运动护齿器的使用是否影响唾液参数和口腔健康指标?系统回顾。

Q3 Dentistry
Mariana Pires da Costa, Nicolli de Araújo Meckelburg, Lucas Alves Jural, Andreia Vaz Braga Pintor, Guido Maranon-Vásquez, Tiago Braga Rabello, Marcela Baraúna Magno, Lucianne Cople Maia
{"title":"运动护齿器的使用是否影响唾液参数和口腔健康指标?系统回顾。","authors":"Mariana Pires da Costa, Nicolli de Araújo Meckelburg, Lucas Alves Jural, Andreia Vaz Braga Pintor, Guido Maranon-Vásquez, Tiago Braga Rabello, Marcela Baraúna Magno, Lucianne Cople Maia","doi":"10.1038/s41432-025-01129-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate whether the use of sports mouthguards (SMG) influences salivary parameters and oral health indices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic searches were conducted across six major databases and two sources of gray literature in July 2024, with no restrictions on language or publication date. Interventional studies assessing oral parameters in participants with and without SMG were included. Risk of bias (ROB) was evaluated using the NIH-NHLBI Quality Assessment Tools for before-and-after studies. Descriptive synthesis was performed, and the certainty of evidence was assessed with the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 202 male and female athletes aged 8 to 24 years. ROB ratings were classified as fair in three studies (75%) and poor in one study (25%). Evaluated salivary parameters included pH, stimulated and unstimulated flow rates, microbial count, saliva consistency, and buffering capacity. Additionally, oral indices such as full mouth plaque and bleeding scores were assessed. The studies demonstrated high heterogeneity in collection and analysis methods, outcome evaluation, and follow-up duration. Overall, the influence of SMG use on salivary pH (n = 4; 100%) and stimulated flow rate (n = 2; 100%) was inconclusive. SMG use did not affect microbial count (n = 2; 100%) or saliva consistency (n = 1; 100%) but was associated with a decrease in buffering capacity (n = 1; 100%). An increase was noted in unstimulated flow rate (n = 1; 100%) and oral indices (n = 1; 100%) with SMG use. The certainty of the evidence was rated as very low for all evaluated parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SMG use appears to impact saliva's buffering capacity but does not influence its consistency or microbial count. Despite the limited literature and methodological limitations of existing studies, this systematic review provides insights that could inform the design of more rigorous primary research, ultimately strengthening the evidence base on this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the use of sports mouthguards influence salivary parameters and oral health indices? A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Pires da Costa, Nicolli de Araújo Meckelburg, Lucas Alves Jural, Andreia Vaz Braga Pintor, Guido Maranon-Vásquez, Tiago Braga Rabello, Marcela Baraúna Magno, Lucianne Cople Maia\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41432-025-01129-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate whether the use of sports mouthguards (SMG) influences salivary parameters and oral health indices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic searches were conducted across six major databases and two sources of gray literature in July 2024, with no restrictions on language or publication date. Interventional studies assessing oral parameters in participants with and without SMG were included. Risk of bias (ROB) was evaluated using the NIH-NHLBI Quality Assessment Tools for before-and-after studies. Descriptive synthesis was performed, and the certainty of evidence was assessed with the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 202 male and female athletes aged 8 to 24 years. ROB ratings were classified as fair in three studies (75%) and poor in one study (25%). Evaluated salivary parameters included pH, stimulated and unstimulated flow rates, microbial count, saliva consistency, and buffering capacity. Additionally, oral indices such as full mouth plaque and bleeding scores were assessed. The studies demonstrated high heterogeneity in collection and analysis methods, outcome evaluation, and follow-up duration. Overall, the influence of SMG use on salivary pH (n = 4; 100%) and stimulated flow rate (n = 2; 100%) was inconclusive. SMG use did not affect microbial count (n = 2; 100%) or saliva consistency (n = 1; 100%) but was associated with a decrease in buffering capacity (n = 1; 100%). An increase was noted in unstimulated flow rate (n = 1; 100%) and oral indices (n = 1; 100%) with SMG use. The certainty of the evidence was rated as very low for all evaluated parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SMG use appears to impact saliva's buffering capacity but does not influence its consistency or microbial count. Despite the limited literature and methodological limitations of existing studies, this systematic review provides insights that could inform the design of more rigorous primary research, ultimately strengthening the evidence base on this topic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-025-01129-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-025-01129-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨运动护齿器(SMG)的使用对唾液参数及口腔健康指标的影响。方法:于2024年7月对6个主要数据库和2个灰色文献来源进行电子检索,不受语言和出版日期的限制。介入研究评估了有和没有SMG的参与者的口腔参数。使用NIH-NHLBI质量评估工具评估前后研究的偏倚风险(ROB)。进行描述性综合,并使用GRADE方法评估证据的确定性。结果:4项研究符合纳入标准,共包括202名8 ~ 24岁的男女运动员。3项研究(75%)的ROB评分为一般,1项研究(25%)为较差。评估的唾液参数包括pH值、受刺激和未受刺激的流速、微生物计数、唾液稠度和缓冲能力。此外,评估口腔指标,如满牙菌斑和出血评分。这些研究在收集和分析方法、结果评估和随访时间方面显示出高度的异质性。总体而言,使用SMG对唾液pH值的影响(n = 4;100%)和模拟流量(n = 2;100%)是不确定的。使用SMG不影响微生物计数(n = 2;100%)或唾液浓度(n = 1;100%),但与缓冲能力下降有关(n = 1;100%)。未刺激的流量增加(n = 1;100%)和口腔指标(n = 1;100%)使用SMG。在所有评估参数中,证据的确定性被评为非常低。结论:SMG的使用似乎会影响唾液的缓冲能力,但不会影响其稠度或微生物数量。尽管现有研究文献有限,方法也有局限性,但本系统综述提供了一些见解,可以为更严格的初步研究的设计提供信息,最终加强了该主题的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the use of sports mouthguards influence salivary parameters and oral health indices? A systematic review.

Aim: To investigate whether the use of sports mouthguards (SMG) influences salivary parameters and oral health indices.

Methods: Electronic searches were conducted across six major databases and two sources of gray literature in July 2024, with no restrictions on language or publication date. Interventional studies assessing oral parameters in participants with and without SMG were included. Risk of bias (ROB) was evaluated using the NIH-NHLBI Quality Assessment Tools for before-and-after studies. Descriptive synthesis was performed, and the certainty of evidence was assessed with the GRADE approach.

Results: Four studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 202 male and female athletes aged 8 to 24 years. ROB ratings were classified as fair in three studies (75%) and poor in one study (25%). Evaluated salivary parameters included pH, stimulated and unstimulated flow rates, microbial count, saliva consistency, and buffering capacity. Additionally, oral indices such as full mouth plaque and bleeding scores were assessed. The studies demonstrated high heterogeneity in collection and analysis methods, outcome evaluation, and follow-up duration. Overall, the influence of SMG use on salivary pH (n = 4; 100%) and stimulated flow rate (n = 2; 100%) was inconclusive. SMG use did not affect microbial count (n = 2; 100%) or saliva consistency (n = 1; 100%) but was associated with a decrease in buffering capacity (n = 1; 100%). An increase was noted in unstimulated flow rate (n = 1; 100%) and oral indices (n = 1; 100%) with SMG use. The certainty of the evidence was rated as very low for all evaluated parameters.

Conclusion: SMG use appears to impact saliva's buffering capacity but does not influence its consistency or microbial count. Despite the limited literature and methodological limitations of existing studies, this systematic review provides insights that could inform the design of more rigorous primary research, ultimately strengthening the evidence base on this topic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence-based dentistry
Evidence-based dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信