健康受试者对黑巧克力摄入的最大摄氧量反应:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Aref Mehdipour, Saber Saedmocheshi, Giuseppe Potrick Stefani, Ehsan Amiri, Diako Heidary
{"title":"健康受试者对黑巧克力摄入的最大摄氧量反应:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Aref Mehdipour, Saber Saedmocheshi, Giuseppe Potrick Stefani, Ehsan Amiri, Diako Heidary","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The potential role of dark chocolate (DC) in enhancing exercise performance remains underexplored. While DC has been associated with various health benefits, its specific impact on endurance performance, particularly VO<sub>2max</sub>, has not been conclusively established. This meta-analysis examined the effect of DC on VO<sub>2max</sub> in healthy individuals using PRISMA guidelines. Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 144 participants were included, with VO<sub>2max</sub> as the primary outcome. The meta-analysis revealed no significant effect of DC on VO<sub>2max</sub> (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.44, p = 0.36). Heterogeneity among the studies was low (Q-value = 3.34, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.00, p = 0.50), and sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings, as excluding individual studies did not alter the results (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.44, p = 0.36). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that DC consumption does not significantly improve VO<sub>2max</sub> in healthy individuals. Future research should explore the effects of DC on other aspects of exercise performance, as well as its long-term impact, to better understand its potential role in athletic and health-related outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 5","pages":"e70256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11859664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response of VO<sub>2max</sub> to dark chocolate consumption in healthy subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Aref Mehdipour, Saber Saedmocheshi, Giuseppe Potrick Stefani, Ehsan Amiri, Diako Heidary\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.70256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The potential role of dark chocolate (DC) in enhancing exercise performance remains underexplored. While DC has been associated with various health benefits, its specific impact on endurance performance, particularly VO<sub>2max</sub>, has not been conclusively established. This meta-analysis examined the effect of DC on VO<sub>2max</sub> in healthy individuals using PRISMA guidelines. Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 144 participants were included, with VO<sub>2max</sub> as the primary outcome. The meta-analysis revealed no significant effect of DC on VO<sub>2max</sub> (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.44, p = 0.36). Heterogeneity among the studies was low (Q-value = 3.34, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.00, p = 0.50), and sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings, as excluding individual studies did not alter the results (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.44, p = 0.36). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that DC consumption does not significantly improve VO<sub>2max</sub> in healthy individuals. Future research should explore the effects of DC on other aspects of exercise performance, as well as its long-term impact, to better understand its potential role in athletic and health-related outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"e70256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11859664/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70256\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黑巧克力(DC)在提高运动表现方面的潜在作用仍未得到充分探索。虽然DC与各种健康益处有关,但其对耐力表现,特别是最大摄氧量的具体影响尚未得到最终确定。本荟萃分析使用PRISMA指南检查了DC对健康个体VO2max的影响。根据纳入和排除标准,纳入5项随机对照试验(RCTs),共144名受试者,以最大摄氧量为主要指标。meta分析显示DC对VO2max无显著影响(SMD = 0.14, 95% CI: -0.16 ~ 0.44, p = 0.36)。研究之间的异质性较低(q值= 3.34,I2 = 0.00, p = 0.50),敏感性分析证实了研究结果的稳健性,因为排除个别研究并未改变结果(SMD = 0.14, 95% CI: -0.16至0.44,p = 0.36)。综上所述,本荟萃分析表明,摄入DC并不能显著提高健康个体的最大摄氧量。未来的研究应该探索DC对运动表现的其他方面的影响,以及它的长期影响,以更好地了解它在运动和健康相关结果中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Response of VO<sub>2max</sub> to dark chocolate consumption in healthy subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Response of VO<sub>2max</sub> to dark chocolate consumption in healthy subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Response of VO<sub>2max</sub> to dark chocolate consumption in healthy subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Response of VO2max to dark chocolate consumption in healthy subjects: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The potential role of dark chocolate (DC) in enhancing exercise performance remains underexplored. While DC has been associated with various health benefits, its specific impact on endurance performance, particularly VO2max, has not been conclusively established. This meta-analysis examined the effect of DC on VO2max in healthy individuals using PRISMA guidelines. Following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 144 participants were included, with VO2max as the primary outcome. The meta-analysis revealed no significant effect of DC on VO2max (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.44, p = 0.36). Heterogeneity among the studies was low (Q-value = 3.34, I2 = 0.00, p = 0.50), and sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings, as excluding individual studies did not alter the results (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.44, p = 0.36). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that DC consumption does not significantly improve VO2max in healthy individuals. Future research should explore the effects of DC on other aspects of exercise performance, as well as its long-term impact, to better understand its potential role in athletic and health-related outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信