柚子香和刺叶蛾精油对白纹伊蚊(Skuse)的化学特征、感官特性和生物活性研究。

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Insects Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.3390/insects16020202
Prangthip Parichanon, Roberta Ascrizzi, Camilla Tani, Maria Cristina Echeverria, Sania Ortega Andrade, Hugo Paredes, Isabella Taglieri, Guido Flamini, Francesca Venturi, Barbara Conti
{"title":"柚子香和刺叶蛾精油对白纹伊蚊(Skuse)的化学特征、感官特性和生物活性研究。","authors":"Prangthip Parichanon, Roberta Ascrizzi, Camilla Tani, Maria Cristina Echeverria, Sania Ortega Andrade, Hugo Paredes, Isabella Taglieri, Guido Flamini, Francesca Venturi, Barbara Conti","doi":"10.3390/insects16020202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mosquito <i>Aedes albopictus</i> is a vector of several harmful viruses, necessitating the development of safer and more sustainable repellents than DEET. This study evaluated the potential of plant-based EOs extracted via steam distillation from <i>Aloysia citrodora</i> and <i>Bursera graveolens</i> plants harvested in Ecuador. <i>A. citrodora</i> EO exhibited a high sensory pleasantness with a citral-like aroma, while <i>B. graveolens</i> EO had lower sensory appeal due to off-flavors. At 200 µL L<sup>-1</sup>, <i>B. graveolens</i> EO demonstrated strong ovideterrent activity, reducing egg laying by 64%, whereas <i>A. citrodora</i> EO displayed the highest larvicidal activity with an LC<sub>50</sub> value of 88.54 µL L<sup>-1</sup>. Both EOs, applied at 0.20 µL cm<sup>-2</sup> on human skin, provided comparable repellency for over 45 min. The RD<sub>50</sub> values were 0.104 µL cm<sup>-2</sup> for <i>A. citrodora</i> EO and 0.136 µL cm<sup>-2</sup> for <i>B. graveolens</i> EO. When compared to DEET at 0.04 µL cm<sup>-2</sup>, no significant differences in repellency were observed within the first 15 min post-application. These findings suggest that both EOs are effective alternatives to synthetic repellents, and <i>A. citrodora</i> EO emerges as a promising candidate due to its superior sensory attributes and larvicidal activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":13642,"journal":{"name":"Insects","volume":"16 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11857052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemical Profiling, Sensory Qualities, and Bioactivities of Essential Oils Obtained from <i>Aloysia citrodora</i> and <i>Bursera graveolens</i> Ecuadorian Plants Against the Mosquito <i>Aedes albopictus</i> (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae).\",\"authors\":\"Prangthip Parichanon, Roberta Ascrizzi, Camilla Tani, Maria Cristina Echeverria, Sania Ortega Andrade, Hugo Paredes, Isabella Taglieri, Guido Flamini, Francesca Venturi, Barbara Conti\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/insects16020202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The mosquito <i>Aedes albopictus</i> is a vector of several harmful viruses, necessitating the development of safer and more sustainable repellents than DEET. This study evaluated the potential of plant-based EOs extracted via steam distillation from <i>Aloysia citrodora</i> and <i>Bursera graveolens</i> plants harvested in Ecuador. <i>A. citrodora</i> EO exhibited a high sensory pleasantness with a citral-like aroma, while <i>B. graveolens</i> EO had lower sensory appeal due to off-flavors. At 200 µL L<sup>-1</sup>, <i>B. graveolens</i> EO demonstrated strong ovideterrent activity, reducing egg laying by 64%, whereas <i>A. citrodora</i> EO displayed the highest larvicidal activity with an LC<sub>50</sub> value of 88.54 µL L<sup>-1</sup>. Both EOs, applied at 0.20 µL cm<sup>-2</sup> on human skin, provided comparable repellency for over 45 min. The RD<sub>50</sub> values were 0.104 µL cm<sup>-2</sup> for <i>A. citrodora</i> EO and 0.136 µL cm<sup>-2</sup> for <i>B. graveolens</i> EO. When compared to DEET at 0.04 µL cm<sup>-2</sup>, no significant differences in repellency were observed within the first 15 min post-application. These findings suggest that both EOs are effective alternatives to synthetic repellents, and <i>A. citrodora</i> EO emerges as a promising candidate due to its superior sensory attributes and larvicidal activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insects\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11857052/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insects\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020202\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insects","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16020202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

白纹伊蚊是几种有害病毒的载体,因此有必要开发比避蚊胺更安全、更可持续的驱蚊剂。本研究评估了通过蒸汽蒸馏法从厄瓜多尔收获的雪铁兰(Aloysia citrodora)和Bursera graveolens植物中提取植物基EOs的潜力。a . citrodora EO表现出较高的感官愉悦感,具有类似柠檬的香气,而B. graveolens EO由于味道难闻而表现出较低的感官吸引力。在200µL L-1浓度下,B. graveolens EO表现出较强的杀虫活性,产卵率降低64%,而A. citrodora EO的LC50值最高,为88.54µL L-1。两种精油均以0.20µL cm-2的浓度涂抹在人体皮肤上,可提供45分钟以上的相似驱避效果。香茅精油的RD50值分别为0.104µL cm-2和0.136µL cm-2。与0.04 μ L cm-2的避蚊胺相比,在施用后的前15分钟内,驱避效果没有显着差异。这些发现表明,这两种精油都是合成驱蚊剂的有效替代品,而香橼精油因其优越的感官特性和杀幼虫活性而成为有希望的候选产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chemical Profiling, Sensory Qualities, and Bioactivities of Essential Oils Obtained from Aloysia citrodora and Bursera graveolens Ecuadorian Plants Against the Mosquito Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae).

The mosquito Aedes albopictus is a vector of several harmful viruses, necessitating the development of safer and more sustainable repellents than DEET. This study evaluated the potential of plant-based EOs extracted via steam distillation from Aloysia citrodora and Bursera graveolens plants harvested in Ecuador. A. citrodora EO exhibited a high sensory pleasantness with a citral-like aroma, while B. graveolens EO had lower sensory appeal due to off-flavors. At 200 µL L-1, B. graveolens EO demonstrated strong ovideterrent activity, reducing egg laying by 64%, whereas A. citrodora EO displayed the highest larvicidal activity with an LC50 value of 88.54 µL L-1. Both EOs, applied at 0.20 µL cm-2 on human skin, provided comparable repellency for over 45 min. The RD50 values were 0.104 µL cm-2 for A. citrodora EO and 0.136 µL cm-2 for B. graveolens EO. When compared to DEET at 0.04 µL cm-2, no significant differences in repellency were observed within the first 15 min post-application. These findings suggest that both EOs are effective alternatives to synthetic repellents, and A. citrodora EO emerges as a promising candidate due to its superior sensory attributes and larvicidal activity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insects
Insects Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1013
审稿时长
21.77 days
期刊介绍: Insects (ISSN 2075-4450) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of entomology published by MDPI online quarterly. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications related to the biology, physiology and the behavior of insects and arthropods. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信