非叮蚊幼期多样性及种界划分的COI研究(双翅目:手蛾科)。

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Insects Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.3390/insects16020174
Laurynas Stasiukynas, Jekaterina Havelka, Fabio Laurindo da Silva, Maria Fernanda Torres Jimenez, Sigitas Podėnas, Aistė Lekoveckaitė
{"title":"非叮蚊幼期多样性及种界划分的COI研究(双翅目:手蛾科)。","authors":"Laurynas Stasiukynas, Jekaterina Havelka, Fabio Laurindo da Silva, Maria Fernanda Torres Jimenez, Sigitas Podėnas, Aistė Lekoveckaitė","doi":"10.3390/insects16020174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diversity of non-biting midges (Chironomidae, Diptera) remains an unresolved topic, with estimates of species numbers ranging from 6000 to 15,000 according to various authors. To assess Chironomidae diversity in Lithuania, we evaluate the effectiveness of COI gene-based species delimitation methods for providing rapid diversity estimates. Nevertheless, differences between tree-based and distance-based approaches can result in varying group classifications, which may cause species numbers to be overestimated or underestimated. For our study, we analyzed a dataset of 109 specimens sampled from six Lithuanian streams. By applying multiple methods, such as Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP), Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD), the generalized mixed Yule-coalescent (GMYC) model, and the Bayesian implementation of the Poisson Tree Processes (bPTP) model, we found that species estimates ranged from 28 to 58. Among these methods, ASAP proved to be the most effective for our dataset, identifying 58 putative species. These results reinforce our assumption that the current understanding of Chironomidae species diversity is incomplete.</p>","PeriodicalId":13642,"journal":{"name":"Insects","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COI Insights into Diversity and Species Delimitation of Immature Stages of Non-Biting Midges (Diptera: Chironomidae).\",\"authors\":\"Laurynas Stasiukynas, Jekaterina Havelka, Fabio Laurindo da Silva, Maria Fernanda Torres Jimenez, Sigitas Podėnas, Aistė Lekoveckaitė\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/insects16020174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The diversity of non-biting midges (Chironomidae, Diptera) remains an unresolved topic, with estimates of species numbers ranging from 6000 to 15,000 according to various authors. To assess Chironomidae diversity in Lithuania, we evaluate the effectiveness of COI gene-based species delimitation methods for providing rapid diversity estimates. Nevertheless, differences between tree-based and distance-based approaches can result in varying group classifications, which may cause species numbers to be overestimated or underestimated. For our study, we analyzed a dataset of 109 specimens sampled from six Lithuanian streams. By applying multiple methods, such as Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP), Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD), the generalized mixed Yule-coalescent (GMYC) model, and the Bayesian implementation of the Poisson Tree Processes (bPTP) model, we found that species estimates ranged from 28 to 58. Among these methods, ASAP proved to be the most effective for our dataset, identifying 58 putative species. These results reinforce our assumption that the current understanding of Chironomidae species diversity is incomplete.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insects\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856256/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insects\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020174\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insects","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非叮蚊(摇蚊科,双翅目)的多样性仍然是一个未解决的话题,根据不同作者的估计,物种数量从6000到15000不等。为了评估立陶宛摇蚊科的多样性,我们评估了基于COI基因的物种划分方法的有效性,以提供快速的多样性估计。然而,基于树的方法和基于距离的方法之间的差异可能导致不同的类群分类,这可能导致物种数量被高估或低估。在我们的研究中,我们分析了来自立陶宛六条河流的109个标本的数据集。采用自动划分装配物种(ASAP)、自动条形码间隙发现(ABGD)、广义混合Yule-coalescent (GMYC)模型和泊松树过程(bPTP)贝叶斯实现模型等多种方法,我们发现物种估计范围在28 ~ 58之间。在这些方法中,ASAP对我们的数据集证明是最有效的,识别了58个假定的物种。这些结果加强了我们的假设,即目前对手摇蝇科物种多样性的认识是不完整的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COI Insights into Diversity and Species Delimitation of Immature Stages of Non-Biting Midges (Diptera: Chironomidae).

The diversity of non-biting midges (Chironomidae, Diptera) remains an unresolved topic, with estimates of species numbers ranging from 6000 to 15,000 according to various authors. To assess Chironomidae diversity in Lithuania, we evaluate the effectiveness of COI gene-based species delimitation methods for providing rapid diversity estimates. Nevertheless, differences between tree-based and distance-based approaches can result in varying group classifications, which may cause species numbers to be overestimated or underestimated. For our study, we analyzed a dataset of 109 specimens sampled from six Lithuanian streams. By applying multiple methods, such as Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP), Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD), the generalized mixed Yule-coalescent (GMYC) model, and the Bayesian implementation of the Poisson Tree Processes (bPTP) model, we found that species estimates ranged from 28 to 58. Among these methods, ASAP proved to be the most effective for our dataset, identifying 58 putative species. These results reinforce our assumption that the current understanding of Chironomidae species diversity is incomplete.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insects
Insects Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1013
审稿时长
21.77 days
期刊介绍: Insects (ISSN 2075-4450) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of entomology published by MDPI online quarterly. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications related to the biology, physiology and the behavior of insects and arthropods. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信