus, regardless of repair structure, the flexural modulus is highest at a scarf angle of 20°. Furthermore, the impact strength of the MS repair structure is approximately 87.60% that of the RS repair structure; additionally, it exhibits an increase of 45.83% compared to the SS repair structure. Overall, the quality of the adhesive interface for the RS and MS repair structures is similar and better than that of the SS repair structure. In conclusion, the MS repair structure is well suited for small-angle scarf repairs, whereas the RS repair structure is more appropriate for large-angle repairs; in contrast, the SS repair structure demonstrates the least effective performance in terms of repair outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Polymers (ISSN 2073-4360) is an international, open access journal of polymer science. It publishes research papers, short communications and review papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Polymers provides an interdisciplinary forum for publishing papers which advance the fields of (i) polymerization methods, (ii) theory, simulation, and modeling, (iii) understanding of new physical phenomena, (iv) advances in characterization techniques, and (v) harnessing of self-assembly and biological strategies for producing complex multifunctional structures.