IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mylène Michaud, Annie Roy-Charland, Mélanie Perron
{"title":"Effects of Explicit Knowledge and Attentional-Perceptual Processing on the Ability to Recognize Fear and Surprise.","authors":"Mylène Michaud, Annie Roy-Charland, Mélanie Perron","doi":"10.3390/bs15020166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When participants are asked to identify expressed emotions from pictures, fear is often confused with surprise. The present study explored this confusion by utilizing one prototype of surprise and three prototypes of fear varying as a function of distinctive cues in the fear prototype (cue in the eyebrows, in the mouth or both zones). Participants were presented with equal numbers of pictures expressing surprise and fear. Eye movements were monitored when they were deciding if the picture was fear or surprise. Following each trial, explicit knowledge was assessed by asking the importance (yes vs. no) of five regions (mouth, nose, eyebrows, eyes, cheeks) in recognizing the expression. Results revealed that fear with both distinctive cues was recognized more accurately, followed by the prototype of surprise and fear with a distinctive cue in the mouth at a similar level. Finally, fear with a distinctive cue in the eyebrows was the least accurately recognized. Explicit knowledge discriminability results revealed that participants were aware of the relevant areas for each prototype but not equally so for all prototypes. Specifically, participants judged the eyebrow area as more important when the distinctive cue was in the eyebrows (fear-eyebrow) than when the cue was in the mouth (fear-mouth) or when both cues were present (fear-both). Results are discussed considering the attentional-perceptual and explicit knowledge limitation hypothesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11851943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15020166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当要求受试者从图片中识别所表达的情绪时,恐惧往往会与惊讶相混淆。本研究利用一个惊讶原型和三个恐惧原型来探讨这种混淆,恐惧原型中的不同线索(眉毛中的线索、嘴中的线索或两个区域中的线索)会产生不同的效果。参与者会看到相同数量的表示惊讶和恐惧的图片。当他们判断图片是恐惧还是惊讶时,他们的眼球运动将受到监测。每次试验后,通过询问五个区域(嘴、鼻子、眉毛、眼睛和脸颊)在识别表情中的重要性(是与否)来评估显性知识。结果显示,带有两个独特线索的恐惧表情识别准确率更高,其次是惊讶原型和带有嘴部独特线索的恐惧表情,两者的识别准确率相近。最后,眉毛上有独特线索的恐惧表情识别最不准确。显性知识可辨别性的结果表明,受试者对每个原型的相关区域都有所了解,但并不是对所有原型都同样了解。具体来说,当眉毛上有明显线索时(恐惧-眉毛),被试对眉毛区域的判断比对嘴部(恐惧-嘴部)或同时有两个线索时(恐惧-两个)更重要。研究结果将根据注意-知觉和显性知识限制假说进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Explicit Knowledge and Attentional-Perceptual Processing on the Ability to Recognize Fear and Surprise.

When participants are asked to identify expressed emotions from pictures, fear is often confused with surprise. The present study explored this confusion by utilizing one prototype of surprise and three prototypes of fear varying as a function of distinctive cues in the fear prototype (cue in the eyebrows, in the mouth or both zones). Participants were presented with equal numbers of pictures expressing surprise and fear. Eye movements were monitored when they were deciding if the picture was fear or surprise. Following each trial, explicit knowledge was assessed by asking the importance (yes vs. no) of five regions (mouth, nose, eyebrows, eyes, cheeks) in recognizing the expression. Results revealed that fear with both distinctive cues was recognized more accurately, followed by the prototype of surprise and fear with a distinctive cue in the mouth at a similar level. Finally, fear with a distinctive cue in the eyebrows was the least accurately recognized. Explicit knowledge discriminability results revealed that participants were aware of the relevant areas for each prototype but not equally so for all prototypes. Specifically, participants judged the eyebrow area as more important when the distinctive cue was in the eyebrows (fear-eyebrow) than when the cue was in the mouth (fear-mouth) or when both cues were present (fear-both). Results are discussed considering the attentional-perceptual and explicit knowledge limitation hypothesis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Sciences
Behavioral Sciences Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
429
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信