移动健康(mHealth)干预措施对2型糖尿病成人患者的糖尿病自我管理教育和支持——系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Anke Versluis, Anne Meike Boels, Maaike C. G. Huijden, Manon D. Mijnsbergen, Guy E. H. M. Rutten, Rimke C. Vos
{"title":"移动健康(mHealth)干预措施对2型糖尿病成人患者的糖尿病自我管理教育和支持——系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Anke Versluis,&nbsp;Anne Meike Boels,&nbsp;Maaike C. G. Huijden,&nbsp;Manon D. Mijnsbergen,&nbsp;Guy E. H. M. Rutten,&nbsp;Rimke C. Vos","doi":"10.1111/dme.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Diabetes self-management education (DSME) and support (DSME/S) delivered via mobile health (mHealth) is potentially cost-effective, if proven effective.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the effectiveness of DSME, DSMS or DSME/S delivered by mHealth interventions compared to usual care (UC) or attention placebo control (APC) in adults with type 2 diabetes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched (1) MEDLINE, (2) Embase, (3) PsycINFO, (4) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via the Cochrane Register of Studies Online, (5) ClinicalTrials.gov, and (6) World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from the year 2000 to January 31, 2023. We included RCTs comparing DSME/S delivered via mHealth versus UC or APC. Four authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Primary outcome was HbA1c, outher outcomes secundairy. Meta-analysed with random-effects model was used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 43 trials involving 9328 participants; sample sizes ranging from 20 to 1119. Pooled effects on HbA1c were for DSME: mean difference (MD) of −4 mmol/mol (−0.3%), 95% CI −6 mmol/mol (−0.6%) to −1 mmol/mol (−0.1); <i>p</i> = 0.002; DSMS MD −4 mmol/mol (−0.4%), 95% CI 7 mmol/mol (−0.6%) to −2 mmol/mol (−0.2); <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; and DSME/S MD of −2 mmol/mol (−0.2%) for HbA1c, 95% CI −3 mmol/mol (−0.3%) to −0 mmol/mol (−0.0%); <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001. We found uncertain effects on other outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>mHealth interventions delivering self management education with or without support to adults with type 2 diabetes appear to have a modest beneficial effect on HbA1c. Only a few trials investigated patient-reported outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11251,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Medicine","volume":"42 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dme.70002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diabetes self-management education and support delivered by mobile health (mHealth) interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes—A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Anke Versluis,&nbsp;Anne Meike Boels,&nbsp;Maaike C. G. Huijden,&nbsp;Manon D. Mijnsbergen,&nbsp;Guy E. H. M. Rutten,&nbsp;Rimke C. Vos\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dme.70002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Diabetes self-management education (DSME) and support (DSME/S) delivered via mobile health (mHealth) is potentially cost-effective, if proven effective.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the effectiveness of DSME, DSMS or DSME/S delivered by mHealth interventions compared to usual care (UC) or attention placebo control (APC) in adults with type 2 diabetes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We searched (1) MEDLINE, (2) Embase, (3) PsycINFO, (4) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via the Cochrane Register of Studies Online, (5) ClinicalTrials.gov, and (6) World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from the year 2000 to January 31, 2023. We included RCTs comparing DSME/S delivered via mHealth versus UC or APC. Four authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Primary outcome was HbA1c, outher outcomes secundairy. Meta-analysed with random-effects model was used.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included 43 trials involving 9328 participants; sample sizes ranging from 20 to 1119. Pooled effects on HbA1c were for DSME: mean difference (MD) of −4 mmol/mol (−0.3%), 95% CI −6 mmol/mol (−0.6%) to −1 mmol/mol (−0.1); <i>p</i> = 0.002; DSMS MD −4 mmol/mol (−0.4%), 95% CI 7 mmol/mol (−0.6%) to −2 mmol/mol (−0.2); <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; and DSME/S MD of −2 mmol/mol (−0.2%) for HbA1c, 95% CI −3 mmol/mol (−0.3%) to −0 mmol/mol (−0.0%); <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001. We found uncertain effects on other outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>mHealth interventions delivering self management education with or without support to adults with type 2 diabetes appear to have a modest beneficial effect on HbA1c. Only a few trials investigated patient-reported outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"42 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dme.70002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.70002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.70002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:通过移动医疗(mHealth)提供的糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)和支持(DSME/S)如果被证明有效,可能具有成本效益。目的:评估与常规护理(UC)或注意安慰剂对照(APC)相比,移动健康干预提供的DSME、DSMS或DSME/S在成人2型糖尿病患者中的有效性。方法:我们检索了(1)MEDLINE, (2) Embase, (3) PsycINFO, (4) Cochrane中央对照试验注册库,通过Cochrane在线研究注册库,(5)ClinicalTrials.gov,(6)世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台从2000年到2023年1月31日。我们纳入了比较通过移动医疗与UC或APC提供的DSME/S的随机对照试验。四位作者独立选择试验,评估偏倚风险并提取数据。主要指标为HbA1c,其他指标为次要指标。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。结果:我们纳入了43项试验,涉及9328名受试者;样本量从20到1119不等。DSME对HbA1c的综合影响为:平均差异(MD)为-4 mmol/mol (-0.3%), 95% CI为-6 mmol/mol(-0.6%)至-1 mmol/mol (-0.1);p = 0.002;dsm MD 4更易与摩尔(-0.4%),95% CI 7更易与摩尔(-0.6%)2更易与摩尔(-0.2);p结论:移动健康干预向2型糖尿病成人患者提供自我管理教育,有或没有支持,似乎对HbA1c有适度的有益影响。只有少数试验调查了患者报告的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diabetes self-management education and support delivered by mobile health (mHealth) interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes—A systematic review and meta-analysis

Diabetes self-management education and support delivered by mobile health (mHealth) interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes—A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Diabetes self-management education (DSME) and support (DSME/S) delivered via mobile health (mHealth) is potentially cost-effective, if proven effective.

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of DSME, DSMS or DSME/S delivered by mHealth interventions compared to usual care (UC) or attention placebo control (APC) in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

We searched (1) MEDLINE, (2) Embase, (3) PsycINFO, (4) Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials via the Cochrane Register of Studies Online, (5) ClinicalTrials.gov, and (6) World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from the year 2000 to January 31, 2023. We included RCTs comparing DSME/S delivered via mHealth versus UC or APC. Four authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Primary outcome was HbA1c, outher outcomes secundairy. Meta-analysed with random-effects model was used.

Results

We included 43 trials involving 9328 participants; sample sizes ranging from 20 to 1119. Pooled effects on HbA1c were for DSME: mean difference (MD) of −4 mmol/mol (−0.3%), 95% CI −6 mmol/mol (−0.6%) to −1 mmol/mol (−0.1); p = 0.002; DSMS MD −4 mmol/mol (−0.4%), 95% CI 7 mmol/mol (−0.6%) to −2 mmol/mol (−0.2); p < 0.001; and DSME/S MD of −2 mmol/mol (−0.2%) for HbA1c, 95% CI −3 mmol/mol (−0.3%) to −0 mmol/mol (−0.0%); p < 0.001. We found uncertain effects on other outcomes.

Conclusions

mHealth interventions delivering self management education with or without support to adults with type 2 diabetes appear to have a modest beneficial effect on HbA1c. Only a few trials investigated patient-reported outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetic Medicine
Diabetic Medicine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
229
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetic Medicine, the official journal of Diabetes UK, is published monthly simultaneously, in print and online editions. The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans. Categories of publication include research articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence. All material is peer-reviewed. We aim to disseminate knowledge about diabetes research with the goal of improving the management of people with diabetes. The journal therefore seeks to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers worldwide. Topics covered are of importance to all healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialist services. Surplus generated from the sale of Diabetic Medicine is used by Diabetes UK to know diabetes better and fight diabetes more effectively on behalf of all people affected by and at risk of diabetes as well as their families and carers.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信