短效β受体阻滞剂对感染性休克患者预后的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006604
Chris McChesney, Nicolas Orozco, Kyle Fiorini, Michelle Yee Suet Wong, Marat Slessarev, Ross Prager, Raymond Kao, Aleksandra Leligdowicz, Sameer Sharif, Kimberley Lewis, Bram Rochwerg, Kimia Honarmand, Ian M Ball, Robert Arntfield, Rachael Houlton, Logan VanNynatten, John Basmaji
{"title":"短效β受体阻滞剂对感染性休克患者预后的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Chris McChesney, Nicolas Orozco, Kyle Fiorini, Michelle Yee Suet Wong, Marat Slessarev, Ross Prager, Raymond Kao, Aleksandra Leligdowicz, Sameer Sharif, Kimberley Lewis, Bram Rochwerg, Kimia Honarmand, Ian M Ball, Robert Arntfield, Rachael Houlton, Logan VanNynatten, John Basmaji","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the impact of short-acting beta-blocker therapy on outcomes in adult patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and unpublished sources from inception to April 19, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated short-acting beta-blockers compared with usual care in patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>We collected data regarding study and patient characteristics, beta-blocker administration, and clinical, hemodynamic, and biomarker outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Twelve RCTs proved eligible ( n = 1170 patients). Short-acting beta-blockers may reduce 28-day mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.93; low certainty) and probably reduce new-onset tachyarrhythmias (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.78; moderate certainty) but may increase the duration of vasopressors (mean difference [MD], 1.04 d; 95% CI, 0.37-1.72; low certainty). Furthermore, there is an uncertain effect as to whether short-acting beta blockers impact 90-day mortality (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.73-1.31), ICU length of stay (MD, -0.75 d; 95% CI, -3.43 to 1.93 d), hospital length of stay (MD, 1.03 d; 95% CI, -1.92 to 3.98 d), duration of mechanical ventilation (MD, -0.10 d; 95% CI, -1.25 to 1.05 d) (all very low certainty), bradycardia episodes (RR, 3.14; 95% CI, 0.91-14.01), and hypotension episodes (RR, 4.74; 95% CI, 1.62-14.01) (all very low certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with septic shock, short-acting beta-blockers may improve survival and reduce new-onset tachyarrhythmias. However, these findings were based on low certainty evidence and given ongoing concerns regarding adverse effects and the increase duration of vasopressor use, we need larger and more rigorous RCTs to evaluate this intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e1125-e1139"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Short-Acting Beta-Blockers on the Outcomes of Patients With Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chris McChesney, Nicolas Orozco, Kyle Fiorini, Michelle Yee Suet Wong, Marat Slessarev, Ross Prager, Raymond Kao, Aleksandra Leligdowicz, Sameer Sharif, Kimberley Lewis, Bram Rochwerg, Kimia Honarmand, Ian M Ball, Robert Arntfield, Rachael Houlton, Logan VanNynatten, John Basmaji\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the impact of short-acting beta-blocker therapy on outcomes in adult patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and unpublished sources from inception to April 19, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated short-acting beta-blockers compared with usual care in patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>We collected data regarding study and patient characteristics, beta-blocker administration, and clinical, hemodynamic, and biomarker outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Twelve RCTs proved eligible ( n = 1170 patients). Short-acting beta-blockers may reduce 28-day mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.93; low certainty) and probably reduce new-onset tachyarrhythmias (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.78; moderate certainty) but may increase the duration of vasopressors (mean difference [MD], 1.04 d; 95% CI, 0.37-1.72; low certainty). Furthermore, there is an uncertain effect as to whether short-acting beta blockers impact 90-day mortality (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.73-1.31), ICU length of stay (MD, -0.75 d; 95% CI, -3.43 to 1.93 d), hospital length of stay (MD, 1.03 d; 95% CI, -1.92 to 3.98 d), duration of mechanical ventilation (MD, -0.10 d; 95% CI, -1.25 to 1.05 d) (all very low certainty), bradycardia episodes (RR, 3.14; 95% CI, 0.91-14.01), and hypotension episodes (RR, 4.74; 95% CI, 1.62-14.01) (all very low certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with septic shock, short-acting beta-blockers may improve survival and reduce new-onset tachyarrhythmias. However, these findings were based on low certainty evidence and given ongoing concerns regarding adverse effects and the increase duration of vasopressor use, we need larger and more rigorous RCTs to evaluate this intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1125-e1139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006604\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006604","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨短效β受体阻滞剂治疗对感染性休克成年患者预后的影响。数据来源:我们搜索了MEDLINE, Embase和未发表的来源,从开始到2024年4月19日。研究选择:我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCTs),这些试验评估了短效β受体阻滞剂与常规治疗在感染性休克患者中的作用。数据提取:我们收集了有关研究和患者特征、受体阻滞剂给药、临床、血流动力学和生物标志物结果的数据。数据综合:12项rct证明符合条件(n = 1170例患者)。短效受体阻滞剂可降低28天死亡率(相对危险度[RR], 0.76;95% ci, 0.62-0.93;低确定性)并可能减少新发心动过速(RR, 0.37;95% ci, 0.18-0.78;中度确定性),但可能会增加血管加压药的持续时间(平均差异[MD], 1.04 d;95% ci, 0.37-1.72;低确定性)。此外,短效受体阻滞剂是否影响90天死亡率存在不确定的影响(RR, 0.98;95% CI, 0.73-1.31), ICU住院时间(MD, -0.75 d;95% CI, -3.43 ~ 1.93 d)、住院时间(MD, 1.03 d;95% CI, -1.92 ~ 3.98 d),机械通气持续时间(MD, -0.10 d;95% CI, -1.25至1.05 d)(均为极低确定性),心动过缓发作(RR, 3.14;95% CI, 0.91-14.01)和低血压发作(RR, 4.74;95% CI, 1.62-14.01)(确定性都很低)。结论:在脓毒性休克患者中,短效β受体阻滞剂可以提高生存率并减少新发的心动过速。然而,这些发现是基于低确定性的证据,并且考虑到副作用和血管加压剂使用持续时间的增加,我们需要更大、更严格的随机对照试验来评估这种干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Short-Acting Beta-Blockers on the Outcomes of Patients With Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: To determine the impact of short-acting beta-blocker therapy on outcomes in adult patients with septic shock.

Data sources: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and unpublished sources from inception to April 19, 2024.

Study selection: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated short-acting beta-blockers compared with usual care in patients with septic shock.

Data extraction: We collected data regarding study and patient characteristics, beta-blocker administration, and clinical, hemodynamic, and biomarker outcomes.

Data synthesis: Twelve RCTs proved eligible ( n = 1170 patients). Short-acting beta-blockers may reduce 28-day mortality (relative risk [RR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.93; low certainty) and probably reduce new-onset tachyarrhythmias (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.78; moderate certainty) but may increase the duration of vasopressors (mean difference [MD], 1.04 d; 95% CI, 0.37-1.72; low certainty). Furthermore, there is an uncertain effect as to whether short-acting beta blockers impact 90-day mortality (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.73-1.31), ICU length of stay (MD, -0.75 d; 95% CI, -3.43 to 1.93 d), hospital length of stay (MD, 1.03 d; 95% CI, -1.92 to 3.98 d), duration of mechanical ventilation (MD, -0.10 d; 95% CI, -1.25 to 1.05 d) (all very low certainty), bradycardia episodes (RR, 3.14; 95% CI, 0.91-14.01), and hypotension episodes (RR, 4.74; 95% CI, 1.62-14.01) (all very low certainty).

Conclusions: In patients with septic shock, short-acting beta-blockers may improve survival and reduce new-onset tachyarrhythmias. However, these findings were based on low certainty evidence and given ongoing concerns regarding adverse effects and the increase duration of vasopressor use, we need larger and more rigorous RCTs to evaluate this intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信