用于柔性结构法向模态分析的最基本时域输入输出系统识别方法的数值和实验研究》(A Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Most Fundamental Time-Domain Input-Output System Identification Methods for the Normal Modal Analysis of Flexible Structures)。

IF 3.4 3区 综合性期刊 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Sensors Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.3390/s25041259
Şefika İpek Lök, Carmine Maria Pappalardo, Rosario La Regina, Domenico Guida
{"title":"用于柔性结构法向模态分析的最基本时域输入输出系统识别方法的数值和实验研究》(A Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Most Fundamental Time-Domain Input-Output System Identification Methods for the Normal Modal Analysis of Flexible Structures)。","authors":"Şefika İpek Lök, Carmine Maria Pappalardo, Rosario La Regina, Domenico Guida","doi":"10.3390/s25041259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper deals with developing a comparative study of the principal time-domain system identification methods suitable for performing an experimental modal analysis of structural systems. To this end, this work focuses first on analyzing and reviewing the mathematical background concerning the analytical methods and the computational algorithms of interest for this study. The methods considered in the paper are referred to as the AutoRegressive eXogenous (ARX) method, the State-Space ESTimation (SSEST) method, the Numerical Algorithm for Subspace State-Space System Identification (N4SID), the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm (ERA) combined with the Observer/Kalman Filter Identification (OKID) method, and the Transfer Function ESTimation (TFEST) method. Starting from the identified models estimated through the methodologies reported in the paper, a set of second-order configuration-space dynamical models of the structural system of interest can also be determined by employing an estimation method for the Mass, Stiffness, and Damping (MSD) matrices. Furthermore, in practical applications, the correct estimation of the damping matrix is severely hampered by noise that corrupts the input and output measurements. To address this problem, in this paper, the identification of the damping matrix is improved by employing the Proportional Damping Coefficient (PDC) identification method, which is based on the use of the identified set of natural frequencies and damping ratios found for the case study analyzed in the paper. This work also revisits the critical aspects and pitfalls related to using the Model Order Reduction (MOR) approach combined with the Balanced Truncation Method (BTM) to reduce the dimensions of the identified state-space models. Finally, this work analyzes the performance of all the fundamental system identification methods mentioned before when applied to the experimental modal analysis of flexible structures. This is achieved by carrying out an experimental campaign based on the use of a vibrating test rig, which serves as a demonstrative example of a typical structural system. The complete set of experimental results found in this investigation is reported in the appendix of the paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":21698,"journal":{"name":"Sensors","volume":"25 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11860405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Most Fundamental Time-Domain Input-Output System Identification Methods for the Normal Modal Analysis of Flexible Structures.\",\"authors\":\"Şefika İpek Lök, Carmine Maria Pappalardo, Rosario La Regina, Domenico Guida\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/s25041259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper deals with developing a comparative study of the principal time-domain system identification methods suitable for performing an experimental modal analysis of structural systems. To this end, this work focuses first on analyzing and reviewing the mathematical background concerning the analytical methods and the computational algorithms of interest for this study. The methods considered in the paper are referred to as the AutoRegressive eXogenous (ARX) method, the State-Space ESTimation (SSEST) method, the Numerical Algorithm for Subspace State-Space System Identification (N4SID), the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm (ERA) combined with the Observer/Kalman Filter Identification (OKID) method, and the Transfer Function ESTimation (TFEST) method. Starting from the identified models estimated through the methodologies reported in the paper, a set of second-order configuration-space dynamical models of the structural system of interest can also be determined by employing an estimation method for the Mass, Stiffness, and Damping (MSD) matrices. Furthermore, in practical applications, the correct estimation of the damping matrix is severely hampered by noise that corrupts the input and output measurements. To address this problem, in this paper, the identification of the damping matrix is improved by employing the Proportional Damping Coefficient (PDC) identification method, which is based on the use of the identified set of natural frequencies and damping ratios found for the case study analyzed in the paper. This work also revisits the critical aspects and pitfalls related to using the Model Order Reduction (MOR) approach combined with the Balanced Truncation Method (BTM) to reduce the dimensions of the identified state-space models. Finally, this work analyzes the performance of all the fundamental system identification methods mentioned before when applied to the experimental modal analysis of flexible structures. This is achieved by carrying out an experimental campaign based on the use of a vibrating test rig, which serves as a demonstrative example of a typical structural system. The complete set of experimental results found in this investigation is reported in the appendix of the paper.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sensors\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11860405/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sensors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/s25041259\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/s25041259","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Numerical and Experimental Investigation of the Most Fundamental Time-Domain Input-Output System Identification Methods for the Normal Modal Analysis of Flexible Structures.

This paper deals with developing a comparative study of the principal time-domain system identification methods suitable for performing an experimental modal analysis of structural systems. To this end, this work focuses first on analyzing and reviewing the mathematical background concerning the analytical methods and the computational algorithms of interest for this study. The methods considered in the paper are referred to as the AutoRegressive eXogenous (ARX) method, the State-Space ESTimation (SSEST) method, the Numerical Algorithm for Subspace State-Space System Identification (N4SID), the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm (ERA) combined with the Observer/Kalman Filter Identification (OKID) method, and the Transfer Function ESTimation (TFEST) method. Starting from the identified models estimated through the methodologies reported in the paper, a set of second-order configuration-space dynamical models of the structural system of interest can also be determined by employing an estimation method for the Mass, Stiffness, and Damping (MSD) matrices. Furthermore, in practical applications, the correct estimation of the damping matrix is severely hampered by noise that corrupts the input and output measurements. To address this problem, in this paper, the identification of the damping matrix is improved by employing the Proportional Damping Coefficient (PDC) identification method, which is based on the use of the identified set of natural frequencies and damping ratios found for the case study analyzed in the paper. This work also revisits the critical aspects and pitfalls related to using the Model Order Reduction (MOR) approach combined with the Balanced Truncation Method (BTM) to reduce the dimensions of the identified state-space models. Finally, this work analyzes the performance of all the fundamental system identification methods mentioned before when applied to the experimental modal analysis of flexible structures. This is achieved by carrying out an experimental campaign based on the use of a vibrating test rig, which serves as a demonstrative example of a typical structural system. The complete set of experimental results found in this investigation is reported in the appendix of the paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sensors
Sensors 工程技术-电化学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
8430
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Sensors (ISSN 1424-8220) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of sensors and biosensors. It publishes reviews (including comprehensive reviews on the complete sensors products), regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信