{"title":"回顾性分析单独应用肉毒毒素与联合应用地尔硫卓的疗效。","authors":"Cigdem Arslan, Emre Karagoz, Tansu Altintas, Caglar Pekuz, Yasemin Yildirim, Mustafa Oncel","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-04823-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of botulinum toxin (BT) alone versus BT combined with topical diltiazem (TD) in the treatment of chronic anal fissures (CAF).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study is designed as a retrospective analysis, reviewing data from 1296 patients diagnosed with anal fissures who presented to our clinic between 2017 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single center (University hospital).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 217 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed, with 143 receiving BT alone and 74 receiving the combination of BT + TD.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>BT was administered as 100 IU injected into four quadrants. TD was applied twice daily for 10 days immediately following the BT injection.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome measures were fissure healing at 2 months and days to pain-free defecation. Secondary outcome measures were complete healing and recurrence rates at 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics and symptom duration between the BT and BT + TD groups. The median time to pain-free defecation was 7 days across the entire series, with no statistical difference between groups. At 2 months, complete healing was observed in 74.4% of patients, with no significant difference between groups: 74.8% for BT and 74.3% for BT + TD. During a median follow-up of 53 (22-101) months, a recurrence rate of 26.3% was observed, and TD showed no effect on complete healing and recurrence rates.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The most significant limitation of our study is its retrospective design and the absence of a placebo control for TD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrates that BT is an effective and safe treatment for CAF, with or without the addition of TD. The combination therapy did not show superior outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"40 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective analysis on the efficacy of botulinum toxin alone versus combined botulinum toxin and topical diltiazem.\",\"authors\":\"Cigdem Arslan, Emre Karagoz, Tansu Altintas, Caglar Pekuz, Yasemin Yildirim, Mustafa Oncel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00384-025-04823-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of botulinum toxin (BT) alone versus BT combined with topical diltiazem (TD) in the treatment of chronic anal fissures (CAF).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study is designed as a retrospective analysis, reviewing data from 1296 patients diagnosed with anal fissures who presented to our clinic between 2017 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single center (University hospital).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 217 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed, with 143 receiving BT alone and 74 receiving the combination of BT + TD.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>BT was administered as 100 IU injected into four quadrants. TD was applied twice daily for 10 days immediately following the BT injection.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome measures were fissure healing at 2 months and days to pain-free defecation. Secondary outcome measures were complete healing and recurrence rates at 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics and symptom duration between the BT and BT + TD groups. The median time to pain-free defecation was 7 days across the entire series, with no statistical difference between groups. At 2 months, complete healing was observed in 74.4% of patients, with no significant difference between groups: 74.8% for BT and 74.3% for BT + TD. During a median follow-up of 53 (22-101) months, a recurrence rate of 26.3% was observed, and TD showed no effect on complete healing and recurrence rates.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The most significant limitation of our study is its retrospective design and the absence of a placebo control for TD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrates that BT is an effective and safe treatment for CAF, with or without the addition of TD. The combination therapy did not show superior outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11865108/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04823-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04823-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Retrospective analysis on the efficacy of botulinum toxin alone versus combined botulinum toxin and topical diltiazem.
Objective: This study aims to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of botulinum toxin (BT) alone versus BT combined with topical diltiazem (TD) in the treatment of chronic anal fissures (CAF).
Design: The study is designed as a retrospective analysis, reviewing data from 1296 patients diagnosed with anal fissures who presented to our clinic between 2017 and 2022.
Setting: Single center (University hospital).
Patients: A total of 217 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed, with 143 receiving BT alone and 74 receiving the combination of BT + TD.
Interventions: BT was administered as 100 IU injected into four quadrants. TD was applied twice daily for 10 days immediately following the BT injection.
Main outcome measures: Primary outcome measures were fissure healing at 2 months and days to pain-free defecation. Secondary outcome measures were complete healing and recurrence rates at 24 months.
Results: There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics and symptom duration between the BT and BT + TD groups. The median time to pain-free defecation was 7 days across the entire series, with no statistical difference between groups. At 2 months, complete healing was observed in 74.4% of patients, with no significant difference between groups: 74.8% for BT and 74.3% for BT + TD. During a median follow-up of 53 (22-101) months, a recurrence rate of 26.3% was observed, and TD showed no effect on complete healing and recurrence rates.
Limitations: The most significant limitation of our study is its retrospective design and the absence of a placebo control for TD.
Conclusion: The study demonstrates that BT is an effective and safe treatment for CAF, with or without the addition of TD. The combination therapy did not show superior outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies.
The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.