Chris McChesney, Nicolas Orozco, Kyle Fiorini, Michelle Yee Suet Wong, Marat Slessarev, Ross Prager, Raymond Kao, Aleksandra Leligdowicz, Sameer Sharif, Kimberley Lewis, Bram Rochwerg, Kimia Honarmand, Ian M Ball, Robert Arntfield, Rachael Houlton, Logan VanNynatten, John Basmaji
{"title":"短效β受体阻滞剂对感染性休克患者预后的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Chris McChesney, Nicolas Orozco, Kyle Fiorini, Michelle Yee Suet Wong, Marat Slessarev, Ross Prager, Raymond Kao, Aleksandra Leligdowicz, Sameer Sharif, Kimberley Lewis, Bram Rochwerg, Kimia Honarmand, Ian M Ball, Robert Arntfield, Rachael Houlton, Logan VanNynatten, John Basmaji","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the impact of short-acting beta-blocker therapy on outcomes in adult patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and unpublished sources from inception to April 19, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated short-acting beta-blockers compared with usual care in patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>We collected data regarding study and patient characteristics, beta-blocker administration, and clinical, hemodynamic, and biomarker outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Twelve RCTs proved eligible ( n = 1170 patients). Short-acting beta-blockers may reduce 28-day mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.93; low certainty) and probably reduce new-onset tachyarrhythmias (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.78; moderate certainty) but may increase the duration of vasopressors (mean difference [MD], 1.04 d; 95% CI, 0.37-1.72; low certainty). Furthermore, there is an uncertain effect as to whether short-acting beta blockers impact 90-day mortality (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.73-1.31), ICU length of stay (MD, -0.75 d; 95% CI, -3.43 to 1.93 d), hospital length of stay (MD, 1.03 d; 95% CI, -1.92 to 3.98 d), duration of mechanical ventilation (MD, -0.10 d; 95% CI, -1.25 to 1.05 d) (all very low certainty), bradycardia episodes (RR, 3.14; 95% CI, 0.91-14.01), and hypotension episodes (RR, 4.74; 95% CI, 1.62-14.01) (all very low certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with septic shock, short-acting beta-blockers may improve survival and reduce new-onset tachyarrhythmias. However, these findings were based on low certainty evidence and given ongoing concerns regarding adverse effects and the increase duration of vasopressor use, we need larger and more rigorous RCTs to evaluate this intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e1125-e1139"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Short-Acting Beta-Blockers on the Outcomes of Patients With Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chris McChesney, Nicolas Orozco, Kyle Fiorini, Michelle Yee Suet Wong, Marat Slessarev, Ross Prager, Raymond Kao, Aleksandra Leligdowicz, Sameer Sharif, Kimberley Lewis, Bram Rochwerg, Kimia Honarmand, Ian M Ball, Robert Arntfield, Rachael Houlton, Logan VanNynatten, John Basmaji\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the impact of short-acting beta-blocker therapy on outcomes in adult patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and unpublished sources from inception to April 19, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated short-acting beta-blockers compared with usual care in patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>We collected data regarding study and patient characteristics, beta-blocker administration, and clinical, hemodynamic, and biomarker outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Twelve RCTs proved eligible ( n = 1170 patients). Short-acting beta-blockers may reduce 28-day mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.93; low certainty) and probably reduce new-onset tachyarrhythmias (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.78; moderate certainty) but may increase the duration of vasopressors (mean difference [MD], 1.04 d; 95% CI, 0.37-1.72; low certainty). Furthermore, there is an uncertain effect as to whether short-acting beta blockers impact 90-day mortality (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.73-1.31), ICU length of stay (MD, -0.75 d; 95% CI, -3.43 to 1.93 d), hospital length of stay (MD, 1.03 d; 95% CI, -1.92 to 3.98 d), duration of mechanical ventilation (MD, -0.10 d; 95% CI, -1.25 to 1.05 d) (all very low certainty), bradycardia episodes (RR, 3.14; 95% CI, 0.91-14.01), and hypotension episodes (RR, 4.74; 95% CI, 1.62-14.01) (all very low certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with septic shock, short-acting beta-blockers may improve survival and reduce new-onset tachyarrhythmias. However, these findings were based on low certainty evidence and given ongoing concerns regarding adverse effects and the increase duration of vasopressor use, we need larger and more rigorous RCTs to evaluate this intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1125-e1139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006604\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006604","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Short-Acting Beta-Blockers on the Outcomes of Patients With Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Objectives: To determine the impact of short-acting beta-blocker therapy on outcomes in adult patients with septic shock.
Data sources: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and unpublished sources from inception to April 19, 2024.
Study selection: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated short-acting beta-blockers compared with usual care in patients with septic shock.
Data extraction: We collected data regarding study and patient characteristics, beta-blocker administration, and clinical, hemodynamic, and biomarker outcomes.
Data synthesis: Twelve RCTs proved eligible ( n = 1170 patients). Short-acting beta-blockers may reduce 28-day mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.93; low certainty) and probably reduce new-onset tachyarrhythmias (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.78; moderate certainty) but may increase the duration of vasopressors (mean difference [MD], 1.04 d; 95% CI, 0.37-1.72; low certainty). Furthermore, there is an uncertain effect as to whether short-acting beta blockers impact 90-day mortality (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.73-1.31), ICU length of stay (MD, -0.75 d; 95% CI, -3.43 to 1.93 d), hospital length of stay (MD, 1.03 d; 95% CI, -1.92 to 3.98 d), duration of mechanical ventilation (MD, -0.10 d; 95% CI, -1.25 to 1.05 d) (all very low certainty), bradycardia episodes (RR, 3.14; 95% CI, 0.91-14.01), and hypotension episodes (RR, 4.74; 95% CI, 1.62-14.01) (all very low certainty).
Conclusions: In patients with septic shock, short-acting beta-blockers may improve survival and reduce new-onset tachyarrhythmias. However, these findings were based on low certainty evidence and given ongoing concerns regarding adverse effects and the increase duration of vasopressor use, we need larger and more rigorous RCTs to evaluate this intervention.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient.
Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.